Glycaemic control for patients with severe acute brain injury: Protocol for a systematic review

Background

Hyperglycaemia is common in patients with acute brain injury admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU). Many studies have found associations between development of hyperglycaemia and increased mortality in hospitalised patients. However, the optimal target for blood glucose control is unknown. We want to conduct a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis to explore the beneficial and harmful effects of restrictive versus liberal glucose control on patient outcomes in adults with severe acute brain injury.

Methods

We will systematically search medical databases including CENTRAL, Embase, MEDLINE and trial registries. We will search the following websites for ongoing or unpublished trials: http://www.controlled-trials.com/ , http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ , www.eudraCT.com , http://centerwatch.com/ , The Cochrane Library's CENTRAL, PubMed, EMBASE, Science Citation Index Expanded and CINAHL. Two authors will independently review and select trials and extract data. We will include randomised trials comparing levels of glucose control in our analyses and observational studies will be included to address potential harms. The primary outcomes are defined as all-cause mortality, functional outcome and health-related quality of life. Secondary outcomes include serious adverse events including hypoglycaemia, length of ICU stay and duration of mechanical ventilation, and explorative outcomes including intracranial pressure and infection. Trial Sequential Analysis will be used to investigate the risk of type I error due to repetitive testing and to further explore imprecision. Quality of trials will be evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool, and quality of evidence will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) approach.

Discussion

The results of the systematic review will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication. With the review, we hope to inform future randomised clinical trials and improve clinical practice.     

Sex Disparities in Risk of Mortality Among Children With ESRD

1. Download high-res image (377KB)
2. Download full-size image

     

Wound infection following high saphenous ligation. A trial comparing two skin closure techniques: subcuticular polyglycolic acid and interrupted monofilament nylon mattress sutures.

A prospective, randomized trial was performed to compare the incidence of wound infection following skin closure with subcuticular polyglycolic acid and interrupted monofilament nylon mattress sutures in patients undergoing high saphenous ligation (126 patients; 75 polyglycolic acid wounds, 86 interrupted monofilament nylon mattress wounds). By 6 weeks after operation, pus had discharged from 15 (20%) polyglycolic acid wounds compared with seven (8%) interrupted monofilament nylon mattress wounds (P = 0.05), giving an overall infection rate of 13.7%. Infection occurred in 23% of the 56 procedures performed by the two surgeons with the highest infection rates compared with 8% of the 105 procedures performed by the remaining nine surgeons (P = 0.02). The excess of infections in wounds closed with subcuticular polyglycolic acid was caused by an excess of infections in operations performed by the two surgeons with the highest infection rates. The higher infection rate found with subcuticular polyglycolic acid appeared to be operator dependent.