The OneFlorida Data Trust: a centralized,translational research data infrastructure of statewide scope

The OneFlorida Data Trust is a centralized research patient data repository created and managed by the OneFlorida Clinical Research Consortium (“OneFlorida”). It comprises structured electronic health record (EHR), administrative claims, tumor registry, death, and other data on 17.2 million individuals who received healthcare in Florida between January 2012 and the present. Ten healthcare systems in Miami, Orlando, Tampa, Jacksonville, Tallahassee, Gainesville, and rural areas of Florida contribute EHR data, covering the major metropolitan regions in Florida. Deduplication of patients is accomplished via privacy-preserving entity resolution (precision 0.97–0.99, recall 0.75), thereby linking patients’ EHR, claims, and death data. Another unique feature is the establishment of mother-baby relationships via Florida vital statistics data. Research usage has been significant, including major studies launched in the National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network (“PCORnet”), where OneFlorida is 1 of 9 clinical research networks. The Data Trust’s robust, centralized, statewide data are a valuable and relatively unique research resource.     

Asthma and mental disorders in primary care

This study examines relationships between asthma and likelihood of current mental disorders and suicidal ideation in an urban primary care population. A systematic waiting room sample of 998 adult patients was screened for mental disorders using the PRIME-MD PHQ. Asthma diagnoses were provided by primary care physicians. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to determine the odds of current major depression, panic attacks, generalized anxiety disorder, alcohol and drug use disorder, and suicidal ideation among patients with a diagnosis of asthma, as compared to those without asthma. After controlling for differences in sociodemographic characteristics and comorbid mental disorders, asthma was associated with increased likelihood of panic attack (OR=1.7 (1.1, 2.6)) and suicidal ideation (OR=1.9 (1.03, 3.4)). There was no statistically significant association between asthma and major depression, generalized anxiety disorder, alcohol, or drug use disorders after adjustment. Results suggest that physician-diagnosed asthma is associated with self-reported panic attacks and suicidal ideation in a systematic sample of primary care patients. Physicians who treat patients with asthma should remain vigilant for the presence of comorbid psychiatric problems and carefully evaluate whether there is a clinical need to treat each condition.     

Race/ethnicity, poverty status, and renal transplant outcomes

BACKGROUND: There are known racial disparities in renal graft survival. Data are lacking comparing associations of race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status with graft failure and functional status after transplantation. Our goal was to test if African-American and Hispanic race/ethnicity and poverty are associated with worse outcomes following renal transplantation. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study using a nationwide registry (United Network for Organ Sharing). We studied 4,471 adults who received renal transplants in 1990. Outcomes were graft failure and functional status over 10 years. RESULTS: Cumulative incidence of graft failure was higher among African-Americans and Hispanics than whites (77% vs. 64% vs. 60 %; P<0.001) and among transplant recipients living in the poorest areas (70% vs. 58% in the richest; P<0.001). African-American and Hispanic race/ethnicity were independently predictive of graft failure (RR 1.8, 95% CI 1.6-1.9; RR 1.3, 95% CI 1.2-1.6, respectively) in multivariate analyses but poverty status was not (RR 1.0, 95% CI 0.9-1.1). Days with impaired functional status were higher for African-Americans compared to whites (RR 1.6, 95% CI 1.3-1.9) but not independent of poverty. Poverty was independently associated with impaired functional status (RR 1.3, 95% CI 1.0-1.6). CONCLUSIONS: African-Americans and Hispanics had higher rates of graft failure compared to whites after adjustment for poverty and other covariates whereas poverty, but not race/ethnicity, was related to functional status following renal transplantation. National datasets should include individual-level measures of socioeconomic status in order to improve evaluation of social and environmental causes of disparities in renal transplant outcomes.     

Changes in Postmenopausal Hormone Replacement Therapy Use Among Women With High Cardiovascular Risk

After randomized trials failed to support the use of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) for preventing cardiovascular disease (CVD), HRT use for postmenopausal women declined. Our analysis of 1999–2000 and 2003–2004 National Health and Nutrition Surveys (NHANES) shows that HRT use decreased 19% (from 27.6 to 8.4%; P < .001) among women with CVD versus 3% (from 19.8 to 16.8%; P = .68) among low-risk women, suggesting that most of the drop in HRT use may be among women prescribed HRT as an unproven treatment to prevent CVD.In the early 1990s, on the basis of findings from observational studies, hormone replacement therapy (HRT) was widely promoted to decrease cardiovascular disease (CVD) in postmenopausal women.^1,2 Subsequently, large randomized trials found that HRT did not prevent CVD and that, instead, HRT was associated with an increased risk for stroke and combined estrogen-progestin HRT was associated with a possible increased risk for heart disease.^3–6 Following broad dissemination of these results,^7,8 HRT use declined markedly.^1,9 We report on HRT use in the years 1999–2000 and 2003–2004 by CVD risk, socioeconomic status, and race/ethnicity. We hypothesized that reductions in HRT would be greatest among women with CVD or CVD risk factors.     

