The prevalence of dyslipoproteinemia in Thai patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

Fasting blood samples taken from 93 pairs of outpatient systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) women and matched controls were assessed for total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), high-density lipoprotein (HDL)- and low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol. The demographic data, clinical manifestations, Mexican-SLE Disease Activity Index (MEX-SLEDAI), Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology (SLICC/ACR) damage index and medication prescribed in the SLE patients were reviewed. A significant elevation of TG levels was observed in the SLE patients compared to controls (mean+/-SD 113.3+/-59.5 versus 77.7+/-45.7 mg/dL, P < 0.001). The HDL-c level was also significantly lower in SLE patients than controls (mean+/-SD 49.7+/-12.7 versus 65.0+/-14.8 mg/dL, P < 0.001). The percentage of samples with low HDL-c (<35 mg/dL) was higher in the SLE group (9.7%) than controls (0%; P = 0.002). The LDL-c and TC levels were comparable in both groups. The use of antimalarial drugs was negatively associated with TC (OR 0.22, 95%CI 0.08-0.61) and LDL-c levels (OR 0.27, 95%CI 0.09-0.80). The increased prevalence of dyslipoproteinemia in SLE patients in this report has confirmed the results of previous studies and emphasized the importance of controlling this modifiable cardiovascular risk factor by the combination of lifestyle modification and medical treatments.     

Development of an airborne lead analysis kit and its application

We developed a method to analyze airborne lead concentrations in the field. It was a modification of the colorimetric method using the reaction between 4(2-pyridylazo)-resorcinol (PAR) and lead with cyanex302 in an acid medium to reduce interfering metals. The lead concentration was detected with a photometer made in Thailand. The developed method uses an impinger containing 1% nitric acid solution as an absorbing agent to collect airborne lead at a flow rate of less than or equal to one liter/minute. Cyanex302 solution in toluene was used to extract metals from the samples and 0.1M nitric acid was used to extract just lead. The lead solution was reacted in 0.5 ml of 0.03% PAR solution, with 1 ml ammonium chloride buffer; the absorption of this solution was measured by a photometer. The results show the limit of detection (LOD) was 0.01 mg/l. The limit of quantification (LOQ) was 0.03 mg/l. The percent recovery of the lead concentrations of 0.05 - 3.0 mg/l was 94.0 to 103.5%. The precision presented as %CV ranged from 0.65 to 10.27%. Lead concentration in a lead smelting factory detected by this method was not significantly different from that detected by the NIOSH method: 7,303 at a 95% confidence level.     

Number needed to treat (NNT): implication in rheumatology clinical practice

OBJECTIVE: To calculate the number needed to treat (NNT) and number needed to harm (NNH) from the data in rheumatology clinical trials and systematic reviews. METHODS: The NNTs for the clinically important outcome measures in the rheumatology systematic reviews from the Cochrane Library, issue 2, 2000 and in the original randomised, double blind, controlled trials were calculated. The measure used for calculating the NNT in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) interventions was the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement or Paulus criteria; in osteoarthritis (OA) interventions, the improvement of pain; and in systemic sclerosis (SSc) interventions, the improvement of Raynaud's phenomenon. The NNH was calculated from the rate of withdrawals due to adverse events from the treatment. RESULTS: The data required for the calculation of the NNT were available in 15 systematic reviews and 11 original articles. For RA interventions, etanercept treatment for six months had the smallest NNT (1.6; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.4 to 2.0), whereas leflunomide had the largest NNH (9.6; 95% CI 6.8 to 16.7). For OA treatment options, only etodolac and tenoxicam produced significant pain relief compared with placebo (NNT=4.4; 95% CI 2.4 to 24.4 and 3.8; 95% CI 2.5 to 7.3, respectively). For SSc interventions, none were shown to be efficacious in improving Raynaud's phenomenon because the 95% CI of the NNT was infinite. CONCLUSIONS: The NNT and NNH are helpful for clinicians, enabling them to translate the results from clinical trials and systematic reviews to use in routine clinical practice. Both NNT and NNH should be accompanied by a limited 95% CI and adjusted for the individual subject's baseline risk.     

