Issues and challenges in staging of pressure ulcers.

Wound assessment is a key element of effective wound care, and assessment of pressure ulcers includes accurate determination of wound stage. Although the original staging system established by Shea was based on his understanding of the pathology involved in pressure ulcer development, subsequent staging systems (and the one currently in use) were intended simply to establish the level of tissue damage. Recently, clinicians have drawn attention to numerous limitations associated with the current staging system, including the inability to differentiate between an inflammatory response involving intact skin and a deep tissue injury (deep bruising) underneath intact skin. This is a clinically significant difference because clinicians have noted that most inflammatory responses resolve with intervention, whereas most areas of deep tissue injury progress to full-thickness ulcers even when appropriate intervention is provided. A second area of controversy involves partial-thickness (Stage 2) lesions; because many of these lesions are caused by maceration and/or friction (as opposed to pressure) clinicians are frequently unclear regarding which of these lesions should be staged. In response to these concerns, the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel convened a consensus forum and published white papers to clearly outline the issues; they solicited clinician feedback on the white papers and the Wound, Ostomy, Continence Nurses Society provided a written response. This article summarizes the key points of the white papers, WOCN Society response, and consensus forum discussion.     

Indwelling Versus Intermittent Feeding Tubes in Premature Neonates

Objective: To determine the effect of indwelling versus intermittent feeding tube placement on weight gain, apnea, and bradycardia in premature neonates.
Design: Eligible subjects were assigned randomly to either feeding tube method. Each subject was followed for 6 days.
Setting: The study was conducted in a secondary level neonatal intensive-care unit (NICU), a tertiary level NICU in a perinatal center, and a tertiary level NICU in a referral center.
Patients/Participants: Neonates who were 24–34 weeks gestational age, developmentally appropriate for gestational age, medically stable, on full enteral feedings through an orogastric or a nasogastric tube, and not fluid restricted. Ninety-three neonates were enrolled-49 in the indwelling group and 44 in the intermittent group. Nine neonates did not complete the study.
Interventions: Nasogastric indwelling feeding tubes were placed and left in site for up to 3 days. Orogastric intermittent feeding tubes were placed for each feeding and removed at completion of the feeding.
Main outcome measures: Weight gain, apnea, and bradycardia. Results: Members of both groups had similar demographic characteristics, clinical problems, and nutritional intake. No statistical differences were found between the two groups in weight gain or episodes of apnea and bradycardia.
Conclusions: There were no statistically or clinically significant differences between the two groups. The intermittent method of feeding is more expensive. Because no clinical differences were found, the type of tube placement chosen for feeding the premature infant may be based on economics.     

Use of somatosensory evoked potentials to detect peripheral ischemia and potential injury resulting from positioning of the surgical patient: case reports and discussion.

BACKGROUND: Somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) have long been recognized as an excellent tool for detecting neural and vascular compromise during vascular, neurosurgical and orthopedic procedures. SSEPs have the ability to localize, central versus peripheral, the area of compromise. Many surgeons use only lower-limb SSEP monitoring when performing lumbar spinal surgery. The upper extremities are usually not monitored during such procedures, and monitoring oxygen saturation does not detect neural compromise. PURPOSE: To report that the expanded use of SSEP monitoring during surgery can be beneficial in detecting peripheral ischemia or neural compromise resulting from positioning. STUDY DESIGN: Three case reviews of orthopedic spine surgeries where SSEP monitoring provided early warnings of vascular and neural compression. METHODS: The cases review three different lumbar procedures in which evidence of peripheral ischemia and nerve compression were detected by SSEP monitoring. RESULTS: By the use of upper- and lower-extremity monitoring during lumbar procedures, early detection of ischemia and nerve compression were noted intraoperatively. These changes prompted examination of the patient and repositioning to correct the ischemia or compression. The repositioning in these cases corrected the problem, and no lasting effects were found. CONCLUSIONS: Including SSEP monitoring of the bilateral upper extremities should be considered during lumbar spinal procedures. Such monitoring can be offered for a slightly increased expense and only minimal time delay to place the additional required electrodes by the technician. As a direct result of the early warning of the SSEP monitoring, we were able to avoid potential ischemic injuries and improve patient outcomes.     

Characterization of the Medical Symptom Validity Test in evaluation of clinically referred memory disorders clinic patients.

We prospectively evaluated performance of 63 referrals to a memory disorders clinic who received the Medical Symptom Validity Test (MSVT) as part of their standard neuropsychological evaluation. The patients were grouped based on independent medical diagnoses and presence or absence of a potential financial incentive to under-perform. Twenty-seven patients (42.9%) scored below cutoffs on the MSVT symptom validity indices. Two individuals in the potential financial incentive group showed clear signs of invalid responding (18.2%). Twenty-two of the remaining 25 patients who failed the symptom validity indices corresponded to the dementia profile. Three individuals did not correspond to the dementia profile but are thought to have performed validly representing a 4.8% false positive rate. When considering all MSVT indices, the base rate of invalid responding in the potential financial incentive to under-perform group increased to 27.3%. Combining all groups our base rate of invalid responding was 4.8%. Specific performances are presented.     

The cost-effectiveness of chemoprophylaxis with Maloprim administered by primary health care workers in preventing death from malaria amongst rural Gambian children aged less than five years old.

In recent trials in The Gambia, mass chemoprophylaxis with Maloprim administered over several years by primary health care workers to children aged 3-59 months has reduced both mortality and morbidity without inducing impairment of natural immunity or significant development of drug resistance. Taking expenditure of both time and money, by both public authorities and village volunteers, into account, the costs and the cost effectiveness of such mass chemoprophylaxis are estimated here. The cost per child protected per season was (1990 US) $2.84; the cost per childhood death averted was $143. Both costs compare favourably with those of permethrin bed net impregnation. So in some circumstances where malaria is holoendemic, control of childhood malaria by chemoprophylaxis may be more economically efficient than provision of impregnated bed nets.     

Use of simple clinical signs to predict pneumonia in young Gambian children: the influence of malnutrition.

The current WHO recommendations for the case management of acute respiratory infections (ARI) in children aged 2 months to 5 years in developing countries use fast breathing (respiratory rate of > or = 50 per minute in children under 12 months and > or = 40 in children aged 12 months to 5 years) and lower chest wall indrawing to determine which child is likely to have pneumonia and should therefore receive antibiotics. We have evaluated these and other physical signs in 487 malnourished children and 255 well nourished children who presented with a cough or breathing difficulty. Pneumonia, defined as definite radiological pneumonia or probable radiological pneumonia associated with crackles on auscultation, was present in 145 (30%) of the malnourished children and 68 (26%) of the well nourished children. The respiratory rate predicted pneumonia equally well in the two groups, but to achieve an appropriate sensitivity and specificity the respiratory rate cut-off required in malnourished children was approximately 5 breaths per minute less than that in well nourished children. Intercostal indrawing was more common and lower chest wall indrawing was less common in the malnourished children, with or without pneumonia. These results suggest that fast breathing, as defined at present by WHO, and lower chest wall indrawing are not sufficiently sensistive as predictors of pneumonia in malnourished children. As the latter are a high-risk group, we should like to recommend that children with malnutrition who present with a cough, fast breathing or difficult breathing should be treated with antibiotics.