The potential of ecological theory for building an integrated framework to develop the public health contribution of health visiting

In line with recent UK and Scottish policy imperatives, there is increasing pressure for the health visiting service to assume an enhanced role in improving public health. Although health visiting has so far maintained its unique position as a primarily preventive service within the UK health service, its distinctive contribution now appears under threat. The continuing absence of a comprehensive and integrated conceptual basis for practice has a negative impact on the profession’s ability to respond to current challenges. Establishing an integrative framework to conceptualise health visiting practice would enable more sensitive, focused and appropriate research, education and evaluation in relation to practice. Work in this area could thus usefully contribute to the future development of the service at a difficult time. Our paper aims to make such a contribution. In support of our conceptual aims, we draw on a study of health visiting practice undertaken within a large conurbation in central Scotland. The study used a mixed method, collaborative approach involving 12 audio‐recorded and observed health visitor–client interactions, semi‐structured interviews with the 12 HVs and 12 clients, examination of related documentation and workshops with the HV participants. We critically consider prevalent models of health visiting practice and describe the more integrative conceptual approach provided by Bronfenbrenner’s ecological, ‘person‐in‐context’ framework. The paper subsequently explores relationships between this framework and understandings of need demonstrated by health visitors who participated in our study. Current policy emphasises the need to focus on public health and social inclusion in order to improve health. However, if this policy is to be translated into practice, we must develop a more adequate understanding of how practitioners work effectively with families and individuals in a sensitive and context‐specific manner. Bronfenbrenner’s framework appears to offer a promising means of building on the current strengths of the health visiting service to further develop a ‘person‐in‐context’ approach to health improvement that is mindful of and responsive to multiple, inter‐related influences on health. We therefore recommend further research to directly test the utility of this framework.     

The impact of the appearance of the anaesthetist on the patient''s perception of the pre-operative visit

The clinician's appearance is often considered a symbol which identifies and defines specific characteristics of the individual. Opinion of both lay and medical personnel on appropriate clothing inclines towards formal dress. Our aim was to assess the effect of the anaesthetist's appearance during a ward visit on the patient's evaluation of either the visit or the anesthetist himself. In our sample of 66 patients we found no evidence that the style of dress (formal: suit and tie, informal: jeans and open-necked shirt) affected that evaluation. However, when 138 patients were asked to rate the desirability of items of clothing for a male hospital doctor they expressed a preference for traditional clothing; a suit was rated as desirable and jeans as one of the four most undesirable items. We conclude that despite the conservatism of expressed opinions, the clothing worn by the anaesthetist is irrelevant to the patient's satisfaction with the visit.     

Maintaining dignity for residents of care homes: A qualitative study of the views of care home staff,community nurses,residents and their families

This study uses the Framework approach to qualitative analysis to explore and compare the views of residents in care homes for older people, their families and care providers on maintaining dignity. We interviewed 33 care home managers, 29 care assistants, 18 care home nurses, 10 community nurses, 16 residents and 15 members of residents' families. The most prevalent themes were: “independence,” and “privacy”; followed by “comfort and care,” “individuality,” “respect,” “communication,” “physical appearance” and “being seen as human.” Residents and their families sometimes described incidents where a resident's dignity had been compromised. How to help residents maintain dignity and focusing on fostering dignity, can be a starting point for improving the quality of care and quality of life of residents. It is, however, important to remove the gap between the rhetoric of dignity conserving care and the reality experienced by residents in these and other care settings.