The Effectiveness of Video Technology As an Adjunct to Teach and Evaluate Epidural Anesthesia Performance Skills

Background: Although video review has been used in teaching, it has not been reported for use as an adjunct to teaching anesthesiology residents. The purpose of the prospective, randomized, blinded study was to determine whether teaching with video review improves epidural anesthesia skills of anesthesiology residents.

Methods: Twenty-two second-year (CA-2) anesthesiology residents beginning their first obstetric anesthesia rotation were assigned to video or nonvideo groups. All residents were filmed daily as they placed epidural analgesia. Residents assigned to the video group reviewed their tapes twice a week with an attending anesthesiologist, whereas residents assigned to the nonvideo group never saw their films. Four experienced attending anesthesiologists independently judged videotapes taken on days 1, 15, and 30 and scored the residents for "overall" skill (range of summed overall grades, 0-40), as well as on 13 predetermined criteria.

Results: As determined by kappa coefficients, interrater reliability was high among the judges (k = 0.7-0.8). Residents in the video group improved to a greater degree than residents in the nonvideo group. On day 1, the median overall grades for the video and nonvideo groups were 21 and 12, respectively. By day 15, the corresponding grades had increased to 32 and 24, respectively (P < 0.01). However, overall median grades continued to improve between days 15 and 30 in the video group only (P < 0.01).     

Neurocysticercosis: a new differential in the diagnosis of postdural puncture headache

IMPLICATIONS: Positional headache after spinal anesthesia is considered pathognomonic for postdural puncture headache. This report describes a patient who developed a positional headache after spinal anesthesia that was due to neurocysticercosis, a parasitic central nervous system infestation caused by the tapeworm Taenia solium.     

Use of atraumatic spinal needles among neurologists in the United States

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate atraumatic spinal needle use among US neurologists. BACKGROUND: Postdural puncture headache following lumbar puncture may be dramatically reduced through the use of atraumatic pencil-point spinal needles. It was hypothesized that atraumatic spinal needles are rarely used by members of specialties outside of anesthesiology. To determine the extent to which atraumatic spinal needles are currently being used for lumbar puncture in the United States, American neurologists (one group of physicians who regularly perform lumbar punctures) were surveyed. METHODS: A questionnaire was mailed to all 7798 members of the American Academy of Neurology listed in the membership directory. The questionnaire included items pertaining to age, practice setting, knowledge of pencil-point (atraumatic) spinal needles, and lumbar puncture practices. RESULTS: Only a fraction (2%) of the neurologists surveyed routinely use atraumatic spinal needles. Almost half of the responding neurologists reported having no knowledge of pencil-point spinal needles. Among those who did have knowledge of these new spinal needles, the most common reasons given for not using them were nonavailability and expense. CONCLUSIONS: Atraumatic spinal needles for lumbar puncture have been shown to dramatically decrease the risk of postdural puncture headache. Although the use of these needles is standard practice among anesthesiologists, they have not been adopted by other medical specialties. This may lead to unnecessary morbidity among patients undergoing lumbar puncture.