Ipsilateral mid-third clavicle fracture with grade V acromioclavicular joint dislocation

We report the case of a 20-year-old man with an ipsilateral mid-third clavicle fracture with grade V acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocation. The combination of these two injuries is rare. A literature search produced various treatment algorithms. In this case, the patient was successfully treated with a Bosworth screw.This work was carried out in the Department of Orthopaedics, William Harvey Hospital, Ashford, Kent, UK     

Management of thoraco-lumbar fractures

The immediate surgical goals in the treatment of thoraco-lumbar fractures are decompression of compromised neural structures and stabilization of the vertebral column. If more sophisticated instrumentation is available, e.g. A.O.-fixateur interne or instrument set according to Kluger, stable reposition and reformation of compressed vertebral bodies also becomes possible. The long-term goals are to prevent delayed onset of spinal deformity, pain, and further neurological deficit. Early operative stabilization also shortens hospitalization time and allows immediate ambulation, thus lessening pulmonary, vascular, urological, and psychological complications. The Department of Neurosurgery, Sher-I-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, treated 75 cases of thoraco-lumbar fractures. Out of 75 cases 63 were operated upon: 32 cases by spinal fusion alone and 31 by a combined procedure of decompression and posterior spinal fusion with fibular graft. 52 showed evidence of recovery ranging from moderate to excellent in a follow-up of 2-3 years. Thus surgery resulted not only in giving a stable spine to patients but also good improvement of neurodeficits. Our experiences demonstrate that operative treatment of thoraco-lumbar fractures can give satisfactory results even in situations where sophisticated instrumentation is not available.     

Conventional versus digital radiographs for intraoperative cervical spine-level localization: a prospective time and cost analysis

BackgroundIn today's health-care environment, operational efficiency is intrinsic to balancing the need for increased productivity driven by rising costs and potentially decreasing reimbursement. Other operational factors kept constant, decreasing the time for a procedure can be viewed as one marker for increased efficiency.PurposeTo prospectively evaluate the time and operating room efficiency differences between the two methods for intraoperative level localization.Stydy designProspective nonrandomized study.Patient sampleProspective consecutive patients undergoing a single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with plate and allograft.Outcomes measuresTime for performance and interpretation of intraoperative localization radiograph.MethodsThis is a prospective nonrandomized study of patients treated consecutively with a single-level ACDF with allograft and plating. All the patients underwent a conventional approach to the cervical spine. After exposure, a spinal needle was placed in the exposed intervertebral disc and a radiography was performed. Either a conventional or a digital radiography was used in each case.ResultsEighteen patients were enrolled in this study. Ten patients underwent localization with conventional radiography, whereas eight patients underwent localization with digital imaging. The mean time for conventional radiography was 823 seconds (standard deviation [SD], 159), and for digital, it was 100 seconds (SD, 34; p<.001).ConclusionsCurrent technology provides options for level localization. Digital imaging provides equally accurate information as conventional radiography in a significantly reduced amount of time. Image quality, ease or archival, and manipulation provided by digital radiography are superior to those by provided fluoroscopy. Keeping operational factors constant, decreasing the time for a procedure, and increasing the efficiency of the environment may be viewed as a surrogate for improving the cost basis for a procedure.     

Dynamics of saccadic adaptation: differences between athletes and nonathletes.

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to delineate differences in saccadic adaptation characteristics between a population of racquet sports athletes and nonathletes. METHODS: Eye movements were recorded at 120 Hz using a video-based eye tracker (ELMAR 2020) in a sample of 27 athletes (varsity badminton and squash players) and 14 nonathletes (<3 hours/week participation in recreational sports). Responses to negative positional error and positive positional error were studied in two sessions on separate days. Negative positional errors were induced by displacing the stimuli backwards by 3 degrees from the initial target step (12 degrees). Likewise, positive positional errors were induced by displacing the stimuli forward by 3 degrees . Amplitude gains were calculated for trials before, during, and after the adaptation phase. The magnitude and the rate of change of saccadic adaptation were determined from the amplitude gains. Differences between the groups were compared using regression analysis. RESULTS: No significant differences were found between the two groups in the magnitude of saccadic adaptation, both for negative (athletes -60%, nonathletes -57%) and positive (athletes +26%, and nonathletes +27%) positional error. Racquet sports athletes showed a significantly faster rate of adaptation for the positive positional error. A significant difference was not observed in the rate of adaptation for the negative positional error. CONCLUSIONS: Racquet sports athletes and nonathletes adapt to positional error signals by similar amounts. However, racquet sports athletes respond to positive positional errors at a faster rate, suggesting that a strategic component or environmental influences (such as practice) may play a role in saccadic adaptation.     

Radiofrequency tissue ablation: an early Indian experience.

INTRODUCTION: Radiofrequency (RF) tissue ablation has been tried safely and effectively in the West as percutaneous local tissue ablation therapy. We present our experience with this technique in malignant lesions. METHODS: RF tumor ablation was done using an RF generator (Berchtold; Germany) generating 35-50 RF watts of power output. The RF needle was placed in the tumor under image guidance (n = 22) or at open surgery (n = 1). Around 1500 watts/cm3 RF energy was delivered to the tumor. Over 21 months, 23 patients underwent the procedure for 73 lesions, including metastatic liver lesions (n = 21) and locally advanced inoperable carcinoma of pancreas (n = 2). RESULTS: All lesions less than 3 cm in size (n = 15) and 39% of lesions 3-4 cm in size (17/44) had complete necrosis. Residual tumor was seen in 27/44 lesions (61%) 3-4 cm in size and in all 14 lesions more than 4 cm in size. There was no mortality or major morbidity. There were two minor complications (ascites 1, pleural effusion 1). Of 21 patients treated for liver metastases, 10 are still alive (6-month survival 19/21 [90%] and 12-month survival 11/17 [64.7%]). Only 2 of 32 (6.2%) lesions with complete necrosis had local recurrence. CONCLUSION: RF tumor ablation is a safe and effective local tissue ablative method in Indian patients.