A novel model to study bacterial adherence to the transplanted airway: Inhibition of Burkholderia cepacia adherence to human airway by dextran and xylitol

BACKGROUND: Lung infection with Burkholderia cepacia complex before lung transplantation in patients with cystic fibrosis is a major risk factor for decreased post-operative survival rates compared with those of patients colonized with the more common opportunistic pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Because adherence to mucosal surfaces is an important initial step in infection, we investigated the use of non-toxic neutral polysaccharides and a sugar alcohol to prevent adherence of B cepacia complex to allograft airway epithelium. METHODS: We used human airway explants prepared from donor tracheobronchial tissue to test the effect of dextrans and xylitol in inhibiting the binding of Burkholderia cepacia complex. We used immunofluorescence and electron microscopy to determine the distribution of bacteria in the explants. RESULTS: Burkholderia cepacia complex bound to the explants and was found only in the surface mucus layer. Dextran 40 kd applied before adding the bacteria decreased the number of bound organisms by 80% to 99%. Smaller molecular mass dextrans (4 and 20 kd) were ineffective. Xylitol inhibited bacterial binding by 67% to 85%. Both agents seemed to decrease the thickness of the surface mucus, suggesting that they may indirectly inhibit bacterial binding by removing adherent surface mucus. CONCLUSIONS: Treating donor lungs with dextran 40 kd or xylitol before (and possibly after) surgery may inhibit the adherence of Burkholderia cepacia complex to airways and may prevent or decrease subsequent infection of the allografts.     

Neonatal candidial endocarditis--a rare manifestation of systemic candidiasis

Infective candidial endocarditis in four premature neonates is reported. These occurred as a complication of systemic candidiasis. Vegetations were present on the right side of the heart in two cases and both sides in the other two. Diagnosis requires a high degree of clinical suspicion. Mortality rate is high despite appropriate therapy.     

Genetic variability of begomoviruses associated with cotton leaf curl disease originating from India

Summary. Cotton leaf curl disease (CLCuD) causing viruses belong to the Begomovirus genus of the family Geminiviridae. Most begomoviruses are bipartite with two molecules of circular single stranded DNA (A and B) encapsidated in icosahedral geminate particles. However, the begomoviruses associated with CLCuD have DNA- instead of DNA-B. In this communication we report the complete genomic sequence of DNA-A component of two CLCuD-causing begomoviruses, cotton leaf curl Kokhran virus-Dabawali (CLCuKV-Dab), tomato leaf curl Bangalore virus-Cotton [Fatehabad] (ToLCBV-Cotton [Fat]) and partial sequences of two other isolates cotton leaf curl Rajasthan virus-Bangalore (CLCuRV-Ban) and cotton leaf curl Kokhran virus-Ganganagar (CLCuKV-Gang). A phylogenetic analysis of these isolates along with other related begomoviruses showed that ToLCBV-Cotton [Fat] isolate was closest to the tomato leaf curl Bangalore virus-5 (ToLCBV-Ban5) where as CLCuKV-Dab isolate was close to the cotton leaf curl Kokhran virus-Faisalabad1 (CLCuKV-Fai1), cotton leaf curl Kokhran virus-72b (CLCuKV-72b) and cotton leaf curl Kokhran virus-806b (CLCuKV-806b) isolates from Pakistan. The phylogenetic analysis further showed that the ToLCBV-Cotton [Fat] and CLCuKV-Dab isolates along with CLCuKV-Fai1, CLCuKV-72b and CLCuKV-806b are closer to the ToLCBV, tomato leaf curl Gujarat virus (ToLCGV), tomato leaf curl Gujarat virus-Varanasi (ToLCGV-Var) and tomato leaf curl Sri Lanka virus (ToLCSLV) isolates, where as cotton leaf curl Alabad virus-804a (CLCuAV-804a), cotton leaf curl Multhan virus (CLCuMV) cluster with the isolates from cotton leaf curl Rajasthan virus (CLCuRV) and okra yellow vein mosaic virus (OYVMV). These results demonstrate the extensive variability observed in this group of viruses. The AC4 ORF is the least conserved among these viruses. In order to further asses the variability in the CLCuD-causing begomoviruses, the region showing minimum similarity in the DNA-A sequence was first determined by a comparison of segments of different lengths of the aligned sequences. The results indicated that region 2411–424 (771nt) was the least conserved. A phylogenetic tree constructed using the sequences of all the CLCuD causing begomoviruses, corresponding to the least conserved region showed that they form two distinct clusters.     

