Tumescent local anesthesia for the surgical treatment of burns and postburn sequelae in pediatric patients

BACKGROUND: Tumescent local anesthesia is a technique for regional anesthesia of the skin and the subcutaneous tissue, using infiltration of large volumes of local anesthetic. The advantages of this technique are (1) simplicity, (2) prolonged postoperative analgesia, (3) low incidence of bleeding, and (4) anesthetization of a large area of the body. There are no reports on the use of tumescent local anesthesia in pediatric patients. METHODS: In 30 consecutive pediatric burn patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status class I or II who were 1-120 months old (34 +/- 31.6 months), after induction of anesthesia with nitrous oxide-oxygen-sevoflurane, infiltration with 0.05% (14 ml/kg) or 0.1% (7 ml/kg) lidocaine solution was performed. Anesthesia was maintained with patients spontaneously breathing with 1.5% sevoflurane in nitrous oxide-oxygen (50%). The maximum dose of lidocaine used was 7 mg/kg. Postoperative pain was assessed by using the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale (for patients aged up to 5 yr) and by using a visual analog scale (for patients older than 5 yr). A comparison with a historic control group not treated with the tumescent local anesthesia technique was performed. RESULTS: No patients were excluded from the study, and no significant variations in the monitored intraoperative parameters were observed. Five patients had an increase in heart rate and respiratory rate at the beginning of surgery, and of these, two needed a temporary increase in sevoflurane concentration. After the initial incision, no response to painful stimulus was observed. No complications occurred. Six patients required postoperative acetaminophen administration, and 24 patients did not require analgesic treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Tumescent local anesthesia with maximum dose of 7 mg/kg lidocaine seems to be safe and the sole possible effective locoregional anesthesia technique for the surgical treatment of noncontiguous pediatric burns.     

Introducing the Advanced Burn Life Support (ABLS) course in Italy

Systematic education based on internationally standardized programs is a well-established practice in Italy, especially in the emergency health care system. However, until recently, a specific program to treat burns was not available to guide emergency physicians, nurses, or volunteers acting as first responders. In 2010, two national faculty members, acting as ABA observers, and one Italian course coordinator, trained and certified in the United States, conducted a week-long training program which fully certified 10 Italian instructors. Authorized ABLS provider courses were conducted in Italy between 2010 and 2012, including one organized prior to the 20th annual meeting of the Italian Society of Burns (SIUst). In order to increase the effectiveness and diffusion of the course in Italy, changes were approved by the ABA to accommodate societal differences, including the translation of the manual into Italian. The ABA has also approved the creation and publication of a bilingual ABLS Italian website for the purpose of promoting the ABLS course in Italy. In response to high demand, a second ABLS Instructor course was organized in 2012 and has been attended by physicians and nurses from several Italian burn centers. In the following discourse the experiences of the first 15 Italian ABLS courses will be discussed.     

Plasma levels of lignocaine during tumescent local anaesthesia in children with burns

The aim of the study was to assess the changes in plasma lignocaine concentrations over time when the tumescent solution is injected into subcutaneous tissue of children undergoing surgical treatment of burns. Sixteen consecutive children with burns were studied using a prospective study design. After induction of general anesthesia, tumescent lignocaine solution 0.1% with adrenaline in nine patients (adrenaline group) for the treatment of postburn sequelae, or without adrenaline in seven patients (no-adrenaline group) for the treatment of acute burns, was injected into the subcutaneous tissue of burned and donor areas. The maximum dose of lignocaine was 7 mg/kg. Blood samples were collected before the start of the injection as well as at 5, 10, 20, 30, 45, 60, 90 minutes and 2, 4, 8, 12, 24 hours after the infiltration was completed. The course of lignocaine plasma levels was chaotic in the adrenaline group and biphasic during the first hour in the no-adrenaline group. The maximum plasma concentration of lignocaine was 2.09 microg/ml in the adrenaline group and 1.98 microg/ml in the no-adrenaline group. No adverse reactions were noted. Tumescent injection in burned children resulted in lignocaine plasma concentrations that were always lower than the often quoted value of 5 microg/ml, considered to be the toxic plasma threshold in adults. These data lend support to the use of lignocaine using the tumescent technique in burned paediatric patients.     

Tumescent Local Anesthesia for the Surgical Treatment of Burns and Postburn Sequelae in Pediatric Patients

Background: Tumescent local anesthesia is a technique for regional anesthesia of the skin and the subcutaneous tissue, using infiltration of large volumes of local anesthetic. The advantages of this technique are (1) simplicity, (2) prolonged postoperative analgesia, (3) low incidence of bleeding, and (4) anesthetization of a large area of the body. There are no reports on the use of tumescent local anesthesia in pediatric patients.

