Toxic epidermal necrolysis; 15 years'' experience in a Dutch burns centre

BACKGROUND: Toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) is a severe and potentially fatal drug reaction characterized by an extensive skin rash with blisters and exfoliation, frequently accompanied by mucositis. The wounds caused by TEN are similar to second-degree burns and severe cases may involve large areas of skin loss. OBJECTIVES: Analysis of our results in patients with TEN and evaluation of the variety of therapeutic interventions that has been studied and suggested in TEN. PATIENTS/METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 19 consecutive patients with TEN treated in our burns centre between 1989 and 2004. RESULTS: Immediate withdrawal of any potentially fatal drug, maximum supportive care, and a restricted and tailored antibiotic, medical and surgical treatment regimen confined mortality to 21%, whereas prognosis scores like APACHE II and SCORTEN predicted mortality of 22 and 30%, respectively. A positive contribution of selective digestive decontamination is suggested but has yet to be established. CONCLUSIONS: Because of a potentially fatal outcome, fast referral of a patient suspected of TEN to a specialized centre (mostly a burns unit or specialized dermatology centre) for expert wound management and tailored comprehensive care is strongly advised and contributes to survival.     

女性慢性下腹痛的干预性治疗

1背景 育龄妇女常见慢性下腹痛，可造成身体损害、情绪忧伤及导致巨大的健康服务费用。美国在这方面的花费超过8亿8千万美元（Mathias 1996）。英国全国数据库的一般性诊治资料显示，慢性下腹痛发病率及流行率与偏头痛、背部痛、哮喘发病率相似（Zondervan 1999）。     

Early detection of colorectal cancer: a profile of current practice.

This study examines the prevalence of colorectal cancer screening among individuals in the general community. The survey was undertaken as part of a large scale general population survey of health practices and attitudes. A sample of 1090 people aged 40 years and over with no previous history of colorectal cancer or other predisposing condition was interviewed. Only 56% of this group reported that they regularly checked their bowel movements, the toilet bowl, or the toilet paper for signs of rectal bleeding. Only 13% could recall a doctor ever advising them to check for rectal bleeding; and 21% could recall a doctor asking them if they had ever noticed blood in their bowel movements. More involved practitioner-based procedures, such as digital rectal examination, fecal occult blood testing, endoscopy, and barium enema, were reported by only a minority of participants. Analysis of screening rates in the 9.3% of people who reported a family history of colorectal cancer revealed that this higher risk group was no more likely to be screened than those at average risk.     

Detection of alcohol-related problems in general practice.

While primary care has considerable potential as a site for detecting and intervening for alcohol-related problems, few doctors currently identify these problems. The judgments of eight primary care physicians about alcohol-related problems in 371 of their patients were compared with the patients' responses to the Short Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test (SMAST) and the CAGE. The CAGE classified 11.4% of the patients as alcoholics and the SMAST identified 23.9% as probable alcoholics. However, the doctors identified only a small proportion (7.0%) of their patients as having any level of alcohol-related problem. The doctors did not identify 65.0% of CAGE-defined alcoholics and 82.3% of those patients classified by the SMAST as probable alcoholics. The discrepancy between primary care physician's judgments and the SMAST and CAGE may be attributable to the doctor's failure to identify patients with alcohol-related problems. An alternative explanation is that the SMAST and CAGE are inappropriate screening tools for use in Australian primary care. The findings are discussed in terms of the implications for training doctors and for the development of better measures of alcohol-related problems for use within a primary care context.