ASO Visual Abstract: Optimal Treatment of cT2N0 Esophageal Carcinoma—Is Upfront Surgery Really the Way?

Annals of Surgical Oncology -     

Arteroportal fistulas between the accessory right hepatic, gastroduodenal and superior mesenteric arteries and portal vein: a difficult technical problem to overcome in liver transplantation

BACKGROUND: Fistulous communications between the accessory right hepatic (ARHA), gastroduodenal (GD), and superior mesenteric (SMA) arteries and the portal vein (PV) may represent a contraindication for liver transplantation (LT). MATERIAL: A patient with HCV-related liver cirrhosis and progressive liver decompensation underwent preoperative LT work-up. Doppler ultrasound (DU), Angiography and MRI revealed arteroportal fistulas (APF) and diversion of mesenteric-splenoportal flow through spontaneous splenorenal shunts (SSRS) in the systemic circulation. The patient was transplanted and the ARHA and GDA were distally sectioned; the HA was anastomosed to the donor HA; the superior mesenteric vein (SMV) was detached from the splenopancreatic venous bed by sectioning and ligating the Henle trunk, by ligating an posterior-inferior pancreatic vein and, finally, by positioning an iliac vein interposition graft between the SMV and the donor PV. The postanastomotic SMV trunk and recipient PV were ligated below and above the pancreatic head, respectively. RESULTS: Reperfusion and late liver function were good. DU and MRI studies showed an effective portal flow and the maintenance of a normal splenopancreatic vein outflow through the SSRS. DISCUSSION: APF represent a serious clinical problem, particularly in patients who need LT. The persistence of arterial flow into the PV is dangerous for the long-term liver function. A particular surgical strategy, strictly tailored to the hemodynamic conditions, has to be planned. CONCLUSIONS: Extrahepatic multiple APF would no longer to represent a contraindication to LT, although this claim needs to be confirmed in the light of further experience and a longer-term follow-up.     

Validation of the BCLC Prognostic System in Surgical Hepatocellular Cancer Patients

Background/Aim

Prognosis assessment in surgical patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains controversial. The most widely used HCC prognostic tool is the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) classification, but its prognostic ability in surgical patients has not been yet validated. The aim of this study was to investigate the value of known prognostic systems in 400 Italian HCC patients treated with radical surgical therapies.

Methods

We analyzed a prospective database collection (400 surgical, 315 nonsurgical patients) observed at a single institution from 2000 and 2007. By using survival times as the only outcome measure (Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression), the performance of the BCLC classification was compared with that of Okuda, Cancer of the Liver Italian Program, United Network for Organ sharing TNM, and Japan Integrated Staging Score staging systems.

Results

Two hundred twenty-five patients underwent laparotomy resection; 55, laparoscopic procedures (ablation and/or resection); and 120, liver transplantations. In the surgical group, BCLC proved the best HCC prognostic system. Three-year survival rates of patients in BCLC Stages A, B, and C were 81%, 56%, and 44% respectively, (P < .01); whereas all other tested staging systems did not show significant stratification ability. When all 715 HCC patients were considered, surgery proved to be a significant survival predictor in each BCLC stage (A, B, and C).

Conclusions

BCLC staging showed the best interpretation of the survival distribution in a surgical HCC population. The BCLC treatment algorithm should consider the role of surgery also for intermediate-advanced stages of liver disease.     

Hepatitis C virus-related cirrhosis as a significant mortality factor in intention-to-treat analysis in liver transplantation