Methods: In 30 consecutive pediatric burn patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status class I or II who were 1-120 months old (34 +/- 31.6 months), after induction of anesthesia with nitrous oxide-oxygen-sevoflurane, infiltration with 0.05% (14 ml/kg) or 0.1% (7 ml/kg) lidocaine solution was performed. Anesthesia was maintained with patients spontaneously breathing with 1.5% sevoflurane in nitrous oxide-oxygen (50%). The maximum dose of lidocaine used was 7 mg/kg. Postoperative pain was assessed by using the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale (for patients aged up to 5 yr) and by using a visual analog scale (for patients older than 5 yr). A comparison with a historic control group not treated with the tumescent local anesthesia technique was performed.

Results: No patients were excluded from the study, and no significant variations in the monitored intraoperative parameters were observed. Five patients had an increase in heart rate and respiratory rate at the beginning of surgery, and of these, two needed a temporary increase in sevoflurane concentration. After the initial incision, no response to painful stimulus was observed. No complications occurred. Six patients required postoperative acetaminophen administration, and 24 patients did not require analgesic treatment.     

Incidence of vomiting in susceptible children under regional analgesia with two different anaesthetic techniques

BACKGROUND: Postoperative vomiting (POV) is a frequent side-effect of paediatric surgery and a leading cause of unplanned admission. Many antiemetic drugs have been studied, but less attention has been given to the effects on POV of the anaesthetic technique adopted. The aim of this study was to compare two different anaesthetic techniques in children under regional analgesia at risk for POV. METHODS: We studied 135 children suffering from motion sickness or with a previous history of POV. The patients were randomized to receive inhalation anaesthesia (group S) with sevoflurane by LMA or intravenous (i.v.) anaesthesia with ketamine and propofol (group P). All the patients were treated with an ilio-inguinal block after induction of anaesthesia. Postoperatively, the children were followed by the nursing staff and by their parents, none of whom were aware of the anaesthesia technique used. RESULTS: A significant decrease was observed in the incidence of early (0-6 h) and delayed (6-24 h) POV in those children who received i.v. sedation. There was no difference between the two groups in the level of analgesia either at the end of surgery or 2 h postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Anaesthesia based on propofol and ketamine is better than inhalation anaesthesia with sevoflurane by LMA for reducing POV in children at risk under an ilio-inguinal block. Tailoring the anaesthetic to the specific needs of children susceptible to POV should be considered before resorting to the routine use of expensive antiemetic prophylaxis.     

The use of the cuffed oropharyngeal airway in paediatric patients

BACKGROUND: The cuffed oropharyngeal airway (COPA) is a device which has already been demonstrated to be suitable for anaesthetized adult patients undergoing either spontaneous or mechanical ventilation. There are few reports on the use of the COPA in children. In this study, the authors assessed the COPA in paediatric patients undergoing minor surgery. METHODS: The same anaesthesiologist inserted the COPA in 40 consecutive paediatric patients, ASA I and II, aged 1.8-15.3 years. (7.4 +/- 3.9), after induction of anaesthesia with N2O/O2/sevoflurane. COPA size was chosen by measuring the distal tip of the device at the angle of the jaw with the COPA perpendicular to the patient's bed. The proper positioning of the COPA was assessed by observing thoracoabdominal movements, regular capnograph trace, the reservoir bag movements and SpO2 > 94% with a fraction of inspired oxygen of 0.5. Anaesthesia was maintained with 1 MAC halothane, sevoflurane, or isoflurane in N2O/O2 (50%) and the patients were spontaneously breathing. The stability of the COPA following changes in head, neck and body position was tested. We recorded the duration time for COPA insertion, the side-effects of placement of the COPA and during the intraoperative period, the number of attempts, the type of manipulation in order to provide an effective airway and postoperative symptoms, such as the presence of blood on the device, sore throat, neckache, jaw pain and PONV. RESULTS: Successful COPA insertion at the first attempt was 90% and at the second attempt in the remaining 10%. The most frequent airway manipulations were head tilt in 27.5% (obtained by a pillow under shoulders) and chin lift in 5%. No complications both at COPA placement nor during the intraoperative period were observed. On the basis of weight and age, the COPA size was no. 8 in 50%, no. 9 in 30%, no. 10 in 12.5%, and no. 11 in 7.5%. The COPA demonstrated stability after changes in head, neck and body position. Postoperative complications were the presence of blood stains in one case and PONV in six cases (15%). CONCLUSIONS: The COPA is an extratracheal airway device suitable in paediatric patients undergoing general anaesthesia with spontaneous ventilation for minor surgery and other painful procedures. This study shows that for paediatric patients: (i) complications seem to be rare; (ii) the COPA allows hands free anaesthesia; (iii) specific indication for the COPA could be obese patients with a small mouth; and (iv) COPA sizing can be easily established by the weight or age of the patients.