Influence of caseload and surgical speciality on outcome following surgery for colorectal cancer: a review of evidence Part 2: Long-term outcome

OBJECTIVE: We reviewed recent literature to assess the impact of hospital caseload, surgeon's caseload and education on long-term outcome following colorectal cancer surgery. METHOD: We searched the MEDLINE and Cochrane Library databases for relevant literature starting from 1992. We selected hospital caseload, surgeon's caseload and surgeon's education, type of hospital, and surgeon's experience as variables of interest. Measures of outcome were recurrence-free survival and overall survival, and for rectal cancer frequency of permanent stoma. We reviewed the 34 studies according to tumour location: colonic cancer, rectal cancer, or colorectal cancer. We described the studies individually and performed a meta-analysis whenever it was considered appropriate. RESULTS: For colonic cancer, overall survival improved with increasing hospital caseload, odds ratio (OR) 1.22 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.16-1.28], and surgeon's education. For rectal cancer, overall survival improved with increasing hospital caseload, OR 1.38 (95% CI 1.19-1.60), and, possibly by surgeon' education and experience. Cancer-free survival was strongly influenced by surgeon's education. The colostomy rate was less in high caseload hospitals, OR 0.76 (95% CI 0.68-0.85). For colorectal cancer, overall survival improved with surgeon's education. CONCLUSION: The data have provided evidence that long-term survival following colorectal cancer surgery in general improved significantly with increasing hospital caseload and surgeon's education.     

Results of long-term follow-up after curative resection of Dukes A colorectal cancer

Patients with Dukes A (UICC I) colorectal cancer have a good prognosis after curative resection. It is not known, however, if the outcome is significantly different for UICC Ia and Ib patients or if patients with reduced risks of recurrences can be identified early after surgery. This is of interest, as it would permit a more cost-effective, patient-oriented, and tumor stage-oriented follow-up program. To study these questions, a prospective follow-up database, including 1375 patients after curative resection of colorectal cancer, was analyzed. A total of 296 patients with Dukes A colorectal cancer with a median follow-up of 44 months were studied. Perioperative and follow-up mortality rates were 3% and 14%, respectively. Recurrent disease developed in 10% of Dukes A patients after a disease-free interval of 16 months. Significantly more patients suffering from pT2 (UICC Ib) cancer had recurrent disease than patients with pT1 (UICC Ia) cancer (13% vs. 4%; p <0.05). Preoperative CEA levels in patients with recurrent disease were significantly higher than in long-term disease-free patients (5.3 +/- 1.8 vs. 3.5 +/- 0.6 ng/ml; p <0.05). Curative resection of recurrent disease was achieved in 38% of the patients with recurrences (4% of all patients). Survival analysis showed significantly better survival in patients with Dukes A cancer than in those at higher tumor stages (log rank, <0.0001), and only 39% of all Dukes A patients who died during follow-up had recurrent disease. Dukes A (UICC Ia and Ib) colorectal cancer was diagnosed in 22% of our patients treated for cure, and long-term survival was 86%. There were significantly fewer cases of recurrent disease after curative resection of UICC Ia (pT1N0M0) cancer, so we propose a novel, less intensive follow-up regimen for these patients, leading to a more cost-effective, patient-oriented, and tumor stage-oriented follow-up program.     

Association of rs1568885, rs1813443 and rs4411591 polymorphisms with anti-TNF medication response in Greek patients with Crohn’s disease

