排序方式: 共有3条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1
1.
Hanna-Maria Roitto Hannu Kautiainen Ulla L. Aalto Hannareeta Öhman Jouko Laurila Kaisu H. Pitkälä 《Journal of the American Medical Directors Association》2019,20(3):305-311
Objectives
The use of psychotropic drugs in long-term care (LTC) is very common, despite their known adverse effects. The prevalence of opioid use is growing among older adults. This study aimed to investigate trends in the prevalence of psychotropics, opioids, and sedative load in a LTC setting over a 14-year period. We also explored the interaction of psychotropic and opioid use according to residents’ dementia status in nursing home (NH) and assisted living facility (ALF) settings.Design
Four cross-sectional studies.Setting
Institutional settings in Helsinki, Finland.Participants
Older residents in NHs in 2003 (n = 1987), 2011 (n = 1576), and 2017 (n = 791) and in ALFs in 2007 (n = 1377), 2011 (n = 1586), and 2017 (n = 1624).Measures
Comparable assessments were conducted among LTC residents at 4 time points over 14 years. The prevalence of regular psychotropics, opioids, and other sedatives and data on demographics and diagnoses were collected from medical records.Results
Disabilities and severity of dementia increased in both settings over time. The prevalence of all psychotropics decreased significantly in NHs (from 81% in 2003 to 61% in 2017), whereas in ALFs there was no similar linear trend (65% in 2007 and 64% in 2017). There was a significant increase in the prevalence of opioids in both settings (30% in NHs and 22% in AFLs in 2017). Residents with dementia used less psychotropics and opioids than those without dementia in both settings and at each time point.Conclusions/Implications
NHs show a favorable trend in psychotropic drug use, but the rates of psychotropic use remain high in both NHs and ALFs. In addition, the rates of opioid use have almost tripled, leading to a high sedative load among LTC residents. Clinicians should carefully consider the risk-to-benefit ratio when prescribing in LTC. 相似文献2.
Ulla L. Aalto Harriet Finne-Soveri Hannu Kautiainen Hanna-Maria Roitto Hannareeta Öhman Kaisu H. Pitkälä 《Journal of the American Medical Directors Association》2019,20(9):1156-1162
ObjectivesTo compare 3 internationally established criteria for drugs with anticholinergic properties (DAPs) and their associated factors in long-term care facilities, and to investigate the association between use of DAPs and psychological well-being (PWB) or mortality.DesignCross-sectional study and 1-year follow-up of all-cause mortality.Setting and ParticipantsOf all 4449 residents living in long-term care facilities in Helsinki in 2011, 2432 (≥65 years of age) participated after exclusion of residents with severe dementia.MeasurementsData on demographics, medication use, and active diagnoses were collected by trained staff using structured questionnaires. DAP use was defined by the following 3 international criteria: Chew's list, the Anticholinergic Risk Scale, and the Anticholinergic Drug Scale. The total number of DAPs was counted and referred to as anticholinergic burden. PWB was assessed by a questionnaire and yielded a score ranging from 0 to 1. Mortality data was retrieved from central registers.ResultsOf all participants, 85% were DAP users according to at least 1 of the 3 criteria used. Overlap between the 3 criteria was only moderate. DAP users were younger and a larger proportion of them had better cognition. However, they suffered more often from depression and other psychiatric diagnoses than nonusers. DAP users had lower PWB scores than those not using DAPs, and PWB decreased linearly in the overlapping groups from nonusers to those using DAPs according to all 3 criteria. The total number of DAPs used predicted mortality.Conclusions and ImplicationsDAP use and PWB appear to be negatively associated. When combining several criteria of DAPs, their burden predicted mortality. Clinicians should carefully consider the potential benefits and harms when prescribing DAPs to older persons. 相似文献
3.
Ulla Liisa Aalto Hanna-Maria Roitto Harriet Finne-Soveri Hannu Kautiainen Kaisu Pitkälä 《Journal of the American Medical Directors Association》2018,19(6):511-515
Objectives
To assess the burden of drugs with anticholinergic properties (DAPs) and associated factors in long-term care facilities and to explore how psychological well-being and mortality are associated with the use of DAPs.Design
Cross-sectional study and 1-year follow-up of all-cause mortality.Setting and Participants
All 4449 older people (>65 years of age) living in nursing homes and assisted living facilities in Helsinki in 2011 were recruited. After refusals and excluding residents with severe dementia, 2432 participants remained.Measurements
Data on demographics, drug use, and medical history were collected by trained nurses using a structured assessment. Psychological well-being (PWB) of participants was assessed by 6 questions resulting in a validated PWB score (range 0–1). Mortality data were retrieved from central registers. The total number of anticholinergic drugs was determined according to the Anticholinergic Risk Scale.Results
Of the participants, 51% used at least 1 DAP. DAP users were younger and had better cognition than nonusers. There was a linear relationship between the number of DAPs used and poorer PWB. A similar trend was present between the number of DAPs and poorer PWB both among those with and without depression and among those with and without functional dependency. No difference in mortality existed between DAP users and nonusers.Conclusions
Despite DAP users being younger and having better cognition, they had poorer PWB. Clinicians should carefully consider the potential benefits and harm when prescribing DAPs to older people. 相似文献
1