Seguimiento a largo plazo del paciente trasplantado pulmonar

Since the outcomes of lung transplants are still poorer than those obtained with others, such as heart, kidney or liver transplants, the challenge for medicine remains focused on prolonging functional graft survival. The procedure triggers significant post-surgical physiopathological changes in the lung parenchyma, the rib cage, the airways and pulmonary circulation. The patient is exposed to risks that must be identified and controlled, such as complications fully or partially attributable to immunosuppressive treatment, including cardiovascular disease, tumors and infections and, of course, chronic graft dysfunction.     

Recommendations on the use of everolimus in lung transplantation

The antiproliferative effect of everolimus provides a therapeutic option in the immunosuppression therapy of lung transplantation, by reducing both the risk of acute rejection and the process of progressive fibrosis that determines chronic graft rejection. However, few data on the use of everolimus in lung transplantation have been published to date, and the specific indications of the drug, along with the most adequate time for its introduction or dosing, have not been defined yet.The aim of this article is to propose recommendations for the use of everolimus in lung transplant recipients, including indications, dosing schedules and the use of concomitant immunosuppression. This consensus document has been developed by experts of all the Spanish lung transplant groups from the review of the existing literature and the clinical experience.     

The impact of the prevention strategies on the indirect effects of CMV infection in solid organ transplant recipients

Transplant recipients receiving immunosuppressive therapy are at increased risk of active cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and disease. Without appropriate prophylaxis, as many as 80% of solid organ transplant recipients may experience CMV infection. In addition to the direct effects of CMV, infection may be associated with a range of indirect effects, including an increase in risk of other infections, as well as a higher incidence of rejection, graft loss and death. The indirect effects of CMV infection can vary depending on the transplanted organ. For example, CMV-infected kidney transplant recipients may be at increased risk of cardiovascular disease and diabetes, while CMV infection in liver transplant recipients may potentiate hepatitis C infection and increase the risk of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease. Indirect effects result from a number of pathological processes, including immune modulation and immunosuppression, generation of cytotoxic, pro-inflammatory responses, and smooth muscle proliferation. Prophylactic treatment with antiviral medication can reduce the risk of CMV disease, thereby improving graft survival and overall outcomes, particularly in kidney and heart transplant recipients. Antiviral prophylaxis should be considered for all patients at risk of CMV infection after solid organ transplantation. In this paper we review the main indirect effects of CMV infection in solid organ transplant recipients, and the impact of CMV prophylaxis on these effects.     

Is gammaglobulin anti-CMV warranted in lung transplantation?

The usefulness of anti-CMV hyperimmune gammaglobulin (IgG-CMV, Cytotec) in lung transplant patients (LTx) is controversial. The objective of this study was to analyze the effectiveness of IgG-CMV in our LTx receptors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective study of LTx recipients treated with IgG-CMV as prophylaxis or as treatment for invasive disease. We used IgG-CMV associated with IV ganciclovir (GCV) as treatment for invasive disease. High-risk patients (CMV-negative recipients from CMV-positive donors; CMV-/+) were also with IgG-CMV prophylaxis during the first year. Other prophylactic uses of IgG-CMV were as an alternative to GCV in patients with related GCV toxicity, and as preemptive therapy in cases of persistent positive viral load (antigenemia > or = 1 cell and/or a PCR > or = 400) although oral GCV administration. RESULTS: Between January 2000 and August 2003, 14 of the 74 lung transplant recipients (19%) received IgG-CMV as treatment for invasive disease (4 cases: 2 gastritis, 1 esophagitis, 1 hepatitis) and/or as prophylaxis (14 cases). All patients treated for invasive disease evolved favorably. No therapeutic failure were observed in CMV-/+ patients during treatment. Three of the six patients treated with IgG-CMV developed positive antigenemia despite treatment. The four patients treated for persistent antigenemia while receiving oral GCV achieved neutralization during the first month of treatment. CONCLUSION: IgG-CMV associated with Gancyclovir is effective as treatment for invasive disease and as pre-emptive therapy in patients with persistent positive viral load. In CMV-/+ recipients, IgG-CMV prevents pneumonitis and delays the development of invasive disease after the first year.     

New concepts and best practices for management of pre- and post-transplantation cancer

Solid-organ transplant recipients are at increased risk of developing cancer compared with the general population. Tumours can arise de novo, as a recurrence of a preexisting malignancy, or from the donated organ. The ATOS (Aula sobre Trasplantes de Órganos Sólidos; the Solid-Organ Transplantation Working Group) group, integrated by Spanish transplant experts, meets annually to discuss current advances in the field. In 2011, the 11th edition covered a range of new topics on cancer and transplantation. In this review we have highlighted the new concepts and best practices for managing cancer in the pre-transplant and post-transplant settings that were presented at the ATOS meeting. Immunosuppression plays a major role in oncogenesis in the transplant recipient, both through impaired immunosurveillance and through direct oncogenic activity. It is possible to transplant organs obtained from donors with a history of cancer as long as an effective minimization of malignancy transmission strategy is followed. Tumour-specific wait-periods have been proposed for the increased number of transplantation candidates with a history of malignancy; however, the patient's individual risk of death from organ failure must be taken into consideration. It is important to actively prevent tumour recurrence, especially the recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma in liver transplant recipients. To effectively manage post-transplant malignancies, it is essential to proactively monitor patients, with long-term intensive screening programs showing a reduced incidence of cancer post-transplantation. Proposed management strategies for post-transplantation malignancies include viral monitoring and prophylaxis to decrease infection-related cancer, immunosuppression modulation with lower doses of calcineurin inhibitors, and addition of or conversion to inhibitors of the mammalian target of rapamycin.