AIM:To investigate the correlation between rs1568885,rs1813443 and rs4411591 polymorphisms and response to infliximab in a cohort of Greek patients with Crohn’s disease(CD).METHODS:One hundred and twenty-six patients diagnosed with CD based on standard clinical,endoscopic,radiological,and pathological criteria were enrolled in this study at the Gastroenterology Unit of the 2nd Department of Surgery and at the Colorectal Unit of the1st Department of Propaedeutic Surgery.Infliximab at a dose of 5 mg/kg was administered intravenously at weeks 0,2,6 and then every 8 wk.Clinical and serological responses were assessed using the HarveyBradshaw Index and serum C-reactive protein(CRP)levels,respectively,and the endoscopic response was evaluated by ileocolonoscopy performed at baseline and after 12-20 wk of therapy.The changes in endoscopic appearance compared to baseline were classified into four categories,and patients were classified as responders and non-responders.Genomic DNA from whole peripheral blood was extracted and genotyping was performed by allele-specific polymerase chain reactions.χ2test with Yate’s correction based on the S-Plus was used to compare the genotype frequencies.RESULTS:Eighty patients(63.49%)were classified as complete and 32(25.39%)as partial responders to infliximab,while 14(11.11%)were primary non-responders.No correlation was found between response to infliximab and patients’characteristics such as age,gender and disease duration.There was consistency between Harvey-Bradshaw index scores and serum CRP levels.The TT genotype of the rs1568885 polymorphism was significantly related to partial response(P=0.024)and resistance to infliximab(P=0.007)while the AT genotype was more frequent in partial responders(P=0.035)and in primary non-responders(P=0.032).Regarding rs1813443,the CC genotype was found to be associated with partial response(P=0.005)and primary resistance(P=0.002)to infliximab while no association was found between the rs4411591 polymorphism and the clinical response to infliximab.CONCLUSION:Based on our results,the rs1568885and rs1813443 polymorphisms are associated with clinical and biochemical response to infliximab in Greek patients with Crohn’s disease.     

Gastro-intestinal toxicity of chemotherapeutics in colorectal cancer:The role of inflammation

Chemotherapy-induced diarrhea(CID)is a common and often severe side effect experienced by colorectal cancer(CRC)patients during their treatment.As chemotherapy regimens evolve to include more efficacious agents,CID is increasingly becoming a major cause of dose limiting toxicity and merits further investigation.Inflammation is a key factor behind gastrointestinal(GI)toxicity of chemotherapy.Different chemotherapeutic agents activate a diverse range of pro-inflammatory pathways culminating in distinct histopathological changes in the small intestine and colonic mucosa.Here we review the current understanding of the mechanisms behind GI toxicity and the mucositis associated with systemic treatment of CRC.Insights into the inflammatory response activated during this process gained from various models of GI toxicity are discussed.The inflammatory processes contributing to the GI toxicity of chemotherapeutic agents are increasingly being recognised as having an important role in the development of anti-tumor immunity,thus conferring added benefit against tumor recurrence and improving patient survival.We review the basic mechanisms involved in the promotion of immunogenic cell death and its relevance in the treatment of colorectal cancer.Finally,the impact of CID on patient outcomes and therapeutic strategies to prevent or minimise the effect of GI toxicity and mucositis are discussed.     

中国恶性肿瘤整合诊治指南-肛管癌部分

目的探讨肿瘤细胞减灭术（CRS）及腹腔热灌注化疗（HIPEC）联合肝切除治疗结直肠癌腹膜转移（CRPM）合并肝转移（LM）的安全性及有效性。 方法回顾性收集中国医学科学院肿瘤医院结直肠外科自2017年6月至2019年6月采用CRS+HIPEC联合肝切除治疗的16例CRPM合并孤立LM患者的临床病理资料。 结果男性6例，女性10例，中位年龄62岁。全组患者接受CRS+HIPEC联合同步肝切除，肝脏转移瘤均获得完整切除。中位总生存期25个月，中位无病生存期9个月。1年及3年总生存率分别为75.0%及37.0%，1年及3年无病生存率分别为50.0%及9.4%。6例（37.5%）出现轻度并发症（Clavien-Dindo Ⅰ~Ⅱ），4例（25.0%）出现严重并发症（Ⅲ~Ⅳ）。 结论CRPM合并孤立的、能完整切除的LM的患者接受CRS+HIPEC联合同期肝切除是安全可行的，同时可为患者带来一定生存获益。     

Korean guidelines for colorectal cancer screening and polyp detection

Colorectal cancer is the second most common cancer in males and the fourth most common in females in Korea. Since the most of colorectal cancer occur through the prolonged transformation of adenomas into carcinomas, early detection and removal of colorectal adenomas are one of the most effective methods to prevent colorectal cancer. Considering the increasing incidence of colorectal cancer and polyps in Korea, it is very important to establish Korean guideline for colorectal cancer screening and polyp detection. Korean Multi-Society Take Force developed the guidelines with evidence-based methods. Parts of the statements drawn by systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Herein we discussed the epidemiology of colorectal cancers and adenomas in Korea, optimal screening methods for colorectal cancer, and detection for adenomas including fecal occult blood tests, radiologic tests, and endoscopic examinations.     

