Reasons for delay in cataract surgery in patients with advanced cataracts during the COVID-19 pandemic

Purpose:To analyze the reasons for delay in cataract surgery in patients with advanced cataracts during the COVID-19 pandemic.Methods:This was a prospective, cross-sectional, multicenter questionnaire study which included patients with mature cataract, nuclear sclerotic cataract grade IV, and cataracts with best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) <5/60, during the COVID-19 pandemic from December 2020 to April 2021. Reasons for delay in presentation to the hospital were analyzed.Results:One thousand four hundred seventy two patients were recruited with advanced cataracts. Absence of ophthalmic care nearby (44.2%), lack of awareness regarding elective surgeries (42.6%), lack of public transportation (37%), fear of contracting COVID-19 (23.4%), and waiting for outreach camps (20.4%) were found to be the reasons behind the delay in cataract surgery. 53.7% of the patients had worsening of defective vision and 55.3% of them had difficulty in carrying out activities of family living. 30.8% of the patients faced difficulty in commuting and 8.4% of the patients suffered a fall during this pandemic due to worsening of the visual acuity.Conclusion:The lockdown imposed during the pandemic has created a significant backlog of patients who are progressing to advanced cataracts due to lack of ophthalmic care nearby, lack of awareness regarding elective surgeries, lack of public transportation, and no outreach camps. Proactive measures to deal with this backlog are of utmost need to prevent blindness due to cataract.     

Addressing the MSICS learning curve: identification of instrument-holding techniques used by experienced surgeons

AIM: To detect the quantitative expression levels of the pro-inflammatory interleukin-8 (IL8), antimicrobial peptides Human beta defense-2 (HBD2), and Human beta defense-3 (HBD3) genes in bacterial conjunctivitis. METHODS: The human conjunctival epithelial cells were obtained using the impression cytology technique from healthy controls and patients. The genes expression levels were determined utilizing a quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The contribution of causative agent type, the number of isolates and severity of clinical features, in the increase of genes expression was also determined. RESULTS: The RT-PCR showed that IL8, HBD2, and HBD3 expression increased in bacterial conjunctivitis as compared to healthy control (P<0.001). In gram-negative bacterial conjunctivitis, HBD2 was highly up-regulated (P<0.001) compared to other types of bacterial conjunctivitis. In mixed bacterial conjunctivitis, a direct correlation between HBD2 up-regulation and HBD3 up-regulation was observed (P<0.05). The severity of clinical features was related to the up-regulation of IL8 and HBD2 (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: IL8, HBD2, and HBD3 are immune-effectors in infectious conjunctivitis. HBD2 is active during different bacterial conjunctivitis but is more released with gram-negative bacteria compared to gram-positive bacteria. HBD3 is an obvious defender in different bacterial conjunctivitis.     

A novel device for safe exteriorization of haptic in scleral fixation intraocular lens surgery

The aim of this study was to describe a novel device that has been designed to facilitate anterior segment and novice surgeons to perform extraocular needle-guided haptic insertion technique (X-NIT) for scleral fixation intraocular lens surgery (SFIOL). We performed SFIOL surgery using X-NIT device in 21 eyes of 21 patients. The mean preoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 0.5 ± 0.2 logarithm of minimum angle of resolution (log MAR), which improved by one or more lines postoperatively in all eyes. There were no intraoperative complications. Postoperatively, we noted minimal corneal edema in one patient and dispersed vitreous hemorrhage in one patient. The sharpness and angulation of the needle and the haptic holding ability of silicone stopper were found to be satisfactory. The X-NIT device may potentially improve the safety of SFIOL procedures by minimizing intraocular maneuvers.     

Making the decision to donate eyes: Perspectives from the families of the deceased in Madurai,India

Purpose:To identify factors affecting family members'' decision whether to donate eye organs.Methods:A community-based case-control study based on in-home interviews with families of deceased individuals who had or had not donated eye organs, in Madurai district, Tamil Nadu, India. Data collected were knowledge and awareness of eye donations, whether the deceased individual had expressed or pledged willingness to donate, and family members'' attitudes and willingness to donate their own eye organs.Results:Seventy-six families of donors and 256 families of non-donors completed the survey. Multivariable analysis showed that the following variables were significantly associated with a donation: age, whether the deceased had registered for eye donation, pre-expressed willingness of deceased to donate, whether family members personally know beneficiaries of eye donations, and higher score on a scale evaluating knowledge and awareness about eye donation. The majority of donors'' families (71%) had been encouraged by someone to donate. Among non-donor families, a substantially larger fraction (52.8%) indicated they would have donated had someone reminded or encouraged them to do so, in comparison with those who indicated lack of awareness or knowledge (14.5%).Conclusion:Community programs are likely to be effective if they encourage individuals to pledge their eyes or express their willingness to donate their eyes to family members in advance of death; they increase public awareness of the value of eye donation. A friend, family member, neighbor or counselor approaching bereaved families and having a dialogue about eye donation would substantially increase the probability of a decision to donate.     

Diabetic retinopathy among self reported diabetics in southern India: a population based assessment

AIMS: To estimate the prevalence of diabetic retinopathy among self reported diabetics in a population of southern India. METHODS: A cross sectional sample of subjects aged 50 years and older was selected using a cluster sampling technique from Palakkad district of Kerala state. Eligible subjects were identified through a door to door survey. Ocular examinations including visual acuity and anterior and posterior segment examinations were performed at preselected sites within clusters. History of diabetes was elicited, and height, weight, and blood pressure were measured for all subjects. RESULTS: Among the 5212 examined people (92% response rate), 68 (26.2%) of 260 people with self reported history of diabetes had diabetic retinopathy. The age-sex adjusted prevalence of diabetes among people aged 50 years and older was 5.1% (95% CI 3.9, 6.3, deff 4.33) and of diabetic retinopathy among the diabetics was 26.8% (95% CI: 19.2, 34.4, deff 1.99). Non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (94.1%) was the most common form of retinopathy seen. Two eyes were blind (presenting vision <6/60) as a result of retinopathy. CONCLUSION: Preventive strategies have to be evolved to ensure that blindness due to diabetic retinopathy does not become a public health problem in India. Further studies are required to understand the risk factors for retinopathy and vision loss in this population.