Spinal anesthesia for endoscopic urological surgery--low dose vs. varying doses of hyperbaric bupivacaine

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to compare the efficiency of low dose vs. varying doses of hyperbaric bupivacaine in spinal anesthesia for endoscopic urological procedures. METHODS: Sixty consecutive patients were studied in a randomized prospective manner. They received either of 5 (Gr I), 7.5 (Gr II) or 10 mg (Gr III) of hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% combined with 25 microg of fentanyl, through a 25-gauge W hitacre spinal needle placed in the L3-L4 interspace. Characteristics of sensory and motor block, dose of ephedrine required, secondary effects, the patients, and the surgeons satisfaction, were noted. RESULTS: The maximum number of blocked segments was 14 +/- 1 (Gr I), 15 +/- 2 (Gr II) and 16 +/- 2 (Gr III). Time to T12 regression was significantly shorter for Gr I (53 +/- 13 min) than for Gr II (69 +/- 20 min) or Gr III (94 +/- 14 min). Bromage 3 block was not found in Gr I compared to 4 patients in Gr II and 15 patients in Gr III. The duration of motor block was shorter in Gr 1(51 +/- 18 min) than in Gr II (86 +/- 19 min) and in Gr III (138 +/- 21 min). Ephedrine was used for 16 patients in Gr III (9.8 +/- 12.2 mg), 5 patients in Gr II (3.7 +/- 7.8 mg) and 2 patients in Gr I (0.5 +/- 1.5 mg). The difference is statistically significant between Gr III and the other groups. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the use of a low dose of bupivacaine (5 mg) added to fentanyl (25 microg) for endoscopic urological surgery, resulted in short-acting sensory block, without motor block and a lower incidence of cardiovascular side effects, as compared to either of 7.5 or 10 mg bupivacaine with 25 microg fentanyl.     

Successful use of levosimendan in a patient with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction

Levosimendan is a new inodilator that improves cardiac contractility by sensitizing troponin C to calcium. This drug has proved to be effective in treating advanced congestive heart failure but has not been evaluated in cardiogenic shock. We present the case of a 54-year-old male patient treated successfully with levosimendan for cardiogenic shock following acute myocardial infarction. Treatment with dobulamine. revascularisation and itra-aortic balloon conterpulsation had first failed to improve his hemodynamic variables. Levosimendan induced a steady decline of increased pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, followed by an increase in cardiac index and mixed venous oxygen saturation. Left ventricular ejection fraction improved from 25% to 47%. Infusion of levosimendan can be used in cardiogenic shock without side effects and to improve hemodynamics and left ventricular function.     

Pratiques de la transfusion massive en Tunisie et proposition de protocole

Introduction: Massive transfusion (MT) is a life-saving therapy in situations of major hemorrhage awaiting radical haemostatic treatment. Poor management and control of this therapy may, however, compromise the patient’s vital prognosis. The main aim of our study was to take stock of massive transfusion practices in Tunisia. The secondary aim was to propose a massive transfusion protocol. Methods: An analytical observational study based on a questionnaire was conducted. We targeted physicians brought in their clinical practice to use MT. Results: A total of 124 clinicians responded to the questionnaire. The majority (62%) were anesthesiologists or emergency physicians. More than half of the participants were residents (51%). The use of MT based on a clinical or biological score was only found for a minority (13%). The initial order was for the majority of participants (N=69) made up of red blood cell concentrates (RBC) and fresh frozen plasma (FFP). The FFP: RBC ratio was1:2 for 51% of the participants. A higher ratio was adopted by the rest. Respectively 23.5% and 9.6% of participants transfused platelets and fibrinogen concentrates without waiting for the result of biology. The use of tranexamic acid was systematically advocated by 60.5% of clinicians. The majority (86.3%) adopted a restrictive transfusion strategy (target hemoglobin between 7 and 9 g/dl). The latter was more adopted by the youngest physicians (92.1% of residents versus 55.6% of professors; p=0.008). Conclusions: The professional practices of MT in Tunisia are heterogeneous. Given the lack of a clear institutionalized procedure which frames this therapy, a MT protocol has thus been proposed.     

Distribution of the probability of survival is a strategic issue for randomized trials in critically ill patients

BACKGROUND: Many randomized clinical trials in trauma have failed to demonstrate a significant improvement in survival rate. Using a trauma patient database, we simulated what could happen in a trial designed to improve survival rate in this setting. METHODS: The predicted probability of survival was assessed using the TRISS methodology in 350 severely injured trauma patients. Using this probability of survival, the authors simulated the effects of a drug that may increase the probability of survival by 10-50% and calculated the number of patients to be included in a triad, assuming alpha = 0.05 and beta = 0.10 by using the percentage of survivors or the individual probability of survival. Other distributions (Gaussian, J shape, uniform) of the probability of survival were also simulated and tested. RESULTS: The distribution of the probability of survival was bimodal with two peaks (< 0.10 and > 0.90). There were major discrepancies between the number of patients to be included when considering the percentage of survivors or the individual value of the probability of survival: 63,202 versus 2,848 if the drug increases the probability of survival by 20%. This discrepancy also occurred in other types of distribution (uniform, J shape) but to a lesser degree, whereas it was very limited in a Gaussian distribution. CONCLUSIONS: The bimodal distribution of the probability of survival in trauma patients has major consequences on hypothesis testing, leading to overestimation of the power. This statistical pitfall may also occur in other critically ill patients.     

Distribution of the Probability of Survival Is a Strategic Issue for Randomized Trials in Critically Ill Patients

Background: Many randomized clinical trials in trauma have failed to demonstrate a significant improvement in survival rate. Using a trauma patient database, we simulated what could happen in a trial designed to improve survival rate in this setting.

Methods: The predicted probability of survival was assessed using the TRISS methodology in 350 severely injured trauma patients. Using this probability of survival, the authors simulated the effects of a drug that may increase the probability of survival by 10-50% and calculated the number of patients to be included in a triad, assuming [alpha] = 0.05 and [beta] = 0.10 by using the percentage of survivors or the individual probability of survival. Other distributions (Gaussian, J shape, uniform) of the probability of survival were also simulated and tested.

Results: The distribution of the probability of survival was bimodal with two peaks (< 0.10 and > 0.90). There were major discrepancies between the number of patients to be included when considering the percentage of survivors or the individual value of the probability of survival: 63,202 versus 2,848 if the drug increases the probability of survival by 20%. This discrepancy also occurred in other types of distribution (uniform, J shape) but to a lesser degree, whereas it was very limited in a Gaussian distribution.     

Nodular hidradenoma in a 19-year-old woman

Hidradenomas are rare adnexal tumors. Recently, two groups have been individualized: those with eccrine differentiation called poroid hidradenoma and those with apocrine differentiation called clear-cell hidradenoma or nodular hidradenoma. Herein we report a case of 19-year old woman with a nodular hidradenoma of the scapular region. Our report highlights the clinic-pathological characteristics of these tumors and emphasizes the benefit of complete local excision to prevent risk of recurrence and possible malignant potential.