Marginal and Internal Gap of Metal Copings Fabricated Using Three Types of Resin Patterns with Subtractive and Additive Technology: An In Vitro Comparison

This study analyzes the evidence of the marginal discrepancy and internal adaptation of copings fabricated using three types of resin patterns with subtractive (milling) and additive technology (3D printing), as it is not widely reported. Working casts (n = 15) were scanned and patterns were completed using computer-aided designing (CAD). Resin patterns were fabricated using the designed data and divided into three groups according to the method of fabrication of patterns: subtractive technology–CAD milled polymethyl methacrylate resin (Group-PMMA), additive technology [digital light processing (DLP) technique]–acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene (ABS) patterns (Group-ABS), and polylactic acid (PLA) patterns (Group-PLA). Resin patterns were casted with Cobalt–Chromium (Co–Cr) alloy (lost wax technique). Internal and marginal gaps of the metal copings were analyzed with the replica technique under optical microscope. The Kruskal–Wallis test was used to compare values among the groups, and post hoc multiple tests confirmed the specific differences within the groups. The median marginal gap was least for CAD milled resin patterns, followed by PLA printed resin patterns and ABS printed resin patterns. There were significant differences between Group-PMMA and Group-PLA and Group-ABS (p = 0.0001). There was no significant difference between Group-PLA and Group-ABS (p = 0.899). The median internal gap was least for metal copings fabricated from Group-PLA, followed by Group-ABS and Group-PMMA. The differences were not statistically significant (p = 0.638) for the internal gap. Full metal Co–Cr copings fabricated from the milled PMMA group had a better marginal fit, followed by the PLA and ABS printed groups. Copings fabricated with the PLA printed group had the best internal fit, though the values were statistically insignificant between the groups.     

Provider uptake of extragenital screening for gonorrhea and chlamydia in a cohort of Air Force members with incident HIV diagnosis

The prevalence of Neisseria gonorrhea (GC) and Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) is higher at extragenital anatomic sites among men who have sex with men (MSM) with HIV infection. Although national guidelines recommend that all MSM with HIV infection undergo screening for extragenital sexually transmitted infections (EG-STIs), uptake is low in many primary care settings. We evaluated EG-STI screening by primary care providers (PCPs) for US Air Force (USAF) members with incident HIV infection. All USAF members with incident HIV infection who received initial HIV specialty care with Infectious Disease (ID) providers at Brooke Army Medical Center from 2016 to 2018 (n = 98) were included. A retrospective chart review was conducted to evaluate STI screening performed by PCPs within 1 week of HIV diagnosis compared to screening at entry into ID care. Demographic, clinical, laboratory and behavioral risk data were collected. STI screening included GC/CT EG-STIs, urethral GC/CT, syphilis, and hepatitis B and C. Patients were predominantly male (98%) with a median age of 26 (IQR 23, 32) years at HIV diagnosis. A previous history of STIs was reported in 53 (54%) patients and the majority of males self-identified as MSM (66%) or bisexual (23%). The median time from HIV diagnosis to ID evaluation was 26 days (IQR 9, 33). PCPs performed any STI screening in 61 (62%) patients. EG-STI screening was conducted in 3 (3%) patients overall and in (3%) MSM/bisexuals. A total of 31 (32%) patients had missed STIs; the majority due to EG-STIs of the rectum (59%) and pharynx (19%). All EG-STIs would have been missed by urethral GC/CT screening alone. EG-STI screening uptake was low among PCPs evaluating USAF members with incident HIV infection. Underutilization of EG-STI screening can result in missed infections and forward transmission of GC/CT. Barriers to low uptake need to be explored.     

Temperature Dependent Adsorption–Desorption Behaviour of Pendimethalin in Punjab Soils

Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology - This study shows the effect of soil type and temperature on the adsorption and desorption behaviour of pendimethalin using a batch...     

Transradial Approach to Cardiovascular Interventions: An Update

Background Since the first cardiac catheterization in 1929, the procedure has continually evolved with advances in understanding, capabilities, and ease of operation. Though historically performed by cut down of the brachial artery, cardiologists soon learned that transfemoral access was both easier to perform and more efficacious with regard to patient outcome. In the last 20 years, the transradial approach has been adopted, and is being utilized with increasing frequency. Methods We conducted a survey of literature published concerning safety, efficacy, cost-effectiveness, and global uptake of transradial catheterization with specific attention to how transradial interventions compare with transfemoral interventions. Results This review of literature indicates that when performed by an experienced interventionalist, radial catheterization is as effective as femoral catheterization and has additional benefits of shorter length of hospital stay and reduced patient costs. Transradial access is superior to transfemoral access in some, but not all, clinical scenarios; in addition, it is an effective alternative for catheterization in patients contraindicated for transfemoral procedures. Adoption of radial access in the United States is at a faster rate than previously expected, though rate of use varies drastically worldwide. Conclusion The transradial approach is an excellent option for carrying out cardiovascular interventions, and will be adopted by more cardiologists in the upcoming years.