Parental Attitudes Toward Breastfeeding: Their Association with Feeding Outcome at Hospital Discharge

Abstract: Background : A woman chooses to breastfeed for many reasons. Recent research, however, suggests that parental attitudes toward breastfeeding are stronger predictors of infant feeding choice than commonly cited sociodemographic factors. The objective of the current study was to compare the infant feeding attitudes of expectant couples, and to determine to what degree their individual attitudes during early pregnancy were predictive of the method of infant feeding at discharge from hospital. Methods : A convenience sample of pregnant women (gestational age 8–12 weeks), who were attending maternity clinics in Glasgow, Scotland, in 2000, completed the 17‐item Iowa Infant Feeding Attitude Scale (IIFAS), together with their partners. Results : The IIFAS was completed by 108 expectant couples. At discharge from hospital 49.1 percent of women were exclusively breastfeeding, and 50.9 percent were exclusively formula‐feeding. A woman's total infant feeding attitude score was significantly correlated with her partner's score(r = 0.67, p < 0.001). There was no difference in the infant feeding attitudes of formula‐feeding couples(p = 0.987), but breastfeeding women tended to be more supportive of breastfeeding than their partners(p = 0.022). Maternal, but not paternal, infant feeding attitude was a significant predictor of the choice of feeding method (OR = 1.16 95% CI = 1.09–1.24). Conclusions : Infant feeding attitudes tended to be shared by expectant couples. Maternal infant feeding attitude was a better predictor of feeding choice than were demographic factors. Paternal attitudes were not found to be independently associated with feeding choice. Identification of women with neutral infant feeding attitudes using the IIFAS may be an effective way of targeting interventions at those women who are most likely to be receptive to such programs.     

The role of nitrinergic connections in central cardiovascular responses mediated by physostigmine infused into posterior hypothalamus

In the last few decades, cholinergic connections located into posterior hypothalamus (PH) have been implicated in the central regulation of blood pressure (BP). Here we investigated the role of nitric oxide (NO) in the blood pressure response elicited by infusion of physostigmine into PH of normotensive rats. In freely moving rats, physostigmine (60-200 nM) produced a dose- and time-dependent elevation of BP which was antagonized by the antimuscarinic drug scopolamine (60 nM) and by L-NAME (100 microM), an inhibitor of NO synthase, both infused into the same site. In contrast, L-arginine (L-Arg; 100 microM), the precursor of NO, and glyceryltrinitrate (GTN; 140 nM), an NO donor, infused into the PH did not affect physostigmine-related pressor response. In rats pre-treated with Escherichia coli lipopolisaccharide (LPS; 0.5 microg i.p. 24h beforehand), however, scopolamine, L-Arg and GTN produced a decrease of BP, an effect antagonized by L-NAME. This suggests that NO only slightly modulates physostigmine-related pressor response elicited into PH of LPS-untreated rats. In contrast, the release of large amounts of NO generated by pre-treating rats with LPS, down-regulates cholinergic connections located at the PH, thus contributing in the central dysregulation of BP which can be found when high circulating endotoxin levels may occur.     

The effect of omalizumab on nasal allergic inflammation

BACKGROUND: In sensitized patients, coupling between IgE and FcepsilonRI receptors on mast cells leads to release of proinflammatory mediators and a subsequent influx of inflammatory cells to the affected organ. Omalizumab (Xolair; formerly rhuMAb-E25) binds to circulating IgE, thus preventing induction of the allergic process. OBJECTIVE: We investigated the effect of treatment with omalizumab on seasonal allergic rhinitis and related changes in inflammatory cell numbers in nasal biopsy specimens. METHODS: Patients were randomized to treatment with omalizumab or placebo before the pollen season; the treatment was started and continued during season. Symptoms and use of medication were recorded, and blood samples and nasal biopsy specimens were obtained before and during season. Immunocytochemistry was performed on biopsy sections through use of the following antibodies: anti-CD4, CD8 (T lymphocytes), EG2, and anti-eosinophil peroxidase (eosinophils), anti-tryptase (mast cells), human neutrophil lipocalin (neutrophils), and antibodies against IgE and FcepsilonRI. RESULTS: During the season, blood eosinophils increased in placebo-treated patients but not in omalizumab-treated patients (P =.01); the difference between the treatment groups was significant (P =.04). Free IgE in serum decreased significantly (P =.0002) in omalizumab-treated patients but not in placebo-treated patients; the difference between the groups was significant (P =.0001). In nasal biopsy specimens, the number of eosinophil peroxidase-positive staining cells increased in the placebo-treated patients (P =.003) but not in the actively treated patients during the season; the difference between the groups was significant (P =.0001). The number of IgE(+) staining cells decreased significantly in the omalizumab group during the season in comparison with the placebo group (P =.04). CONCLUSION: The clinical benefit of treatment with omalizumab is associated with an anti-inflammatory effect on cellular markers in blood and nasal tissue.     