INTRODUCTION: Liver transplantation represents the gold standard for the treatment of chronic liver disease. The whole transplantation process was assessed using an intention-to-treat analysis and considering patients from the time of their inclusion on the list and throughout lengthy follow-up. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 1, 1999 to June 1, 2004, 373 adults joined the waiting list for liver transplantation at our institution. The main variables analyzed were: age, gender, etiology, Model for End-stage Liver Disease score, Child-Pugh class, United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) status. Global survival was evaluated using intention-to-treat analysis from the time of patient inclusion in the list to the end of their late follow-up. RESULTS: The median waiting time was 20 months (range 0.1 to 70.2). By univariate analysis, the variables significantly influencing survival when patients joined the waiting list were: encephalopathy; ascites, poor nutritional status, Child-Pugh class C, UNOS 2, hepatitis C virus (HCV) and bilirubin > 2 mg/dL. By multivariate analysis, only HCV-related cirrhosis emerged as having an independent prognostic value. By intention-to-treat analysis, the 5-year survival rate was 67% and 79% for HCV-positive and HCV-negative patients, respectively (P = .0003). CONCLUSIONS: HCV-related cirrhosis is an independent prognostic factor for survival according to an intention-to-treat analysis. Different inclusion criteria or treatments while on the waiting list and after transplantation need to be considered in the future for HCV-positive patients.     

Pediatric liver transplantation: the University of Padua experience

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to analyze experience on pediatric liver transplantation (LT) between June 1993 and September 2006, including split liver transplantation (SLT), living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), and auxiliary partial orthotopic liver transplantation (APOLT). Furthermore, hepatocyte transplantation (HT) had a role in one patient with metabolic disease. METHODS: From November 1990 to September 2006, 657 LTs were performed including 63 pediatric LTs (9.6%) in 57 patients (32 boys and 25 girls). Six were retransplantations (9.5%). Thirty-two patients (57%) were younger than 5 years. The types of graft included the following: 26 whole organs (41%), 32 in situ split organs (51%), 4 reduced-size organs (6%), and 1 graft from a living donor (2%). Two patients received an APOLT, 4 patients received a combined kidney-liver transplantation (CKLT), and 1 patient received HT. Of the 63 pediatric LTs, 16 were behaved to be highly urgent (25%). RESULTS: Overall 1-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year patient survival rates were 82%, 82%, 78%, and 78%, respectively. Overall 1-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year graft survival rates were 76%, 76%, 72%, and 72%, respectively. In patients younger than 1 year, the 5-year survival rate was 100%. Perioperative mortality was 8.8%. Vascular complications occurred in 4 patients (6.3%). Six children required retransplantation due to primary nonfunction (PNF) in 4 cases (7%) and vascular thrombosis in 2 cases (3.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Cholestatic liver disease and age younger than 1 year were the best prognostic factors for excellent survival.     

Preoperative selective portal vein embolization (PSPVE) before major hepatic resection. Effectiveness of Doppler estimation of hepatic blood flow to predict the hypertrophy rate of non-embolized liver segments

Hepatocellular carcinoma may be unresectable for volumetric reasons. The future remaining liver after hepatectomy might be too small to ensure survival. Preoperative selective portal vein embolization of the tumorous lobe can induce hypertrophy of the future remaining liver and enable safer surgery. A 76-year-old patient with hepatocellular carcinoma needed right lobectomy however, the future remaining liver was judged insufficient to ensure an uneventful postoperative course. The left lobe to whole liver volumetric ratio was to small (29.7%) and a preoperative selective portal vein embolization of the right portal branch via a percutaneous, transhepatic, contralateral approach was performed without side effects. A Doppler estimation of left branch portal blood flow and velocity was carried out before and after preoperative selective portal vein embolization. After 21 days the left lobe volume increased by about 44.2% with a safe left lobe/whole liver ratio of 40.8%. The portal blood flow and portal blood flow velocity showed an increase of 253% and 122%, respectively. A right lobectomy was performed without complications. Three months later, computed tomography scan showed no hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence. Preoperative selective portal vein embolization is a safe technique which can enable major hepatectomy to be performed in situations otherwise judged unresectable for a life-threatening volumetric insufficiency. The portal blood flow and portal blood flow velocity evaluations can easily predict the hypertrophy rate of non-embolized liver segments.     