Capecitabine as first-line treatment in colorectal cancer. Pooled data from two large, phase III trials

The oral, tumour-selective fluoropyrimidine capecitabine represents a major new strategy for the treatment of colorectal cancer. Pooled results from two large, multicentre, open-label, phase III studies comparing oral capecitabine (1250 mg/m2 twice daily for 14 days every 3 weeks) with the Mayo Clinic regimen (5-fluorouracil [5-FU] 425 mg/m2 plus leucovorin 20 mg/m2 days 1-5, every 4 weeks) provide information on over 1200 patients receiving first-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer. Analysis of all randomised patients demonstrated a significantly superior overall response rate as assessed by the investigator for capecitabine compared with 5-FU/leucovorin (25.7% versus 16.7%, P<0.0002), reinforcing the individual trial results. Median time to disease progression, overall survival and duration of response were equivalent in the two treatment groups. Furthermore, capecitabine showed a superior safety profile compared with 5-FU/leucovorin, with a significantly lower incidence (P<0.001) of diarrhoea, stomatitis, nausea and alopecia, together with a reduced treatment-related hospitalisation rate. In addition, the incidence of neutropenic fever/sepsis was significantly lower in patients receiving capecitabine.     

Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy with carmofur for colorectal cancer--a multi-institutional randomized controlled study

The efficacy and safety of preoperative chemotherapy with carmofur (HCFU) for colorectal cancer were evaluated in a randomized controlled study involving 63 institutes in the Kanto area. Patients aged 75 or younger with Dukes' B or C colorectal cancer were eligible if curative surgery was expected. In the end, 326 were eligible from 405 consecutive colorectal cancer patients. Patients in both the control (n = 162) and the new treatment group (n = 164) were given intravenous mitomycin C (MMC) 6 mg/m2 on day 0 and 7 after surgery and HCFU 300 mg/day orally from day 14 for a year. Patients in the new treatment group were also given oral HCFU for 14 days or more prior to surgery. All 326 patients were followed for 5 years or longer. Five-year overall and disease-free survival rates were not significantly different between the two groups (75.4% and 71.6% for the control, and 71.8% and 71.5% for the study group, respectively). In the subset analysis, neither cancer site nor nodal status affected the differences in overall- and disease-free survival rates between the groups. The present findings show no additional efficacy of preoperative chemotherapy with HCFU in survival from advanced colorectal cancer. Further investigations in terms of patient selection, treatment regimen, combined use of radiotherapy, and other factors would be required to determine the significance of preoperative chemotherapy against advanced colorectal cancer.     

A prospective randomised trial to study the role of levamisole and interferon alfa in an adjuvant therapy with 5-FU for stage III colon cancer

The purpose of this trial was to examine the efficacy of the addition of levamisole (LEV) or interferon alfa (IFN) to an adjuvant chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in patients with stage III colon cancer. According to a 2 x 2 factorial study design, 598 patients were randomly assigned to one of four adjuvant treatment arms. Patients in arm one received 5-FU weekly for 1 year, patients in arm two 5-FU plus LEV, in arm three 5-FU plus IFN and patients in arm four 5-FU, LEV and IFN. The relative risk of relapse and the relative risk of death were significantly higher for patients treated with LEV compared with those without LEV treatment (HR 1.452, 95% CI 1.135-1.856, P=0.0028; HR 1.506, 95% CI 1.150-1.973, P=0.0027, respectively). No significant impact on survival was observed for therapy with IFN in the univariate analysis. The addition of LEV to adjuvant 5-FU significantly worsened the prognosis of patients with stage III colon cancer. Interferon alfa had no significant influence on survival when combined with adjuvant 5-FU, but increased the toxicity of therapy substantially.