Two HLA—D and DR Alleles are Associated with Coeliac Disease

A group of 45 children affected with Coeliac Disease (CD) was typed for HLA-A, B, C, D, and DR specificities. The most significant associations were found with two alleles of the D series, with both cellular and serological typing. It is suggested that the susceptibility to CD is determined by two different genes within the HLA region, the first in common with organ-specific autoimmune diseases and associated with DW3, the second possibly specific for CD and associated with Dw7.     

Emergence and Spread of SARS-CoV-2 Lineages B.1.1.7 and P.1 in Italy

Italy’s second wave of SARS-CoV-2 has hit hard, with more than three million cases and over 100,000 deaths, representing an almost ten-fold increase in the numbers reported by August 2020. Herein, we present an analysis of 6515 SARS-CoV-2 sequences sampled in Italy between 29 January 2020 and 1 March 2021 and show how different lineages emerged multiple times independently despite lockdown restrictions. Virus lineage B.1.177 became the dominant variant in November 2020, when cases peaked at 40,000 a day, but since January 2021 this is being replaced by the B.1.1.7 ‘variant of concern’. In addition, we report a sudden increase in another documented variant of concern—lineage P.1—from December 2020 onwards, most likely caused by a single introduction into Italy. We again highlight how international importations drive the emergence of new lineages and that genome sequencing should remain a top priority for ongoing surveillance in Italy.     

Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies in an area of northeastern Italy with a high incidence of COVID-19 cases: a population-based study

ObjectivesA seroprevalence study of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was conducted in a high-incidence area located in northeastern Italy.MethodsAll citizens above 10 years of age resident in five municipalities of the Autonomous Province of Trento, with the highest incidence of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases, were invited to participate in the study. Among 6098 participants, 6075 sera and a standardized questionnaire administered face-to-face were collected between 5 May and 15 May 2020 and examined. Symptomatic individuals and their family contacts were tested by RT-PCR. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were detected using an Abbott SARS-CoV-2 IgG assay, which was performed on the Abbott Architect i2000SR automated analyser. Seroprevalence was calculated as the proportion of positive results among the total number tested. A multivariable logistic regression model was performed to assess the relationship between seropositive versus seronegative individuals for a set of explanatory variables.ResultsA total of 1402 participants were positive for IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV-2, with a prevalence of 23.1% (1402/6075). The highest prevalence was found in the age class 40–49 years. Overall, 34.4% (2096/6098) of the participants reported at least one symptom. The ratio between reported cases identified by molecular test and those with seropositive results was 1:3, with a maximum ratio of about 1:7 in the age group <20 years and a minimum around 1:1 in those >70 years old. The infection fatality rate was 2.5% (35/1402). Among the symptoms, anosmia and ageusia were strongly associated with seropositivity.ConclusionsThe estimated seroprevalence of 23% was three-fold higher than the number of cases reported in the COVID-19 Integrated Surveillance data in the study area. This may be explained in part by a relatively high number of individuals presenting mild or no illness, especially those of younger age, and people who did not seek medical care or testing, but who may contribute to virus transmission in the community.     

Weaning from neonatal and pediatric ECMO with stand-by cannula

Journal of Artificial Organs - The precise moment for weaning a patient off extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is not always easy to establish. Also, mechanical causes may obligate to...