DMARD combination therapy in rheumatoid arthritis: 5‐year follow‐up results in a daily practice setting

Aim: To evaluate the overall effect of disease modifying anti‐rheumatic drug (DMARD) combination therapy in daily practice. Methods: In a retrospective study, 161 consecutive files of patients who attended regular follow‐up sessions, seen from 1998, were analysed. Their data were extracted at baseline, 6 months, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years. American College of Rheumatology ACR70 criteria was chosen for the evaluation of the global result. DMARD combination was methotrexate (7.5–15 mg weekly) and chloroquine (150 mg daily), with low‐dose prednisolone (less than 10 mg daily). In cases of remission, methotrexate was gradually tapered, then prednisolone. Chloroquine was discontinued after 1 year if no recurrence occurred at low‐dose (150 mg every other day). In cases of recurrence at any stage, the treatment scheme was stepped back. Results: The data of 161 patients were analysed. One hundred and six were rheumatoid factor positive (RF+) (66%). ACR 70 for all patients at 6 months follow‐up was 72.5% (95% CI = 7.0); at 1 year, 75.8% (95% CI = 6.7); at 2 years, 72.2% (95% CI = 7.2); at 3 years, 78.9% (95% CI = 6.6); at 4 years, 78.4% (95% CI = 6.9); and at 5 years, 70.6% (95% CI = 8.5). Conclusion: The classical DMARD combination therapy, when used with adequate low‐dose prednisolone, gave an ACR70 response from 71–79%. The efficacy of the treatment did not fade over time. RF– patients did better than RF+ patients, but the difference was not statistically significant.     

Posttraumatic stress disorder and associated risk factors in Canadian peacekeeping veterans with health-related disabilities.

OBJECTIVES: This study investigates posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and its associated risk factors in a random, national, Canadian sample of United Nations peacekeeping veterans with service-related disabilities. METHODS: Participants included 1016 male veterans (age < 65 years) who served in the Canadian Forces from 1990 to 1999 and were selected from a larger random sample of 1968 veterans who voluntarily and anonymously completed a general health survey conducted by Veterans Affairs Canada in 1999. Survey instruments included the PTSD Checklist-Military Version (PCL-M), Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale (CES-D), and questionnaires regarding life events during the past year, current stressors, sociodemographic characteristics, and military history. RESULTS: We found that rates of probable PTSD (PCL-M score > 50) among veterans were 10.92% for veterans deployed once and 14.84% for those deployed more than once. The rates of probable clinical depression (CES-D score > 16) were 30.35% for veterans deployed once and 32.62% for those deployed more than once. We found that, in multivariate analyses, probable PTSD rates and PTSD severity were associated with younger age, single marital status, and deployment frequency. CONCLUSIONS: PTSD is an important health concern in the veteran population. Understanding such risk factors as younger age and unmarried status can help predict morbidity among trauma-exposed veterans.     

Phase I study of high-dose cytosine arabinoside and etoposide in patients with advanced malignancies

Summary Cytosine arabinsodie (ara-C) and etoposide (VP-16) display synergy in the laboratory. Twenty-six patients participated in a phase I study of high-dose ara-C in combination with VP-16. The dose of VP-16 was held constant at 50 mg/m² as an intermittent infusion over 33 h; escalating doses of ara-C were given as infusions during hours 9–12 and 21–24. Myelosuppression was the dose-limiting toxicity and occurred with doses considerably less than those expected from studies of the two drugs as single agents. The suggested initial doses for phase II trials with this schedule are 750 mg/m²×2 doses of ara-C and 50 mg/m² of VP-16. Nonhematologic toxicity was minimal; therefore, further dose escalation is feasible in patients in whom myelosuppression is acceptable.Supported in part by grants from the National Cancer Institute (CA-12197 and CA-09422) and the American Cancer Society CF-85-182     

Guidelines for Cardiac Management in Noncardiac Surgery Are Poorly Implemented in Clinical Practice: Results from a Peripheral Vascular Survey in The Netherlands

Background: The American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines for Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery recommend an algorithm for a stepwise approach to preoperative cardiac assessment in vascular surgery patients. The authors' main objective was to determine adherence to the ACC/AHA guidelines on perioperative care in daily clinical practice.

Methods: Between May and December 2004, data on 711 consecutive peripheral vascular surgery patients were collected from 11 hospitals in The Netherlands. This survey was conducted within the infrastructure of the Euro Heart Survey Programme. The authors retrospectively applied the ACC/AHA guideline algorithm to each patient in their data set and subsequently compared observed clinical practice data with these recommendations.

Results: Although 185 of the total 711 patients (26%) fulfilled the ACC/AHA guideline criteria to recommend preoperative noninvasive cardiac testing, clinicians had performed testing in only 38 of those cases (21%). Conversely, of the 526 patients for whom noninvasive testing was not recommended, guidelines were followed in 467 patients (89%). Overall, patients who had not been tested, irrespective of guideline recommendation, received less cardioprotective medications, whereas patients who underwent noninvasive testing were significantly more often treated with cardiovascular drugs ([beta]-blockers 43% vs. 77%, statins 52% vs. 83%, platelet inhibitors 80% vs. 85%, respectively; all P < 0.05). Moreover, the authors did not observe significant differences in cardiovascular medical therapy between patients with a normal test result and patients with an abnormal test result.