Using Standardized Oral Examinations to Evaluate General Competencies

Emergency medicine residency programs are required by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) to formally evaluate each resident with oral and written examinations. The Michigan State University Emergency Medicine Residency Program in Lansing conducts monthly standardized oral examinations (SOEs) as part of each resident's evaluation. Recently, the ACGME has advanced six areas, termed "general competencies," that should be acquired during graduate medical education. According to the ACGME, these competencies should be included in the educational process of all residency programs. In promulgating these competencies, the ACGME did not provide examples of core content, strategies for implementation, or methods of evaluation; rather, individual residency programs are required to develop their own methods. The authors describe a modification of an existing SOE strategy that assesses residents' knowledge, skills, experiences, and attitudes as reflected in the general competencies.     

Enhancing employee capacity to prioritize health insurance benefits

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate that employees can gain understanding of the financial constraints involved in designing health insurance benefits. BACKGROUND: While employees who receive their health insurance through the workplace have much at stake as the cost of health insurance rises, they are not necessarily prepared to constructively participate in prioritizing their health insurance benefits in order to limit cost. DESIGN: Structured group exercises. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Employees of 41 public and private organizations in Northern California. INTERVENTION: Administration of the CHAT (Choosing Healthplans All Together) exercise in which participants engage in deliberation to design health insurance benefits under financial constraints. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Change in priorities and attitudes about the need to exercise insurance cost constraints. RESULTS: Participants (N = 744) became significantly more cognizant of the need to limit insurance benefits for the sake of affordability and capable of prioritizing benefit options. Those agreeing that it is reasonable to limit health insurance coverage given the cost increased from 47% to 72%. CONCLUSION: It is both possible and valuable to involve employees in priority setting regarding health insurance benefits through the use of structured decision tools.     

Nursing directors' perceptions of the dental components of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) in nursing homes

¹Professor, Department of Prosthodontics and Dows Institute for Dental Research, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242
The Directors of Nursing (DON's) of all 428 nursing homes in the state of Iowa were sent a pre-tested questionnaire. The aim of the study was to examine the perceptions by nursing directors on the utility of a dental component of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) in identifying residents with dental problems in their facility. The return rate was 55.1% from the DON's. It was reported that 66.4% of the homes had a training program for the MDS and that in 38.0% of the homes there was only one person doing the assessments. The majority (76.0%) of the DON's stated that the MDS was useful in tracking residents and that it did help them to identify dental problems. When asked how often it was useful in the identification of dental needs, only 9% stated that it was often useful. Also, regarding frequency of dental appointments for the residents, a mean of 51.0% of residents were estimated to have received some dental care during the previous year (means of 33.2% at the facility, 22.4% at a dental office, and 0.4% in a hospital). If change is to occur, the dental profession must try to get the nursing home assessors to convince the nursing homes to use the oral/nutritional/dental sections of the MDS as they were intended under the OBRA regulations.