The interaction of endothelin receptor responses in the isolated perfused rat lung

To gain more insight into the complex pulmonary interactions of endothelins (ET), we studied airway and vascular responses to endothelins in isolated perfused rat lungs in the presence of the novel ET_B-receptor antagonist BQ788. In particular we focused on airway responses and on prostacyclin release. The effectiveness of BQ788 in our system was shown by its ability to concentration-dependently prevent vasoconstriction (IC₅₀ 0.1μM), bronchoconstriction (IC₅₀ 0.1μM) and prostacyclin production (IC₅₀<0.1μM) induced by the ET_B-receptor agonist IRL1620 (1nmol). Airway responses to ET-1: ET-1-induced bronchoconstriction was aggravated by BQ123 (1 or 8μM), while BQ788 pretreatment (1 or 8μM) showed no significant effect. Simultaneous treatment with 8μM BQ123 and BQ788 attenuated the ET-1-induced bronchoconstriction. Vascular responses to ET-1: ET-1 (1nmol)-induced vasoconstriction was potentiated by BQ788 (1 or 8μM), but attenuated by the ET_A-receptor antagonist BQ123 (1μM). In the presence of BQ788 diminished amounts of the stable prostacyclin metabolite 6-keto-PGF_1α were detected in the perfusate. Simultaneous treatment with 8μM BQ123 and BQ788 completely prevented the ET-1-induced vasoconstriction. Conclusions: Both ET_A- and ET_B-receptors contribute to ET-1-induced vasoconstriction and bronchoconstriction. The ET-1-induced vasoconstriction is attenuated by stimulation of ET_B-receptors, a response that is partly mediated by prostacyclin. Due to the mutual interactions between ET_A- and ET_B-receptors, simultaneous inhibition of both receptors is required to prevent the deleterious effects of ET-1 on lung functions. Received: 17 October 1996 / Accepted: 16 May 1997     

A randomized controlled trial of electromagnetic therapy in the primary care management of venous leg ulceration

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to establish the potential efficacy, tolerabilityand side-effect profile of electromagnetic therapy as an adjunctto conventional dressings in the treatment of venous leg ulcers. METHOD: A prospective, randomized, double blind controlled clinicaltrial was carried out in a dedicated leg ulcer clinic basedin one urban general practice. Nineteen patients with leg ulcersof confirmed venous aetiology were assessed. The main outcomemeasures were rate and scale of venous leg ulcer healing, changesin patient-reported pain levels, quality of life, degree ofmobility, side effect profile and acceptability to patientsand staff. RESULTS: Sixty-eight per cent of patients attending this dedicated clinicachieved improvements in the size of their ulcer (4, 21%, healedfully) and in reduced pain levels (P < 0.05) during the trial,despite the chronicity of ulcer histories. Patients treatedwith electromagnetic therapy at 800 Hz were found at day 50to have significantly greater healing (P < 0.05) and paincontrol (P < 0.05) than placebo therapy or treatment with600 Hz. All patients reported improved mobility at the end ofthe study. The electromagnetic therapy was well tolerated bypatients, with no differences between groups in reporting adverseevents, and proved acceptable to staff. CONCLUSION: Despite the small numbers in this pilot study, electromagnetictherapy provided significant gains in the healing of venousleg ulcers and reduction in pain. Keywords. Electromagnetic therapy, RCT, leg ulcers, primary care.