A prospective study of Autologous Growth Factors (AGF) in lumbar interbody fusion.

BACKGROUND: Numerous preclinical and clinical studies have reported on the use of platelet concentrates to promote tissue healing. The results in spinal fusion applications are limited and controversial. PURPOSE: The purpose of the current prospective clinical cohort study is to assess the effect of Autologous Growth Factors (AGF) on lumbar interbody fusion with specific attention paid to determination of clinical and radiographic outcomes. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Prospective clinical study PATIENT SAMPLE: Candidates for anterior-posterior lumbar fusion with diagnosis of degenerative disc disease and/or up to grade I spondylolytic spondylolisthesis based on positive provocative discography. OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinical (visual analogue pain scale/functional outcome assessment) and radiographic outcomes (fusion on computed tomography at 6 months and plain radiographs at 12 and 24 months). METHODS: Thirty-seven patients were assigned to standard anterior-posterior interbody fusion L2-S1 (single or two-level) using iliac crest bone graft (autograft group: 22 patients with 32 levels operated) or allograft combined with autogenous growth factors (AGF group: 15 patients with 25 levels operated). Radiographic outcomes were collected at 6 months postsurgery with computed tomography and at 12 and 24 months with plain radiographs. Pre- and postoperative clinical outcome measures included visual analog scores (VAS) for back and leg pain (0-10), SF-36 scores, and Oswestry disability determination. Average clinical and radiographic follow-up for the autograft group was 24.3+/-5.6 months (12-36 months) and AGF was 25.7+/-7.5 (6-40 months). RESULTS: Fusion incorporation at each end plate was determined at 56% in both autograft and AGF (p=NS) patients based on computed tomography at 6 months with minimal subsidence noted and no direct correlation between the incidence or degree of cage subsidence and bone graft technique. The 12- and 24-month radiographic results confirmed an 85% arthrodesis rate for the autograft patients, whereas the AGF patients had an 89% fusion rate (p=NS). Clinical outcomes were similar for both groups and no significant differences were noted for pain or functional outcome improvements. CONCLUSIONS: AGF combined with an allograft carrier is equivalent in radiographic and clinical outcomes to autograft in one- or two-level lumbar interbody fusion with supplemental posterior fixation and, thus, eliminates any morbidity from iliac crest bone graft harvesting. AGF combined with an appropriate carrier is a reasonable alternative to autograft and expensive bone induction technologies. Further research is still required to examine the optimum carriers, preparation and formulation, and platelet concentrations for this technology.     

Identification of a human tumor-derived lipolysis-promoting factor.

Our previous studies have demonstrated the production and release of a tumor-derived factor that promoted lipolysis in normal adipocytes. We further demonstrated that this in vitro lipolysis was correlated with the in vivo loss of total carcass lipids induced by the presence of the same tumor. This study identified and isolated this "lipolysis-promoting" factor (LPF), released into the extracellular environment (conditioned media) by the human A375 melanoma cell line, which appears to be responsible for the previously demonstrated induction of in vitro and in vivo lipolytic activity. Unlike previously described non-tumor-derived molecules, such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha/cachectin, which have been implicated in cancer cachexia, the LPF induces alterations in lipid metabolism similar to those observed in cancer patients. The biochemical nature of human tumor-derived LPF appears to be a heat-stable molecule with an apparent molecular weight of approximately 6000. The lipolysis-promoting activity was trichloroacetic acid precipitable, but not precipitable with protamine sulfate or extractable with chloroform:methanol. Its activity appears to be resistant to enzymatic treatments with protease K, trypsin, Pronase, RNase, and DNase, as well as to periodate oxidation. Immunochemically, LPF appears to be distinct from tumor necrosis factor-alpha/cachectin. Furthermore, in contrast to the mechanism of action of tumor necrosis factor-alpha/cachectin, the mechanism of "lipolysis promotion" by LPF appears to be by the induction of cellular lipase activity.     

Prospective comparison of the effect of direct current electrical stimulation and pulsed electromagnetic fields on instrumented posterolateral lumbar arthrodesis

The purpose of this prospective study was to compare the effect of adjunctive direct current (DC) electrical stimulation and pulsed electromagnetic field therapy (PEMF) on augmentation of instrumented lumbar fusion. Sixty-one patients undergoing lumbar spine fusion were enrolled in the study and randomized to one of three treatment protocols: 1) adjunctive PEMF group (n = 22) fitted with Spinal-Stim model 8212(AME) within 30 days of surgery; 2) DC group (n = 17) had a SpF-2T stimulator(EBI) implanted at the time of surgery; or 3) control group (n = 22). The fusion mass bone mineral density (BMD) assessment was performed on 3-month and 1-year radiographs for each patient. Lateral flexion-extension and anteroposterior radiographs were evaluated at 1 year to determine the presence of fusion. Clinical outcome patient analyses were performed at 1 year. At 1-year follow-up, radiographic fusion and fusion mass bone density were not significantly different among the groups. In the nonstimulated group, there were 43% excellent, 43% good, and 14% fair results. In the PEMF group, there were 35% excellent, 50% good, 10% fair, and 5% poor results. In the DC group, there were 32% excellent, 37% good, and 31% fair results. The results of the current study suggest that electrical stimulation does not significantly enhance fusion rate in instrumented lumbar arthrodesis, although we observed a statistically insignificant trend toward increased fusion mass BMD in the electrically stimulated groups. The significance of increased BMD remains unknown.