Patient navigation across the cancer care continuum: An overview of systematic reviews and emerging literature

Patient navigation is a strategy for overcoming barriers to reduce disparities and to improve access and outcomes. The aim of this umbrella review was to identify, critically appraise, synthesize, and present the best available evidence to inform policy and planning regarding patient navigation across the cancer continuum. Systematic reviews examining navigation in cancer care were identified in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PubMed, Embase, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health (CINAHL), Epistemonikos, and Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) databases and in the gray literature from January 1, 2012, to April 19, 2022. Data were screened, extracted, and appraised independently by two authors. The JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Systematic Review and Research Syntheses was used for quality appraisal. Emerging literature up to May 25, 2022, was also explored to capture primary research published beyond the coverage of included systematic reviews. Of the 2062 unique records identified, 61 systematic reviews were included. Fifty-four reviews were quantitative or mixed-methods reviews, reporting on the effectiveness of cancer patient navigation, including 12 reviews reporting costs or cost-effectiveness outcomes. Seven qualitative reviews explored navigation needs, barriers, and experiences. In addition, 53 primary studies published since 2021 were included. Patient navigation is effective in improving participation in cancer screening and reducing the time from screening to diagnosis and from diagnosis to treatment initiation. Emerging evidence suggests that patient navigation improves quality of life and patient satisfaction with care in the survivorship phase and reduces hospital readmission in the active treatment and survivorship care phases. Palliative care data were extremely limited. Economic evaluations from the United States suggest the potential cost-effectiveness of navigation in screening programs.     

Causes of Death and Risk Factors for Mortality in Patients With Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to assess the causes of death and risk factors for mortality in a cohort of patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).Patients and methodsWe studied 203 patients with severe COPD (forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV₁] <50%), who were attended in our respiratory department day hospital (2001-2006). Clinical variables were recorded on inclusion, and clinical course and causes of death were retrospectively reviewed.ResultsThe mean (SD) age of patients was 69 (8) years and the mean FEV₁ was 30.8% (8.2%). One-hundred and nine patients died (53.7%); death was attributed to respiratory causes in 72 (80.9%), with COPD exacerbation being the most frequent specific cause within this category (48.3%). During follow-up, 18.7% required admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). Survival at 1, 3, and 5 years was 80%, 53%, and 26%, respectively. The multivariate analysis showed that mortality was associated with age, stage IV classification according to the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD), cor pulmonale, and hospital admission during the year prior to inclusion. Need for admission to the ICU during follow-up was a factor independently associated with higher mortality.ConclusionsMortality in patients with severe COPD was high and exacerbation of the disease was one of the most frequent causes of death. Age, GOLD stage, cor pulmonale, prior admission to hospital, and need for admission to the ICU during follow-up were independent predictors of mortality.