Prognostic impact of model for end-stage liver disease score in patients undergoing liver transplantation with suboptimal livers

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The aim of this retrospective study is to analyze the prognostic impact of Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score in patients undergoing liver transplantation (OLT) with suboptimal livers. METHODS: Between January 2002 and January 2006, 160 adult patients with liver cirrhosis received a whole liver for primary OLT at our institution including 81 with a suboptimal liver (SOL group) versus 79 with an optimal liver (group OL). The definition of suboptimal liver was: one major criterion (age >60 years, steatosis >20%) or at least two minor criteria: sodium >155 mEq/L, Intensive Care Unit stay >7 days, dopamine >10 microg/kg/min, abnormal liver tests, and relevant hemodynamic instability. RESULTS: Baseline recipients characteristics were comparable in the two study groups. The SOL group had a significantly greater number of early graft deaths (<30 days) than the OL group, while the 3-year Kaplan-Meier patient survivals were similar. Using logistic regression, MELD score was significantly related to patient death only in the SOL group (P = .01), and the receiver operator characteristics curve method identified 17 as the best MELD cutoff with the 3-year survival of 93% versus 85% for MELD < or =7 versus >17, respectively (P > 05). In comparison, it was 94% and 72% in the SOL group (P < .05). Similarly, MELD >17 was significantly associated with early graft death rates only in the SOL group. CONCLUSION: This study advised surgeons to not use suboptimal livers for patients with advanced MELD scores, thus supporting a donor-recipient matching policy.     

Long-term results of liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: an update of the University of Padova experience

BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) competes with benign liver disease as indication for liver transplantation (OLT). The aim of this study was to determine long-term results of OLT for HCC. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the prognostic role of HCC diagnosis at pathological exam in adult OLT. In the HCC group, we evaluated the prognostic role of the time of diagnosis (incidental versus nonincidental) and of pathological tumor TNM staging. The primary endpoint was 1-, 3-, and 10-year patient survivals. RESULTS: From 1991 to 2006, among 550 adults who underwent first OLT, HCC was found in 120 patients at pathological exam. In 26 cases (22%), the diagnosis of HCC was incidental. There were 59 cases (49%) of pathological T1 to T2 tumor (one nodule < 5 cm, or two to three nodules < 3 cm, without metastases and/or vascular invasion), and 61 cases (51%) of pathologic T3-T4a tumor. HCC diagnosis did not show a significant prognostic impact by Cox survival analysis. After a median follow-up of 31 months, 1-, 5-, and 10-year survivals were 91%, 81%, and 73% in the HCC group, and 84%, 76%, and 67% in the non-HCC group. Time of HCC diagnosis (incidental versus nonincidental) and pathological TNM staging (T1 to T2 vs T3 to T4a) did not result significant survival predictors upon Cox analysis. CONCLUSION: In our experience, the long-term results of OLT for HCC overlapped those of OLT for benign disease, although 51% of tumors were T3 to T4a at pathological exam.     

Mucosal Perforation During Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy Has No Influence on Final Treatment Outcome

Background

The aims of the study were (a) to examine the final outcome in patients experiencing accidental mucosal perforation during laparoscopic Heller myotomy with Dor fundoplication (LHD) and (b) to evaluate whether perforation episodes might influence the way in which surgeons subsequently approached the LHD procedure.

Methods

We studied all consecutive patients that underwent LHD between 1992 and 2015. Patients were divided into two main groups: those who experienced an intraoperative mucosal perforation (group P) and those whose LHD was uneventful (group NP). Two additional groups were compared: group A, which consisted of patients operated by a given surgeon immediately before a perforation episode occurred, and group B, which included those operated immediately afterwards.

Results

Eight hundred seventy-five patients underwent LHD; a mucosal perforation was detected in 25 patients (2.9 %), which was found unrelated to patients’ symptom’s score and age, radiological stage, manometric pattern, or the surgeon’s experience. The median postoperative symptom score was similar for the two groups as the failure rate: 92 failures in group NP (10.8 %) and 4 in group P (16 %) (p?=?0.34); moreover, symptoms recurred in 2 patients of group A (10 %) and 3 patients of group B (15 %) (p?=?0.9).

Conclusions

Accidental perforation during LHD is infrequent and impossible to predict on the grounds of preoperative therapy or the surgeon’s personal experience. Despite a longer surgical procedure and hospital stay, the outcome of LHD is much the same as for patients undergoing uneventful myotomy. A recent mucosal perforation does not influence the surgeon’s subsequent performance.