Cholelithiasis: Therapeutisches Splitting als Standard?

At the moment, therapeutic splitting is still regarded by the vast majority of surgeons as the gold standard for stones in the common bile duct. Endoscopic clearance of the duct certainly is much less invasive than open exploration. However, this does not apply when compared with laparoscopic stone removal. Both are equivalent in respect to stone clearance rates, but the laparoscopic techniques protect patients from the long-term sequelae of endoscopic papillotomy. This can be important particularly for younger patients. Laparoscopic bile duct exploration is cost-effective and safe. Special experience in laparoscopic surgical techniques, however, is mandatory. Thus, surgeons should intensify their training in laparoscopic bile duct exploration in order to increase the acceptance of these techniques.     

Current practice patterns in pancreatic surgery: Results of a multi-institutional analysis of seven large surgical departments in germany with 1454 pancreatic head resections, 1999 to 2004 (german advanced surgical treatment study group)

Despite decreasing mortality rates, morbidity is still high after pancreatic head resection. Comparative data in the United States and Europe show a relationship between hospital volume and mortality. Treatment strategies vary frequently, partially because of the lack of evidence-based data. We performed a multi-institutional analysis in Germany evaluating current numbers, indications, techniques, and complication rates of pancreatic head resection. Questionnaires were completed by seven high-volume surgical departments regarding quantitative and qualitative aspects of pancreatic head resections in the period from 1999 to 2004 (five prospective and two retrospective institutional databases). A total of 1454 pancreatic head resections (944 for malignancy) were reported. Mean annual hospital volume ranged from 14 to 52 (10 to 43 in malignancy). Mortality was between 1.1% and 4.8%, morbidity was between 24% and 46%, and pancreatic leakage was between 9% and 20%. In malignant disease, all centers perform standard lymphadenectomy and regard arterial infiltration as a contraindication for resection. However, the rate of portal vein resection varied from 0% to 28%. No consensus is seen on the type of surgery for malignancy and chronic pancreatitis. After resection for pancreatic cancer less than one fourth of the patients receive adjuvant therapy. The results of our analysis in Germany confirm that pancreatic head resection can be performed with low mortality in specialized units. Variations in indications, operative technique, and perioperative care may demonstrate the lack of evidence-based data and/or personal and institutional experience. The low number of patients receiving adjuvant therapy after resection of pancreatic cancer suggests that more efforts must be made to establish novel adjuvant therapies under randomized study conditions. Presented at the Forty-Sixth Annual Meeting of The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, Chicago, Illinois, May 14–18, 2005 (oral presentation).     

Does glucagon stimulation predict oral glucose tolerance in patients after simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation?

BACKGROUNDS: Exogenous glucagon rapidly stimulates insulin secretion. This test has been used to estimate insulin secretory capacity, which may predict oral glucose tolerance in patients after pancreas transplantation. METHODS: In 32 pancreas-kidney transplant recipients, in 10 nondiabetic kidney transplant recipients, and in 9 healthy control subjects, a glucagon stimulation test (1 mg i.v.) and a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test were performed with determination of glucose, insulin, and C-peptide profiles. RESULTS: Of 16 pancreas transplant recipients with the lowest insulin responses after glucagon, 7 had an impaired oral glucose tolerance, in contrast to 1 of 16 with high insulin responses (P=0.037). A low insulin response after glucagon was associated with significantly lower 120-min glucose concentrations (P=0.043) and a lower integrated incremental insulin response after oral glucose (P=0.006). CONCLUSIONS: In pancreas-kidney transplant recipients, a low insulin response after intravenous glucagon predicts a reduced insulin response after oral glucose and an impaired oral glucose tolerance. This simple test may be helpful in the follow-up of pancreas transplant recipients.     

Blood Pressure Recordings During Hemodialysis Access Interventions: Implications for Acute Management

A retrospective study evaluating the pattern of blood pressure and its related complications before, during, and after percutaneous hemodialysis interventions was performed in patients presenting with asymptomatic hypertension. Hemodialysis patients undergoing percutaneous interventions including tunneled hemodialysis catheter insertion, percutaneous balloon angioplasty and thrombectomy procedure, and stage II hypertension (systolic blood pressure ≥160 mmHg) were included in this analysis. Blood pressure medications were not used while midazolam and fentanyl were routinely administered. Patients were followed for up to 4 weeks to monitor any complications. The mean blood pressure before, during, and after the procedures were 185 ± 18/96 ± 14, 172 ± 22/92 ± 15, and 153 ± 25/87 ± 14, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between the blood pressure readings before and after the procedure (before = 185 ± 18/96 ± 14, after = 153 ± 25/87 ± 14; p = 0.001). None of the patients had a stroke, myocardial infarction, or acute pulmonary edema before, during, or after the procedure or during the 4‐week follow‐up period. A significant reduction in blood pressure was observed after the procedure without the administration of any antihypertensive medication. These results suggest that the reduction in blood pressure observed after percutaneous dialysis access interventions (particularly in the presence of midazolam and fentanyl) may make it unnecessary to treat asymptomatic hypertension prior to these procedures.     

Covered self-expanding stent treatment for anastomotic leakage: outcomes in esophagogastric and esophagojejunal anastomoses

Background

Anastomotic leakage of esophagogastric and esophagojejunal anastomoses is a severe complication after esophagectomy and gastrectomy associated with a high mortality. We conducted this non-randomized observational study to evaluate the outcomes and clinical effectiveness of covered self-expanding stents (CSESs) in treating esophageal anastomotic leakage.

Methods

From 2002 to 2013, consecutive patients with anastomotic leakage after esophagogastrostomy or esophagojejunostomy who received CSESs were analyzed concerning leakage characteristics, leakage sealing rate, success and failure rates of CSES treatment, stent-related complications, and mortality.

Results

In 35 patients, anastomotic leakage originating from 5 cervical esophagogastrostomies, 6 thoracic esophagogastrostomies, 12 mediastinal esophagojejunostomies and 12 abdominal esophagojejunostomies were treated with 48 CSESs (16 fully CSES, 32 partially CSES). Of 35 patients, 24 received one stent, 9 received two consecutive stents, and 2 received three consecutive stents. Stent-related complications occurred in 71 % of patients (25/35). The most frequent complications were leakage persistence (44 %) and stent dislocation (19 %). Sealing of the anastomotic leakage was achieved in 24 (69 %) patients after a median (range) stenting time of 19 (1–78) days. Sealing rates differed significantly with 20 % (cervical esophagogastrostomies), 50 % (thoracic esophagogastrostomies), 92 % (mediastinal esophagojejunostomies) and 67 % (abdominal esophagojejunostomies) of patients (p = 0.023). Moreover, clinical success rates differed among these groups (60 vs. 67 vs. 92 vs. 58 %; p = 0.247). Clinical failure of stent treatment was more likely to be recognized in early postoperative leakage (median postoperative day 3 vs. 8; p = 0.098) compared with successful treatment, whereas no difference for clinical success rates was found comparing leakage ≤10 versus >10 mm (68 vs. 64 %; p = 0.479).

Conclusion

CSESs are an effective treatment for anastomotic leakage in patients with esophagogastrostomies and esophagojejunostomies. Best results can be achieved in patients with anastomotic leakages following mediastinal esophagojejunostomy, and in leakages occurring after the very early postoperative phase.