Inflammatory cytokine levels,disease activity,and function of patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with combined conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs or biologics

The objective of this study was to compare the effects of treatment by combined conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (cDMARDs) or biologics on cytokines, disease activity, and function in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Sera from a cohort of 81 patients with long-standing RA treated with combined cDMARDs or biologics were measured for 12 cytokines. Comparisons of serum cytokine concentrations with treatment types (combination 2, 3 cDMARDs or biologics), serologic status (positivity for RF and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody (anti-CCP Ab)), DAS28-ESR, and function were performed. Spearman correlation coefficients between individual cytokines and clinical parameters were explored. Approximately half of the patients were prescribed two cDMARDs. Mean duration of current treatment was 42 months. More than 70 % had moderate disease activity or normal function/slight disability. Serum concentrations of interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-17A, IL-23, IL-33, interferon (IFN)-γ, granulocyte monocyte-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF), and TNF-α in patients taking combined cDMARDs did not significantly differ from those on biologics. Seventy-nine serum samples (97.5 %) had undetectable levels of 1 to 10 cytokines. Concentrations of several cytokines were significantly higher in patients with moderate to high disease activity, seropositive or poor functional status. Weak correlations between cytokine levels and RA disease activity or function were demonstrated. The highest correlation coefficients were observed with IL-33, IL-8, and IL-6. Long-term treatment with cDMARDs did not differ from biologics with respect to cytokine concentrations, disease activity, and function. The cytokine profiles in established RA were mainly those produced from effector cells, especially IL-6, IL-8, and IL-33. Both IL-8 and IL-33 may be potential biomarkers and/or treatment targets in patients with late RA.     

Prevalence and out-patient medical costs of comorbid conditions in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

ObjectivesTo evaluate the prevalence, types, and out-patient direct medical costs of comorbid conditions in patients with RA in Thailand.MethodsInformation of the patients with RA treated by rheumatologists with at least one disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), including demographic data, RA-related medication types and treatment costs, comorbidity-related medication types and treatment costs, and total direct medical costs, was captured from King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital databases.ResultsThe data from 684 patients with RA were included for analysis. The majority of the patients were prescribed combined DMARDs, while only 2.5% received biologics. Comorbid conditions were reported in 434 patients (63.5%). The most common comorbid condition was hypertension (51.2%). Advanced age and presence of healthcare coverage was associated with comorbid conditions. The average annual cost of non-RA-related treatments in patients with comorbid diseases was 15 times the cost in those without comorbidities (1546 vs. 104 USD; P < 0.001) while the total direct medical cost in patients with comorbid conditions was twice that in patients without comorbid diseases (4118 vs. 2045 USD; P < 0.001). Parameters that influenced total direct medical costs were RA medications costs, comorbidity, healthcare coverage, patient's age, and types of DMARDs.ConclusionsComorbid conditions were common in this study. However, the major cost component incurred in RA patients was the costs of RA medications and services, while the out-patient costs of comorbid conditions accounted for approximately 38% of the total costs.     

Leflunomide for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and metaanalysis

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the evidence from clinical trials on the efficacy and toxicity of leflunomide for the treatment of active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: We searched Medline, Embase, Current Contents, and the Cochrane Controlled Trial Register for human randomized controlled trials (RCT) and controlled clinical trials up to December 2001. We also hand-searched reference lists and conference proceedings and consulted content experts. Relative benefit (RB), and weighted mean differences or standardized mean differences with their 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were calculated. RESULTS: Six RCT totaling 2044 patients with RA were included in this review. Using specific criteria, all trials were considered of high methodological quality. Leflunomide improved the ACR20 response rate roughly 2 times over placebo both at 6 months (RB = 1.93, 95% CI 1.51, 2.47) and at 12 months (RB = 1.99, 95% CI 1.42, 2.77). Other clinical outcomes of disease activity and function and radiological scores were also significantly better for leflunomide patients than those taking placebo. No significant differences for most of the outcomes were observed between leflunomide and sulfasalazine (SSZ) or methotrexate (MTX). Adverse events were more common in the leflunomide group, but withdrawal rates were fewer than for placebo. Overall, withdrawal rates and adverse events in the leflunomide group were not different from SSZ or MTX. CONCLUSION: Leflunomide improves all clinical outcomes and delays radiographic progression at 6 and 12 months of RA treatment compared to placebo. Its efficacy and adverse events at 2 years of treatment are comparable to SSZ and MTX. Longterm efficacy and toxicity remain to be established.     

Toward point-of-care microchip profiling of proteins

Profiling of protein biomarkers is powerful for the analysis of complex proteomes altered during the progression of diseases. Lab-on-a-chip technologies can potentially provide the throughput and efficiency required for point-of-care and clinical applications. While initial studies utilized 1D microchip separation techniques, researchers have recently developed novel 2D microchip separation platforms with the ability to profile thousands of proteins more effectively. Despite advancements in lab-on-a-chip technologies, very few reports have demonstrated a point-of-care microchip-based profiling of proteins. In this review, recent progress in 1D and 2D microchip profiling of protein mixtures of a biological sample with potential point-of-care applications are discussed. A selection of recent microchip immunoassay-based techniques is also highlighted.