M-2 protocol for melphalan-resistant and relapsing multiple myeloma

33 patients with advanced refractory multiple myeloma received a combination of vincristine, cyclophosphamide, carmustine, melphalan and steroids (M-2 protocol). 20 of them had failed prior chemotherapy with alkylating agents and the remaining 13 patients had relapsed after a response to these drugs. An objective tumour cell mass reduction (greater than or equal to 50%) was achieved in 17% of the patients (6% of previously nonresponders and 33% of previously relapsing), while 9 additional patients improved (30-50% tumour reduction), for an overall response rate of 47% (39% for previously nonresponders and 58% for previously relapsing). The median duration of response was 7 months. Thrombocytopenia was the most common toxicity encountered in the study (39% of cases). Our findings indicate that M-2 protocol is an effective salvage treatment for patients who relapse from previous chemotherapy with alkylating agents. In contrast, results in patients who are primarily resistant to these drugs justify the search for different treatment programmes which can produce greater degrees of tumour reduction.     

Clinical and molecular follow-up by amplification of the CDR-III IgH region in multiple myeloma patients after autologous transplantation of hematopoietic CD34+ stem cells.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Autologous blood stem cell transplantation (ABSCT) using chemotherapy-induced mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) is being increasingly used in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM). We report the clinical and molecular follow-up of 10 MM patients who underwent autologous stem cell transplantation with peripheral blood selected CD34+ cells, as support therapy following a myeloablative conditioning regimen. DESIGN AND METHODS: The CDR-III coding region of the IgH gene was studied by a) consensus PCR applied to 8 MM patients, or b) by direct sequencing of PCR product generated by family-specific primers in the remaining two patients (who became immunofixation analysis (IF) negative). In this case, two patient-specific primers were generated, thus obtaining a high PCR assay sensitivity and specificity (ASO PCR). RESULTS: Seven patients are alive: 4 of them have serum M protein assessable by IF, while 1 was not a secretor and 2 converted from serum IF positivity to negativity 6 and 12 months after ABSCT. Three patients died: 1 from disease progression and 2 from infective complications during clinical remission. The molecular analysis during the follow-up showed that the bone marrow samples from the two patients who obtained IF negativity were persistently PCR positive for the presence of rearranged CDR-III region. Moreover, despite the remarkable reduction of myeloma burden, a minimal level of residual myeloma cells was still detectable by molecular analysis. INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: These results confirm that although positive selection of CD34+ cells markedly reduces the contamination of myeloma cells from apheresis products by up to 3 log, and provides a cell suspension capable of restoring normal hematopoiesis after ablative conditioning regimen, it does not abrogate myeloma cell contamination in most of the apheresis products.     

Progress in allogenic bone marrow and peripheral blood stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma: a comparison between transplants performed 1983--93 and 1994--8 at European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation centres

Out of 690 allogeneic matched sibling donor transplants for multiple myeloma reported to the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) registry, 334 were performed during the period 1983-93 (all with bone marrow) and 356 during 1994-98 [223 with bone marrow and 133 with peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs)]. The median overall survival was 10 months for patients transplanted during the earlier time period and 50 months for patients transplanted with hone marrow during the later period. The use of PBSCs was associated with earlier engraftment but no significant survival benefit compared to bone marrow transplants during the same time period. The improvement in survival since 1994 with the result of a significant reduction in transplant-related mortality, which was 38%, 21% and 25% at 6 months and 46%, 30% and 37% at 2 years during the earlier period, and the later period with bone marrow and PBSCs respectively. Reasons for the reduced transplant-related mortality appeared to be fewer deaths owing to bacterial and fungal infections and interstitial pneumonitis, in turn a result of earlier transplantation and less prior chemotherapy. Better supportive treatment and more frequent use of cytokines may also play a role. The improvement in survival was not directly related to the increased use of PBSCs.     

Myeloma in patients younger than age 50 years presents with more favorable features and shows better survival: an analysis of 10 549 patients from the International Myeloma Working Group

We analyzed the presenting features and survival in 1689 patients with multiple myeloma aged younger than 50 years compared with 8860 patients 50 years of age and older. Of the total 10 549 patients, 7765 received conventional therapy and 2784 received high-dose therapy. Young patients were more frequently male, had more favorable features such as low International Staging System (ISS) and Durie-Salmon stage as well as less frequently adverse prognostic factors including high C-reactive protein (CRP), low hemoglobin, increased serum creatinine, and poor performance status. Survival was significantly longer in young patients (median, 5.2 years vs 3.7 years; P < .001) both after conventional (median, 4.5 years vs 3.3 years; P < .001) or high-dose therapy (median, 7.5 years vs 5.7 years; P = .04). The 10-year survival rate was 19% after conventional therapy and 43% after high-dose therapy in young patients, and 8% and 29%, respectively, in older patients. Multivariate analysis revealed age as an independent risk factor during conventional therapy, but not after autologous transplantation. A total of 5 of the 10 independent risk factors identified for conventional therapy were also relevant for autologous transplantation. After adjusting for normal mortality, lower ISS stage and other favorable prognostic features seem to account for the significantly longer survival of young patients with multiple myeloma with age remaining a risk factor during conventional therapy.     

European Myeloma Network recommendations on the evaluation and treatment of newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma

Multiple myeloma management has undergone profound changes in the past thanks to advances in our understanding of the disease biology and improvements in treatment and supportive care approaches. This article presents recommendations of the European Myeloma Network for newly diagnosed patients based on the GRADE system for level of evidence. All patients with symptomatic disease should undergo risk stratification to classify patients for International Staging System stage (level of evidence: 1A) and for cytogenetically defined high- versus standard-risk groups (2B). Novel-agent-based induction and up-front autologous stem cell transplantation in medically fit patients remains the standard of care (1A). Induction therapy should include a triple combination of bortezomib, with either adriamycin or thalidomide and dexamethasone (1A), or with cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone (2B). Currently, allogeneic stem cell transplantation may be considered for young patients with high-risk disease and preferably in the context of a clinical trial (2B). Thalidomide (1B) or lenalidomide (1A) maintenance increases progression-free survival and possibly overall survival (2B). Bortezomib-based regimens are a valuable consolidation option, especially for patients who failed excellent response after autologous stem cell transplantation (2A). Bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone or melphalan-prednisone-thalidomide are the standards of care for transplant-ineligible patients (1A). Melphalan-prednisone-lenalidomide with lenalidomide maintenance increases progression-free survival, but overall survival data are needed. New data from the phase III study (MM-020/IFM 07-01) of lenalidomide-low-dose dexamethasone reached its primary end point of a statistically significant improvement in progression-free survival as compared to melphalan-prednisone-thalidomide and provides further evidence for the efficacy of lenalidomide-low-dose dexamethasone in transplant-ineligible patients (2B).