A comparison of the stressors experienced by parents of intubated and non-intubated children

When children are ill enough to require admission to paediatric intensive care, parents may become distressed about their child's medical condition and this distress may be compounded by the unfamiliar nature of the highly technological environment Parents of children who are sick enough to warrant intubation are particularly likely to be exposed to a frightening array of technological equipment Seventy-one parents of intubated and non-intubated children completed the Parental Stressor Scale Paediatnc Intensive Care Unit (PSS PICU) Overall the findings suggest that parents were most distressed (a) by the painful procedures to which their children were subjected, (b) by the sights and sounds of the intensive care unit and (c) by their children's reactions to intensive care The behaviour of staff towards parents and the way that staff communicated with them caused the least distress When the levels of stress reported by parents of intubated children were compared with those reported by parents of non-intubated children, different patterns of stress were found Painful procedures were a source of greater stress to parents of intubated children whereas the behaviour of staff and the children's reactions to the intensive care experience caused greater stress to the parents of the non-intubated children In general the findings suggest that the needs of parents of non-intubated children are being overlooked, with staff focusing more of their attention on the parents of intubated children     

Addressing alcohol and other drug use among young people from migrant and ethnic minority backgrounds: Perspectives of service providers in Melbourne,Australia

Young people from migrant and ethnic minority backgrounds are recognised as emerging priority populations for reducing alcohol and other drug (AOD)-related harms in Australia. Limited research has investigated how service providers address AOD challenges in migrant communities. In this qualitative study, we interviewed 15 service providers from AOD, migrant support, community and other health services in a diverse region of Melbourne. Interviews explored the challenges that service providers faced and the strategies they implemented to engage with young migrants in relation to AOD use. Thematic analysis was used to generate four themes: stigma as a barrier to service delivery, intergenerational differences between young people and parents, the need for outreach and establishing trust and understanding over time. Service providers believed that stigma prevented many young people from migrant backgrounds having open conversations about their AOD use with family members and professionals. Participants perceived that some parents had less AOD-related knowledge and lower English language proficiency than their children creating challenges for effective communication. Service providers recognised the importance of engaging with young people in settings where they felt comfortable rather than expecting them to approach their service. Participants also acknowledged the need to invest time in establishing trust and understanding with young migrants so they could facilitate conversations about AOD use as relationships evolved. Although service providers had a strong understanding of young people's needs, they found it challenging to build relationships in the context of funding and time constraints. Our results indicate the need for long-term funding and timelines that enable service providers to build strong relationships with young migrants, their families and their broader cultural communities to facilitate access to AOD support.     

Endovascular versus open approach to aortic aneurysm repair surgery: rates of postoperative delirium

Purpose

Our objective was to compare open and endovascular aortic aneurysm repair with respect to postoperative delirium.

Methods

After Institutional Ethics Review Board approval, we conducted a retrospective review of all patients who underwent abdominal and thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysm repair surgery at Toronto General Hospital during June 2006 to December 2007. Patients were classed into either the OPEN or the endovascular (EVAR) group based on the type of surgery and were assessed for the presence of delirium after surgery. The NEECHAM Confusion Scale and the validated chart review instrument were used for diagnosis of delirium. Patients with dementia and/or abnormal levels of consciousness preoperatively were excluded.

Results

There were 256 patients included in the study, 149 (58%) in the OPEN group and 107 (42%) in the EVAR group. Patients in the EVAR group were considerably older, 74 (10) yr vs 68 (9) yr, and they had shorter duration of surgery, 150 [119, 180] min vs 200 [165, 260] min, respectively, P?<?0.0001. Postoperative delirium was present in 43 (29%) patients in the OPEN group and 14 (13%) patients in the EVAR group (95% confidence interval [CI], 22 to 36 vs 95% CI, 7 to 19, respectively; P?=?0.003). Hospital length of stay was 8.3 [6.6, 13.4] days in the OPEN group and 4.5 [3.1, 6.4] days in the EVAR group, P?<?0.0001.

Conclusions

Perioperative management of patients undergoing endovascular aortic aneurysm repair was associated with lower rates of delirium after surgery than that of patients undergoing open aortic aneurysm repair.