The future of outcomes measurement: item banking,tailored short-forms,and computerized adaptive assessment

The use of item banks and computerized adaptive testing (CAT) begins with clear definitions of important outcomes, and references those definitions to specific questions gathered into large and well-studied pools, or “banks” of items. Items can be selected from the bank to form customized short scales, or can be administered in a sequence and length determined by a computer programmed for precision and clinical relevance. Although far from perfect, such item banks can form a common definition and understanding of human symptoms and functional problems such as fatigue, pain, depression, mobility, social function, sensory function, and many other health concepts that we can only measure by asking people directly. The support of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), as witnessed by its cooperative agreement with measurement experts through the NIH Roadmap Initiative known as PROMIS (www.nihpromis.org), is a big step in that direction. Our approach to item banking and CAT is practical; as focused on application as it is on science or theory. From a practical perspective, we frequently must decide whether to re-write and retest an item, add more items to fill gaps (often at the ceiling of the measure), re-test a bank after some modifications, or split up a bank into units that are more unidimensional, yet less clinically relevant or complete. These decisions are not easy, and yet they are rarely unforgiving. We encourage people to build practical tools that are capable of producing multiple short form measures and CAT administrations from common banks, and to further our understanding of these banks with various clinical populations and ages, so that with time the scores that emerge from these many activities begin to have not only a common metric and range, but a shared meaning and understanding across users. In this paper, we provide an overview of item banking and CAT, discuss our approach to item banking and its byproducts, describe testing options, discuss an example of CAT for fatigue, and discuss models for long term sustainability of an entity such as PROMIS. Some barriers to success include limitations in the methods themselves, controversies and disagreements across approaches, and end-user reluctance to move away from the familiar.     

Psychometric validation of the revised Functional Assessment of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection (FAHI) quality of life instrument

The revised Functional Assessment of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection (FAHI) quality of life (QoL) instrument has been updated and expanded to provide more complete and accurate coverage of human immune deficiency virus/ acquired immune deficiency syndrome (HIV/AIDS)-related QoL. Factor analysis and the Rasch measurement model were used to determine a new subscale structure for the FAHI. The content of these subscales, including physical well-being (ten items, = 0.91), function and global well-being (13 items, = 0.86), emotional well-being/living with HIV (10 items, = 0.82), social well-being (eight items, = 0.73), and cognitive functioning (three items; = 0.75), reflect both general illness- and HIV/AIDS-specific QoL concerns: a total QoL score can also be calculated for the FAHI (44 items, =0.91). Psychometric evaluation revealed good internal consistency reliability for the FAHI and its subscales. In addition, construct validity, known groups validity and sensitivity to change were demonstrated by significant associations between the FAHI and additional indicators of functional status, psychological symptoms, stress and illness severity. In summary, the FAHI is a psychometrically sound instrument that captures multiple important dimensions of HIV/AIDS-related QoL. It is brief, easy to administer and score, has been translated into nine languages other than English and is appropriate for use in clinical trials and clinical practice.     

Data collection strategies for patient-reported information

The U.S. health care transition demands increased accountability for medical care. This has contributed to increased interest in documenting medical outcomes, including improvements in health-related quality of life and treatment satisfaction. These data can only be obtained by asking patients directly about their current health state, perception of well-being, and satisfaction with care. Systematic collection of patient-reported data is often poorly done because its demands are underestimated and inadequately supported. Rigorous quality assurance is critical in any clinical trial or treatment delivery evaluation program.     

Effect of enhancement of cholinergic tone on the growth hormone response to acute hyperglycaemia or thyrotropin-releasing hormone in dogs

The effect of enhancement of cholinergic tone by pyridostigmine on the growth hormone (GH) response to thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) or glucose-induced acute hyperglycaemia was tested in six adult unanaesthetized beagle dogs. Both TRH (5μg/ kg iv) and glucose (2 g/kg orally) did not significantly alter baseline GH levels but reduced the GH response to GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) (2 μg/kg iv), although this effect was more clear-cut with TRH than with glucose. Pretreatment with pyridostigmine (2 mg/kg orally) counteracted the inhibitory effect of hyperglycaemia on the GHRH-induced GH release, but had no effect on the inhibition induced by TRH. In summary, these results indicate that: 1) acute hyperglycaemia and TRH play an inhibitory role on GHRH-stimulated GH secretion in dogs; 2) the inhibitory effect of acute hyperglycaemia is mediated via hypothalamic cholinergic neurotransmission, whereas other neurotransmitter pathways would be. involved in the effect of TRH.     

Molsidomine antagonizes L-NAME-induced acquisition deficits in a recognition memory task in the rat.

The present study was designed to investigate the role of nitric oxide (NO) on the acquisition of a recognition memory task in the rat. For this purpose, the effects on memory exerted by pre-training administration of the NO synthase inhibitor L-NAME (N(omega)-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester) and the NO donor molsidomine (N-[ethoxycarbonyl]-3-[4-morpholinosydnomine]) were assessed by using the object recognition task, a working memory paradigm based on the differential exploration of a new and familiar object. In a first dose-response study, it was found that L-NAME (10, 30, and 60 mg kg(-1), i.p.) at 30 but not at 10 mg kg(-1) disrupted animals performance, whereas the dose of 60 mg kg(-1) induced side effects. Molsidomine (2 and 4 mg kg(-1), i.p.) at 4 but not at 2 mg kg(-1), antagonized the L-NAME-induced performance deficits. These results indicate that NO is involved in the acquisition of a recognition memory task.