原发性开角型青光眼与24h眼压及眼灌注压的研究进展

原发性开角型青光眼是一类早期无明显临床症状,但随病情进展将导致不可逆的视神经损害及视野缺损的致盲性眼病。眼压是原发性开角型青光眼诊断及评定治疗效果的简单而又重要的指标。临床上,一些治疗中的原发性开角型青光眼患者白天就诊时间所测眼压已达靶眼压,但视神经损害却仍在进展,研究表明可能与夜间眼压的升高、24 h较大的眼压波动及夜间眼灌注压的降低有关。因此,我们对原发性开角型青光眼与眼压及眼灌注压波动的相关文献予以综述,以更好的理解三者之间的关系。     

POAG患者习惯性体位眼压及眼灌注压昼夜波动趋势的研究

目的：探讨初诊未行治疗的原发性开角型青光眼( prilary open angle glaucola,POAG)患者习惯性体位眼压及眼灌注压(ocular perfusion pressure,OPP)波动趋势,并验证由日间平均坐位及卧位眼压推导夜间峰值眼压的可行性。
　　方法：选取POAG患者19例19眼及正常对照组18例18眼,分别于10：00,14：00,18：00及22：00时行坐位眼压及血压监测,为验证由日间卧位眼压推导夜间峰值眼压的可行性,另对POAG组于卧位5 lin后再行监测。2：00,5：00及7：00行卧位监测,计算出OPP并行数据分析。由已知公式通过日间眼压计算夜间峰值眼压,并与实际值对比。
　　结果：24h习惯性体位下,POAG患者平均眼压及眼压波动均高于正常对照组(P<0.05),POAG组平均眼压峰值出现于凌晨5：00,对照组则为7：00。两组夜间眼压均值均大于日间,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组内习惯性体位平均眼灌注压( MOPP )均表现为夜间低于日间( P<0.05),而两组间 MOPP 无明显统计学差异( P>0.05)。POAG患者MOPP波动较对照组大,差异有统计学意义( P<0.05)。由两公式推导所得夜间眼压峰值均与所测值无明显统计学差异(P>0.05)。
　　结论：习惯性体位下POAG组及正常人的眼压峰值多出现在凌晨至上午,POAG患者的习惯性体位平均眼压及眼压波动均高于对照组。两组内夜间灌注压均较日间低,且POAG患者有更大的MOPP波动。由日间眼压推导夜间峰值眼压具有一定的可行性。     

原发性开角型青光眼患者不同体位眼灌注压昼夜波动趋势分析

Objective To characterize the circadian fluctuation of ocular perfusion pressure (OPP) in different position  in patients with newly diagnosed, untreatedprimary open-angle glaucoma（POAG）. Design Cohort study. Participants Nineteen patients with POAG (19 eyes) and eighteen healthy controls (18 eyes) were included in the Peking University Shenzhen Hospital. Methods POAG patients and healthy controls were included and underwent 24-hour monitoring of IOP and blood pressure. On 10:00, 14:00, 18:00 and 22:00 o’clock in the daytime, all the subjects were monitored in sitting position, then POAG patients were monitored again after lying down for 5 minutes. On 2:00, 5:00 and 7:00 o’clock at night all the subjects were monitored in supine position, then POAG patients were monitored again after sitting for 5 minutes. Calculating the mean ocular perfusion pressure (MOPP), the systolic ocular perfusion pressure (SOPP) and diastolic perfusion pressure (DOPP) by the formula and analyzing the data. Main Outcome Measures  MOPP, SOPP, DOPP. Results In both groups of habitual position (sitting position in day and supine position in night), the nocturnal MOPP, SOPP and DOPP were lower than diurnal. In both groups, the nocturnal MOPP was lower than diurnal in habitual position (POAG group t=4.092, P=0.000; healthy group t=4.513, P=0.000). However, there was no obvious difference between those two groups (t=-0.973, P=0.350). POAG group had higher 24-hour fluctuation of MOPP (t=2.204, P=0.039), higher nocturnal fluctuation of SOPP (t=3.097, P=0.018), higher nocturnal and 24-hour fluctuation of DOPP than healthy group, all the differences had statistical significance (all P<0.05).  In POAG group , there was no statistical difference between the nocturnal MOPP and the diurnal MOPP in sitting position or in supine position of 24 h (all P>0.05). POAG group had higher 24-hour mean MOPP in sitting position than in supine position, the difference had statistical significance (t=4.306, P=0.001).  Comparing the MOPP of  POAG group  in habitual position with in sitting position of 24 h, there was no statistical difference(t=-2.101, P=0.080). However, POAG group had higher 24-hour mean MOPP in habitual position than in supine position of 24 h, the difference had statistical significance (t=2.707, P=0.035). Conclusions There circadian fluctuation of  OPP in different position in POAG pations can not be treated as the same. The nocturnal MOPP  was lower than diurnal in habitual position, but there was no obvious difference in the 24h-sitting position and 24h-supine position.  (Ophthalmol CHN, 2017, 26: 20-25）