Cardiovascular events in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery treated with remote ischaemic preconditioning: 1-year follow-up of a randomised clinical trial

Remote ischaemic preconditioning reduces the risk of myocardial injury within 4 days of hip fracture surgery. We aimed to investigate the effect of remote ischaemic preconditioning on the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events 1 year after hip fracture surgery. We performed a phase-2, multicentre, randomised, observer-blinded, clinical trial between February 2015 and September 2017. We studied patients aged ≥ 45 years with a hip fracture and a minimum of one cardiovascular risk factor. Patients were allocated randomly to remote ischaemic preconditioning applied just before surgery or no treatment (control group). Remote ischaemic preconditioning was performed on the upper arm with a tourniquet in four cycles of 5 min ischaemia and 5 min reperfusion. Primary outcome was the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events within 1 year of surgery. A total of 316 patients were allocated randomly to the remote ischaemic preconditioning group and 309 patients to the control group. Major adverse cardiovascular events occurred in 43 patients (13.6%) in the remote ischaemic preconditioning group compared with 51 patients (16.5%) in the control group (adjusted hazard ratio (95%CI) 0.83 (0.55–1.25); p = 0.37). Fewer patients in the remote ischaemic preconditioning group had a myocardial infarction (11 (3.5%) vs. 22 (7.1%); hazard ratio (95%CI) 0.48 (CI 0.23–1.00); p = 0.04). Remote ischaemic preconditioning did not reduce the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events within 1 year of hip fracture surgery. The effect of remote ischaemic preconditioning on clinical cardiovascular outcomes in non-cardiac surgery needs confirmation in appropriately powered randomised clinical trials.     

The Effect of Perioperative Iron Therapy in Acute Major Non-cardiac Surgery on Allogenic Blood Transfusion and Postoperative Haemoglobin Levels: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background

Perioperative anaemia in relation to surgery is associated with adverse clinical outcomes. In an elective surgical setting, it is possible to optimize patients prior to surgery, often by iron supplementation with correction of anaemia. Possibilities for optimization prior to and during acute surgical procedures are limited. This review investigates whether iron treatment initiated perioperatively improves outcomes in patients undergoing major acute non-cardiac surgery.

Method

This systematic review was performed using PubMed, EMBASE (Ovid) and Scopus to identify current evidence on iron supplementation in acute surgery. Primary outcomes were allogenic blood transfusion (ABT) rate and changes in haemoglobin. Secondary outcomes were postoperative mortality, length of stay (LOS), and postoperative complications. Iron was administered at latest within 24 h after end of surgery.

Results

Of the 5413 studies screened, four randomized controlled trials and nine observational cohort studies were included. Ten studies included patients with hip fractures. A meta-analysis of seven studies showed a risk reduction of transfusion (OR = 0.35 CI 95% (0.20–0.63), p = 0.0004, I² = 66%). No influence on plasma haemoglobin was found. Postoperative mortality was reduced in the iron therapy group in a meta-analysis of four observational studies (OR 0.50 (CI 95% 0.26–0.96) p = 0.04). No effect was found on LOS, but a reduction in postoperative infection was seen in four studies.

Conclusions

This review examined perioperative iron therapy in acute major non-cardiac surgery. IV iron showed a lower 30-day mortality, a reduction in postoperative infections and a reduction in ABT largely due to the observational studies. The review primarily consisted of small observational studies and does not have the power to formally recommend this practice.

     

Evaluation of two methods to calculate p50 from a single blood sample

BACKGROUND: The hemoglobin-oxygen affinity is conveniently described as the oxygen tension at which the hemoglobin is 50% saturated (p50). We compared two methods of single-point analysis for p50 calculation, using clinical data. METHODS: From patients submitted to anesthesia for major surgery, 114 arterial or venous blood samples were analyzed by using the Sigaard-Andersen oxygen status algorithm (p50OSA) and Doyle's method (p50Doyle) based on Hill's equation. RESULTS: The oxygen saturation and tension varied respectively between 0.64-0.96 and 3.8 kPa-11.0 kPa. A Bland-Altman analysis showed a mean difference of 0.04 kPa (SD 0.12 kPa). The limits of agreement were -0.20 kPa and +0.28 kPa. CONCLUSIONS: The Siggaard-Andersen oxygen status algorithm is presently the most clinically useful single-point method of p50 calculation.     

Effect of Intracoronary and Intravenous Melatonin on Myocardial Salvage Index in Patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: a Randomized Placebo Controlled Trial

Melatonin has attenuated myocardial ischemia reperfusion injury in experimental studies. We hypothesized that the administration of melatonin during acute myocardial reperfusion improves myocardial salvage index in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Patients (n = 48) were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to intracoronary and intravenous melatonin (total 50 mg) or placebo. The myocardial salvage index assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging at day 4 (± 1 day) after primary percutaneous coronary intervention was similar in the melatonin group (n = 22) at 55.3% (95% CI 47.0–63.6) and the placebo group (n = 19) at 61.5% (95% CI 57.5–65.5), p = 0.21. The levels of high-sensitive troponin T, creatinine kinase myocardial band, and oxidative biomarkers (advanced oxidation protein products, malondialdehyde, myeloperoxidase) were similar in the groups. The frequency of clinical events at 90 days did not differ between the groups. In conclusion, melatonin did not improve the myocardial salvage index after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction compared with placebo.     

Incidence of Venous Thromboembolism Following Major Emergency Abdominal Surgery

Background

In a retrospective cohort study, we looked at the incidence and risk factors of developing in-hospital venous thromboembolism (VTE) after major emergency abdominal surgery and the risk factors for developing a venous thrombosis.

Methods

Data were extracted through medical records from all patients undergoing major emergency abdominal surgery at a Danish University Hospital from 2010 until 2016. The primary outcome was the incidence of venous thrombosis developed in the time from surgery until discharge from hospital. The secondary outcomes were 30-day mortality and postoperative complications. Multivariate logistic analyses were used for confounder control.

Results

In total, 1179 patients who underwent major emergency abdominal surgery during 2010–2016 were included. Thirteen patients developed a postoperative venous thromboembolism (1.1%) while hospitalized. Eight patients developed a pulmonary embolism all verified by CT scan and five patients developed a deep venous thrombosis verified by ultrasound scan. Patients diagnosed with a VTE were significantly longer in hospital with a length of stay of 34 versus 14 days, P < 0.001, and they suffered significantly more surgical complications (69.2% vs. 30.4%, P = 0.007). Thirty-day mortality was equal in patients with and without a venous thrombosis. In a multivariate analysis adjusting for gender, ASA group, BMI, type of surgery, dalteparin dose and treatment with anticoagulants, we found that a dalteparin dose ≥5000 IU was associated with the risk of postoperative surgical complications (odds ratio 1.55, 95% CI 1.11–2.16, P = 0.009).

Conclusion

In this study, we found a low incidence of venous thrombosis among patients undergoing major emergency abdominal surgery, comparable to the incidence after elective surgery.