In vivo electrochemical demonstration of potassium-evoked monoamine release from rat cerebellum

In vivo electrochemical methods were employed to study the potassium (K⁺-evoked release of monoamines from the cerebellum of the chloral hydrate anesthetized rat. K⁺-evoked releases were elicited using micropipette-Nafion-coated graphite epoxy electrode arrays in the granule/Purkenje cell layer, molecular layer, and white matter. These recorded releases were generally found to be reversible, moderately dose-dependent, and reproducible. However, the temporal dynamics of the releases were different for the cell layer versus molecular layer records. Releases were infrequently observed in cerebellar white matter, an area which is relatively devoid of monoamine containing terminals. The signals recorded from the cell and molecular layers were significantly attenuated by pretreatment with nomifensine, a potent catecholamine reuptake blocker, significantly prolonged the K⁺-evoked signals observed in both the granule/Purkenje cell and molecular layers. These data, taken together with earlier reports on the electrophysiological responses to activation of cerebellar noradrenergic inputs, support the conjecture that in vivo electrochemical recording methods have the sensitivity and spatial resolution for studies of functional monoamine release from brain regions that have a diffuse or laminated monoamine innervation.     

Nonadrenergic [3H]idazoxan binding sites are physically distinct from alpha 2-adrenergic receptors

We have recently demonstrated that the alpha 2-adrenergic radioligand [3H]idazoxan also labels additional sites that do not recognize catecholamines but bind with high affinity several chemically distinct drugs previously assumed to be highly selective for alpha 2-adrenergic receptors [Mol. Pharmacol. 35:324-330 (1989)]. We now have used three approaches to distinguish the nonadrenergic [3H]idazoxan sites from alpha 2-adrenergic receptors. (a) No nonadrenergic [3H]idazoxan binding sites were found in COS-7 cells transfected with the genes for the two known alpha 2-adrenergic receptor subtypes. (b) The ratio of alpha 2-adrenergic and nonadrenergic [3H]idazoxan sites in human platelet membranes varied considerably between various donors. (c) Highly purified platelet plasma membranes were enriched for alpha 2-adrenergic receptors but did not contain any nonadrenergic [3H]idazoxan binding sites. We conclude that the nonadrenergic [3H]idazoxan binding sites are not co-expressed with alpha 2-adrenergic receptors and at least in human platelets may be located in an intracellular compartment.     

Comparison of the inflammatory response between miniaturized and standard CPB circuits in aortic valve surgery.

OBJECTIVE: One of the complications of CPB is the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). Recent developments tend to minimize the biological impact of CPB in using miniaturized closed circuit with reduced priming volume and less blood-air interface. The benefit of these miniaturized closed circuits in terms of inflammatory response has been proved in coronary surgery. However, in open heart surgery, the CPB circuit is no more closed and the benefit of the miniaturized set-up could disappear. The aim of the study is to compare the SIRS between standard and miniaturized circuits in aortic surgery. METHODS: Forty patients who underwent singular aortic valve replacement were randomly assigned either to a standard CPB (group A, n=20) or to a miniaturized CPB (group B, n=20). Pertinent clinical and surgical data were collected. Hematological parameters (leukocyte and neutrophil counts) and biochemical parameters (C-reactive protein, cytokine tests) were determined pre-, on and post-CPB. RESULTS: There were an increase in leukocyte and neutrophil counts and a decline in hematocrit in both groups. In both groups, there was a raise after CPB, in C-reactive protein, IL-6, TNF-alpha, neutrophil elastase, and IL-10. However, the raises of elastase and TNF-alpha were significantly lower after the weaning of miniaturized CPB (116+/-46 ng/ml and 10+/-4 pg/ml, respectively) compared to standard CPB (265+/-120 ng/ml, P=0.01 and 18+/-7 pg/ml, P=0.03). The raise of IL-10 is also lower with miniaturized circuit (15+/-6 pg/ml) compared to standard circuit (51+/-26, P=0.004). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates in aortic surgery, the lesser inflammatory response of a miniaturized CPB compared to a standard CPB. However, there is always some inflammation after CPB and a small bio-reactive free perfusion circuit is still to be found in open heart surgery.     

Comparison of murex single-use diagnostic system with traditional enzyme immunoassay for detection of exposure to human immunodeficiency virus.

Because a retrospective study detected 13 negative Western blots out of 38 single-use diagnostic system (SUDS)-positive cases over a 1-year period, we performed a prospective study to compare the performance of the SUDS test with that of enzyme immunoassay (EIA). Of 888 SUDS-tested sera, 875 (98.4%) were both SUDS and EIA negative and 5 (0.6%) were SUDS, EIA, and Western blot positive. The rate of SUDS-positive samples decreased from 3.16/month in the retrospective study to 1.33/month in the prospective study. The immunoassays had sensitivities and specificities of 100 and 99.7 (SUDS) and 100 and 99.4% (traditional EIA), respectively. In laboratories with experienced personnel, the SUDS test performs as well as the EIA as a screen for infection with the human immunodeficiency virus.     

Two-week stimulation or blockade of the sympathetic nervous system in man: influence on body weight, body composition, and twenty four-hour energy expenditure

Seven lean healthy young men were studied for 6 weeks during exposure to pharmacologic inhibition or stimulation of the sympathetic nervous system. For a period of 2 weeks their beta-adrenergic receptors were either blocked with propranolol hydrochloride (160 mg/d) or stimulated with terbutaline sulphate (15 mg/d). After a further 2 weeks of placebo administration (500 mg lactose/d), the subjects crossed over to the drug they had not been taking at the beginning of the experiment for another 14 days. During the last five days of each 2-week period, the subjects consumed a weight-maintaining diet, composed of 12% protein, 48% carbohydrate, and 40% fat. They consumed exactly the same menus on the same days during the subsequent study periods. Body weight and physical activity were measured every day for 6 weeks. Daily heart rate and nitrogen excretion were measured continuously for days at the end of each 2-week period, the last two days of which were spent in a respiration chamber where energy expenditure and a variety of metabolic parameters were measured. In the respiration chamber on the propranolol, placebo, and terbutaline treatments, respectively, significant differences were observed in mean daily heart rate (65 +/- 3, 75 +/- 4, and 84 +/- 4 beats/min), mean sleeping heart rate (51 +/- 2, 56 +/- 3, and 62 +/- 3 beats/min), nitrogen excretion (13.6 +/- 0.7, 12.6 +/- 0.6, and 11.9 +/- 0.6 g/d), fat oxidation (+1,045 +/- 95, +1,243 +/- 148, and +1,278 +/- 84 kcal/d) and thyroid hormones (12.0 +/- 0.7, 15.7 +/- 0.9, and 17.2 +/- 1.0 T3/T4 ratio).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Brief report: child-rearing practices of caregivers with and without a child with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis: perspectives of caregivers and professionals

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate predictions from professionals in pediatric rheumatology regarding the child-rearing practices of caregivers of children with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis (JRA) and healthy classmates. METHODS: Sixteen professionals identified items from the Child-Rearing Practices Report (CRPR) that were expected to differentiate between caregivers of children with JRA (64 mothers, 45 fathers) and caregivers of healthy classmates (64 mothers, 40 fathers). Families were interviewed, and physician ratings of disease severity were obtained. RESULTS: Experts predicted difficulties in protectiveness, discipline, and worry. Ratings from parents of children with JRA showed modest agreement with the professionals, surprising similarity to controls, and a limited association with disease factors. CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to expert opinion, JRA has only a modest influence on some child-rearing practices. Educating health care providers may minimize misperceptions about caring for children with JRA, and screening parents of children with more severe disease may assist in allocating education and services for families.