Twelve-year trends in health insurance coverage among Latinos, by subgroup and immigration status

We examine twelve-year trends in the Latino uninsured population by ethnic subgroup and immigration status. From 1993 to 1999, most Latino subgroups, particularly Puerto Ricans, had large decreases in Medicaid coverage. For some subgroups these were offset by increases in employer coverage, but not for Mexicans, resulting in a four-percentage-point increase in their uninsured population. During 2000-2004, Medicaid/SCHIP expansions benefited most subgroups and mitigated smaller losses in employer coverage. However, during 1993-2004, the percentage of noncitizen Latinos lacking coverage increased by several percentage points. This was attributable to Medicaid losses during 1993-1999 and losses in employer coverage during 2000-2004.     

Training for interdisciplinary health research: defining the required competencies

Although interdisciplinary research is becoming the dominant model for understanding complex health issues, little is known about the competencies required for successful interdisciplinary collaboration. Published research has discussed attitudes about interdisciplinary work and organizational resources but not the needed competencies. This report describes the method and results of the competency specification process for health research. Based on an established definition of interdisciplinary research, a preliminary set of competencies was developed from expert opinion of key informants and a review of the interdisciplinary research literature. A Delphi panel of interdisciplinary researchers then reached consensus on 17 competencies necessary for interdisciplinary research.     

Sex and Racial/Ethnic Differences in Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factor Treatment and Control Among Individuals With Diabetes in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA)

OBJECTIVE

To examine sex and racial/ethnic differences in cardiovascular risk factor treatment and control among individuals with diabetes in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This study was an observational study examining mean levels of cardiovascular risk factors and proportion of subjects achieving treatment goals.

RESULTS

The sample included 926 individuals with diabetes. Compared with men, women were 9% less likely to achieve LDL cholesterol <130 mg/dl (adjusted prevalence ratio 0.91 [0.83–0.99]) and systolic blood pressure (SBP) <130 mmHg (adjusted prevalence ratio 0.91 [0.85–0.98]). These differences diminished over time. A lower percentage of women used aspirin (23 vs. 33%; P < 0.001). African American and Hispanic women had higher mean levels of SBP and lower prevalence of aspirin use than non-Hispanic white women.

CONCLUSIONS

Women with diabetes had unfavorable cardiovascular risk factor profiles compared with men. African American and Hispanic women had less favorable profiles than non-Hispanic white women.Population-based health survey data suggest that sex and racial/ethnic disparities are present in diabetes process of care measures and cardiovascular risk factor control (1–9). Available data also indicate that sex-specific race/ethnicity differences are present in cardiovascular risk factor control, but these data are limited to Medicare and Veterans'' Hospital patient populations (5,10–13). We therefore performed analyses of participants with diabetes in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) to examine sex and sex-specific racial/ethnic differences in cardiovascular risk factor treatment and control.     

Community Health Worker Interventions to Improve Glycemic Control in People with Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVES

We set out to review the efficacy of Community Health Worker (CHW) interventions to improve glycemia in people with diabetes.

METHODS

Data sources included the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Medline, clinicaltrials.gov, Google Scholar, and reference lists of previous publications. We reviewed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that assessed the efficacy of CHW interventions, as compared to usual care, to lower hemoglobin A1c (A1c). Two investigators independently reviewed the RCTs and assessed their quality. Only RCTs with a follow-up of at least 12 months were meta-analyzed. A random effects model was used to estimate, from unadjusted within-group mean reductions, the standardized mean difference (SMD) in A1c achieved by the CHW intervention, beyond usual care.

RESULTS

Thirteen RCTs were included in the narrative review, and nine of them, which had at least 12 months of follow-up, were included in the meta-analysis. Publication bias could not be ruled-out due to the small number of trials. Outcome heterogeneity was moderate (I²= 37 %). The SMD in A1c (95 % confidence interval) was 0.21 (0.11-0.32). Meta-regression showed an association between higher baseline A1c and a larger effect size.

CONCLUSIONS

CHW interventions showed a modest reduction in A1c compared to usual care. A1c reduction was larger in studies with higher mean baseline A1c. Caution is warranted, given the small number of studies.