理筋正骨手法联合消瘀接骨散治疗膝骨性关节炎的临床观察

目的:观察理筋正骨手法联合消瘀接骨散治疗膝骨性关节炎的临床疗效.方法:将60例膝骨性关节炎的患者随机分为治疗组和对照组,每组30例.治疗组采用理筋正骨手法结合消瘀接骨散治疗,对照组采用中频电结合消瘀接骨散治疗.治疗前后运用视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale,VAS)量表、西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨...     

理筋正骨手法联合运动疗法治疗上交叉综合征疗效观察

目的:评价中医理筋正骨手法联合运动疗法治疗上交叉综合征特别是头前倾的治疗效果。方法:招募患有上交叉综合征(UCS)的大学生志愿者30名,接受理筋正骨手法结合运动疗法治疗,30min/次,1次/2d,7次为一个疗程,共治疗2个疗程。于治疗前后分别采用VAS量表、头前倾角度(FHA)进行检测。结果:治疗后FHA角度、VAS评分较治疗前显著改善,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:理筋正骨手法联合运动疗法治疗上交叉综合征可以缓解疼痛,减小头前倾角度,矫正不良体态,从而达到治疗目的。     

运动疗法治疗膝骨关节炎临床研究进展

从肌力训练、有氧运动训练、神经肌肉运动训练、其他疗法等四方面介绍了运动疗法治疗膝骨关节炎的研究概况,并进行了个性化的运动处方制定,总结当前临床中存在的问题并提出展望,为膝骨关节炎的运动治疗提供参考.     

理筋正骨手法结合运动疗法治疗慢性非特异性下背痛临床观察

目的:评价理筋正骨手法结合运动疗法治疗慢性非特异性下背痛(CNLBP)的临床疗效.方法:将65例CNLBP患者根据随机数字表法分为两组,治疗组33例接受理筋正骨手法联合运动疗法治疗;对照组32例接受中频电疗法结合运动疗法治疗.治疗前后使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)、腰部动静态肌耐力、表面肌电中位频率(MF)和Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)对患者腰部功能进行评估.治疗后进行疗效评价.结果:治疗过程中,两组各脱落2例.治疗组总有效率为90.3%,对照组为66.7%,两组总有效率差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).治疗后,两组VAS评分、腰部动静态肌耐力、表面肌电MF和ODI评分与本组治疗前均有统计学差异(均P<0.05);治疗组各项指标与对照组均有统计学差异(均P<0.05).结论:理筋正骨手法结合运动疗法可有效缓解CNLBP患者的疼痛,提高腰部肌肉耐力,改善患者的生活质量,其疗效优于中频电疗法结合运动疗法.     

理筋正骨手法联合运动疗法治疗膝骨关节炎30例临床观察

目的观察理筋正骨手法联合运动疗法治疗膝骨关节炎的临床疗效。方法将60例膝骨关节炎患者按照随机数字表法分为治疗组和对照组,各30例。对照组给予常规推拿疗法,治疗组给予理筋正骨手法联合运动疗法,2组均1次/d,7 d为1个疗程,共治疗3个疗程。比较2组治疗前后视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分、压痛值、临床症状评分及2组股四头肌积分肌电值(i EMG)。结果治疗后2组VAS评分明显降低,压痛值明显升高,与同组治疗前比较差异均有统计学意义(P0.05),且治疗组改善作用明显优于对照组,2组治疗后比较差异均有统计学意义(P0.05)。治疗后2组除肿胀程度外其他各项临床症状评分均明显升高,与同组治疗前比较差异有统计学意义(P0.05),且治疗组升高幅度显著大于对照组,2组治疗后比较差异均有统计学意义(P0.05)。治疗组20 s被动牵伸与20 s主动运动i EMG均明显高于对照组,2组比较差异均有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论理筋正骨手法联合运动疗法可缓解膝骨关节炎患者疼痛,改善膝关节活动功能,从而提高患者的生活质量。     

Clinical observation of sinew-regulating and bone-setting manipulation combined with functional exercise to treat rotator cuff injury

Objective

To explore the clinical efficacy of sinew-regulating and bone-setting manipulation combined with functional exercise to treat mild to moderate rotator cuff injury (RCI).

Methods

Forty patients with mild to moderate RCI were randomly divided into a treatment group and a control group, with 20 cases in each group. The treatment group was given sinew-regulating and bone-setting manipulation combined with functional exercise, and the control group was given the same manipulation as the treatment group. The therapeutic effect on the functional improvement was assessed after treatment according to pain threshold, shoulder range of motion (ROM) including flexion, abduction, internal rotation and external rotation, and the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder rating score.

Results

Compared with the same group before treatment, the pain threshold, shoulder flexion, abduction, internal and external rotations increased after the treatment in the two groups (all P<0.05). The UCLA shoulder rating score increased (both P<0.05). The improvement in the treatment group is significantly better than that in the control group with a statistical significance (P<0.05). The total effective rate was 95.0% in the treatment group, was higher than 65.0% in the control group (P<0.05).

Conclusion

The sinew-regulating and bone-setting manipulation combined with functional exercise relieve the pain of patients with mild to moderate RCI, increase the motion of shoulder joints, and improve the quality of life of patients. The curative effect is better than the treatment of simple sinew-regulating and bone-setting manipulation.