SW-620 cells treated with topoisomerase I inhibitor SN-38: gene expression profiling

Background  

The goal of this study was to evaluate changes in gene expression in SW-620 cells in response to SN-38 in order to further elucidate the mechanisms by which SN-38 causes apoptosis and cell cycle arrest.     

The use of preventive measures among healthy women who carry a <Emphasis Type="BoldItalic">BRCA1</Emphasis> or <Emphasis Type="BoldItalic">BRCA2</Emphasis> mutation

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess women’s knowledge about tamoxifen, to examine the frequency of tamoxifen usage and other preventive measures in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers, and to document women’s concerns about taking tamoxifen for chemoprevention.Methods: One hundred and twenty five women with known BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation and with no prior diagnosis of breast or ovarian cancer were identified through the records of two large cancer genetics clinics. These women had been counseled about their cancer risk and various preventive options were discussed. At a time from two to 110 months following disclosure session, a questionnaire was sent by mail. Women were asked about their current and past use of tamoxifen, their knowledge of risks and benefits, their desire for additional information, and their experience with other preventive measures.Results: Eighty-one of 125 eligible women returned the questionnaire (64.8%). Ten women (12.3%) had used tamoxifen and eight women had used raloxifene (9.9%). Twenty-two women (27.2%) had undergone prophylactic mastectomy and 54 women (66.7%) had had an oophorectomy. Twelve women (14.8%) did not recall discussing tamoxifen. Thirty-five women (58.3%) said that their doctors had not provided them with sufficient information about tamoxifen to consider its use. Fear of side-effects was the most common reason for not taking tamoxifen.Conclusion: Although tamoxifen appears to be effective in preventing breast cancer in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation, few women now take the drug compared to those who choose other preventive measures including surgery. Health care providers should provide accurate information about the risks and benefits of tamoxifen to allow women to make informed decisions.     

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Head and Neck Melanomas

Background: Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy for head and neck (H&&N) melanomas may be more technically challenging compared with other locations because of complex lymphatic drainage patterns. This analysis was performed to compare the results of SLN biopsy for H&&N, truncal, and extremity melanomas.Methods: The Sunbelt Melanoma Trial includes patients aged 18 to 70 with melanomas 1.0 mm thick. Statistical comparison was performed by ² or analysis of variance test.Results: A total of 2610 patients were evaluated with a median follow-up of 18 months. The mean number of SLN per nodal basin was 2.8, 2.7, and 2.1 for H&&N, truncal, and extremity melanomas, respectively. Median Clark level, Breslow thickness, and percentage of ulceration were similar between the groups. Peri-parotid SLN was identified in 25% of cases; there were no facial nerve injuries. SLN biopsy for H&&N melanoma had higher false-negative rates at 1.5% (vs. 0.5% for trunk or extremity) but less histologically positive SLN at 15% (vs. 23.4%, and 19.5%; P &< .001) compared with truncal and extremity melanoma. Blue dye was visualized less frequently in SLN of H&&N melanoma patients compared with those with trunk or extremity melanomas.Conclusions: Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy and meticulous intraoperative search for blue/radioactive nodes may improve results in H&&N melanomas.Presented at the Society of Surgical Oncology Annual Meeting, Denver, CO, March 14–17, 2002.