Classification of clear-cell sarcoma as a subtype of melanoma by genomic profiling.

PURPOSE: To develop a genome-based classification scheme for clear-cell sarcoma (CCS), also known as melanoma of soft parts (MSP), which would have implications for diagnosis and treatment. This tumor displays characteristic features of soft tissue sarcoma (STS), including deep soft tissue primary location and a characteristic translocation, t(12;22)(q13;q12), involving EWS and ATF1 genes. CCS/MSP also has typical melanoma features, including immunoreactivity for S100 and HMB45, pigmentation, MITF-M expression, and a propensity for regional lymph node metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: RNA samples from 21 cell lines and 60 pathologically confirmed cases of STS, melanoma, and CCS/MSP were examined using the U95A GeneChip (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA). Hierarchical cluster analysis, principal component analysis, and support vector machine (SVM) analysis exploited genomic correlations within the data to classify CCS/MSP. RESULTS: Unsupervised analyses demonstrated a clear distinction between STS and melanoma and, furthermore, showed that CCS/MSP cluster with the melanomas as a distinct group. A supervised SVM learning approach further validated this finding and provided a user-independent approach to diagnosis. Genes of interest that discriminate CCS/MSP included those encoding melanocyte differentiation antigens, MITF, SOX10, ERBB3, and FGFR1. CONCLUSION: Gene expression profiles support the classification of CCS/MSP as a distinct genomic subtype of melanoma. Analysis of these gene profiles using the SVM may be an important diagnostic tool. Genomic analysis identified potential targets for the development of therapeutic strategies in the treatment of this disease.     

Structural basis for p50RhoGAP BCH domain–mediated regulation of Rho inactivation

Spatiotemporal regulation of signaling cascades is crucial for various biological pathways, under the control of a range of scaffolding proteins. The BNIP-2 and Cdc42GAP Homology (BCH) domain is a highly conserved module that targets small GTPases and their regulators. Proteins bearing BCH domains are key for driving cell elongation, retraction, membrane protrusion, and other aspects of active morphogenesis during cell migration, myoblast differentiation, and neuritogenesis. We previously showed that the BCH domain of p50RhoGAP (ARHGAP1) sequesters RhoA from inactivation by its adjacent GAP domain; however, the underlying molecular mechanism for RhoA inactivation by p50RhoGAP remains unknown. Here, we report the crystal structure of the BCH domain of p50RhoGAP Schizosaccharomyces pombe and model the human p50RhoGAP BCH domain to understand its regulatory function using in vitro and cell line studies. We show that the BCH domain adopts an intertwined dimeric structure with asymmetric monomers and harbors a unique RhoA-binding loop and a lipid-binding pocket that anchors prenylated RhoA. Interestingly, the β5-strand of the BCH domain is involved in an intermolecular β-sheet, which is crucial for inhibition of the adjacent GAP domain. A destabilizing mutation in the β5-strand triggers the release of the GAP domain from autoinhibition. This renders p50RhoGAP active, thereby leading to RhoA inactivation and increased self-association of p50RhoGAP molecules via their BCH domains. Our results offer key insight into the concerted spatiotemporal regulation of Rho activity by BCH domain–containing proteins.

