Cabergoline compared to levodopa in the treatment of patients with severe restless legs syndrome: results from a multi-center, randomized, active controlled trial.

We report the first large-scale double-blind, randomly assigned study to compare two active dopaminergic therapies for Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS), the dopamine agonist cabergoline (CAB) and levodopa/benserazide (levodopa). Patients with idiopathic RLS were treated with fixed daily doses of 2 or 3 mg CAB or 200 or 300 mg levodopa for 30 weeks. Efficacy was assessed by changes in the IRLS (International RLS Severity Scale) and by time to discontinuation of treatment due to loss of efficacy or augmentation. 361 of 418 screened patients (age 58 +/- 12 years, 71% females) were randomly assigned and treated (CAB: n = 178; levodopa: n = 183) in 51 centers of four European countries. Baseline IRLS total score was 25.7 +/- 6.8. The baseline-adjusted mean change from baseline to week 6 in IRLS sum score was d = -16.1 in the CAB group and d = -9.5 in the levodopa group (d = -6.6, P < 0.0001). More patients in the levodopa group (24.0%) than in the CAB group (11.9%, P = 0.0029, log-rank test) discontinued because of loss of efficacy (14.2% vs. 7.9%, P = 0.0290) or augmentation (9.8% vs. 4.0%, P = 0.0412). Adverse events (AEs) occurred in 83.1% of the CAB group and in 77.6% of the levodopa group. In both groups, most frequent AEs were gastrointestinal symptoms (CAB: 55.6%, levodopa: 30.6%, P < 0.0001). This first large-scale active controlled study in RLS showed superior efficacy of cabergoline versus levodopa after a 30-week long-term therapy. Tolerability was found more favorable with levodopa than with cabergoline.     

pH dependence of the blocking activity of carbisocaine and its derivatives

The blocking activity and pH dependence of carbanilate local anaesthetics, carbisocaine and its homologues, were tested on isolated rat sciatic nerves at pH 6.0, 7.2 and 8.4. Carbisocaine blocked the compound action potential more strongly than the derivatives with shorter alkoxysubstituents. The blocking potency of shorter derivatives increased with the rise of external medium pH, whereas the activity of carbisocaine increased with decreasing external pH. Quaternary compounds applied in the external medium were able to block the action potential, but in higher concentrations and with a longer half-time than their tertiary analogues. The blocking potency of quaternary derivatives correlated well with the length of the alkoxysubstituent and thus also with their lipophilicity. Extracellular pH did not consistently change the inhibitory effect of quaternized derivatives. These observations support the view that the lipophilicity of local anaesthetics is one of the possible factors determining their anaesthetic activity and the pH dependence of their effect.     

Clinical impact of CCM mutation detection in familial cavernous angioma

Introduction and background A 3-year-old Bosnian girl with a large symptomatic brainstem and multiple supratentorial cavernous angiomas, who underwent neurosurgical treatment, is presented. As multiple cavernomas are more common in familial cases, genetic analyses and neuroradiological imaging were performed in the patient and her parents to see whether there was any evidence for inheritance. This information is important for genetic counseling and provision of medical care for at-risk relatives. Currently, no recommendation is available on how to manage these cases.Results Genetic analyses demonstrated a novel CCM1 frameshift mutation (c.1683_1684insA; p.V562SfsX6) in the child and the asymptomatic 27-year-old mother. Sensitive gradient-echo magnetic resonance imaging of the mother revealed multiple supratentorial lesions, whereas analogous imaging of the father showed no pathological findings.Conclusion This case exemplifies that seemingly sporadic cases with multiple lesions might well be hereditary and that presymptomatic genetic testing of family members may identify relatives for whom clinical and neuroradiological monitoring is indicated.     

Evaluation and selection of candidates for renal transplantation at the Clinical Hospital Center in Rijeka

On December 31, 2001, 2486 patients with terminal renal failure received dialysis treatment in Croatia. Only one third of the patients are registered on the national waiting list for cadaveric kidney transplant. In most of the others, transplantation is impossible because of comorbidity. This is mainly due to the steadily growing age of the dialytic population and therefore a higher incidence of cardiovascular disease and diabetes. Still, evaluation of the potential recipients of cadaveric kidney transplant, registered on the waiting list, often reveals contraindications for transplantation. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence and type of contraindications in transplant candidates, found during immediate preoperative evaluation. Analysis of these data should help in determining how contraindications can be early detected and prevented. Before registering onto the national waiting list transplant candidates need to be thoroughly investigated including detailed history, physical examination, routine diagnostic procedures and additional examinations, if needed, to exclude or evaluate the possibly existing contraindications for transplantation. During the period from January 1997 until June 2002, 145 potential recipients from the national waiting list were referred to the Rijeka University Hospital Center and evaluated for kidney transplantation. Eighty-eight patients underwent transplantation. Preoperative evaluation revealed contraindications for transplantation in 52 (35.9%) candidates. Twenty-two (15.2%) patients had a positive cross-match with donor lymphocytes, 6 (4.1%) patients refused transplantation, and in 24 (16.6%) patients serious comorbidity was the reason for not being accepted for transplantation and for their withdrawal from the national waiting list. Comorbidity was mainly due to cardiovascular disease (12 patients--8.3%) and infection (8 patients--5.5%). These data show a high incidence of contraindications found during the immediate preoperative evaluation of potential kidney recipients. It was the case in more than one third of patients. During the evaluation of potential candidates for kidney transplantation special attention should be addressed to the presence of cardiovascular morbidity and infection. Peripheral vascular occlusive disease, cardiac status and/or cerebrovascular disease should be evaluated. Measures used to treat or reduce the development of complications include an optimal control of blood pressure, serum phosphate, hyperparathyroidism, dyslipidemia, and renal anemia. The sites of infection must be treated and eradicated, because immunosuppressive treatment is a threat to the transplant recipient's life. The second most common cause of refusal of potential candidates was a positive cross-match with donor lymphocytes. Sensitization to human leukocyte antigens can be prevented by the avoiding of blood transfusions and use of erythopoietin in treating renal anemia. To minimize the morbidity and mortality, the potential kidney recipients should undergo rigorous selection and thorough evaluation before including them into the waiting list for kidney transplantation. Afterwards, regular examinations are obligatory to reveal contraindications, proceed to medical interventions and treat concomitant diseases in time, which can influence the patient's survival. In case that contraindications for transplantation arise, the patient must be temporarily or definitely removed from the waiting list.