Small GTPases are molecular switches that cycle between an active GTP-bound state and an inactive GDP-bound state and are primarily involved in cytoskeletal reorganization during cell motility, morphogenesis, and cytokinesis (1, 2). These small GTPases are tightly controlled by activators and inactivators, such as guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) and GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs), respectively (3, 4), which are multidomain proteins that are themselves regulated through their interactions with other proteins, lipids, secondary messengers, and/or by posttranslational modifications (5–7). Despite our understanding of the mechanisms of action of GTPases, GAPs, and GEFs, little is known about how they are further regulated by other cellular proteins in tightly controlled local environments.The BNIP-2 and Cdc42GAP Homology (BCH) domain has emerged as a highly conserved and versatile scaffold protein domain that targets small GTPases, their GEFs, and GAPs to carry out various cellular processes in a spatial, temporal, and kinetic manner (8–15). BCH domain–containing proteins are classified into a distinct functional subclass of the CRAL_TRIO/Sec14 superfamily, with ∼175 BCH domain–containing proteins (in which 14 of them are in human) present across a range of eukaryotic species (16). Some well-studied BCH domain–containing proteins include BNIP-2, BNIP-H (CAYTAXIN), BNIP-XL, BNIP-Sα, p50RhoGAP (ARHGAP1), and BPGAP1 (ARHGAP8), with evidence to show their involvement in cell elongation, retraction, membrane protrusion, and other aspects of active morphogenesis during cell migration, growth activation and suppression, myoblast differentiation, and neuritogenesis (17–21). Aside from interacting with small GTPases and their regulators, some of these proteins can also associate with other signaling proteins, such as fibroblast growth factor receptor tyrosine kinases, myogenic Cdo receptor, p38-MAP kinase, Mek2/MP1, and metabolic enzymes, such as glutaminase and ATP-citrate lyase (17–26). Despite the functional diversity and versatility of BCH domain–containing proteins, the structure of the BCH domain and its various modes of interaction remain unknown. The BCH domain resembles the Sec14 domain (from the CRAL-TRIO family) (16, 27, 28), a domain with lipid-binding characteristics, which may suggest that the BCH domain could have a similar binding strategy. However, to date, the binding and the role of lipids in BCH domain function remain inconclusive.Of the BCH domain–containing proteins, we have focused on the structure and function of p50RhoGAP. p50RhoGAP comprises an N-terminal BCH domain and a C-terminal GAP domain separated by a proline-rich region. We found that p50RhoGAP contains a noncanonical RhoA-binding motif in its BCH domain and is associated with GAP-mediated cell rounding (13). Further, we showed previously that deletion of the BCH domain dramatically enhanced the activity of the adjacent GAP domain (13); however, the full dynamics of this interaction is unclear. Previously, it has been reported that the BCH and other domains regulate GAP activity in an autoinhibited manner (18, 21, 29, 30) involving the interactions of both the BCH and GAP domains, albeit the mechanism remains to be investigated. It has also been shown that a lipid moiety on Rac1 (a Rho GTPase) is necessary for its inactivation by p50RhoGAP (29, 31), which may imply a role in lipid binding. An understanding of how the BCH domain coordinates with the GAP domain to affect the local activity of RhoA and other GTPases would offer a previously unknown insight into the multifaceted regulation of Rho GTPase inactivation.To understand the BCH domain–mediated regulation of p50RhoGAP and RhoA activities, we have determined the crystal structure of a homologous p50RhoGAP BCH domain from S. pombe for functional interrogation. We show that the BCH domain adopts an intertwined dimeric structure with asymmetric monomers and harbors a unique RhoA-interacting loop and a lipid-binding pocket. Our results show that the lipid-binding region of the BCH domain helps to anchor the prenylation tail of RhoA while the loop interacts directly with RhoA. Moreover, we show that a mutation in the β5-strand releases the autoinhibition of the GAP domain by the BCH domain. This renders the GAP domain active, leading to RhoA inactivation and the associated phenotypic effects in yeast and HeLa cells. The released BCH domain also contributes to enhanced p50RhoGAP–p50RhoGAP interaction. Our findings offer crucial insights into the regulation of Rho signaling by BCH domain–containing proteins.