Preoperative percutaneous drainage of diverticular abscesses

To define the role of percutaneous catheter drainage in the initial management of diverticular abscess, we reviewed 19 patients who were followed for an average of 17.4 months after drainage. All patients had large paracolic or pelvic abscesses with a mean size of 8.9 cm. There were no complications related to catheter placement, and 15 patients (79 percent) required drainage for less than 3 weeks. Sepsis resolved rapidly, and only two patients (11 percent) had persistent fever or leukocytosis beyond the third day of drainage. Routine sinography revealed fistulous communications to the colon in nine patients (47 percent), but only three (16 percent) had grossly feculent drainage. Fourteen patients (74 percent) completed the treatment plan of preoperative catheter drainage followed by single-stage sigmoid colectomy and primary anastomosis without complications. Two patients refused operation, one of whom died 16 days postoperatively from recurrent sepsis and end-stage pulmonary disease. The three patients with fecal fistulas all had inadequate control of infection, suggesting the need for early operation and fecal diversion in such cases. We conclude that preoperative percutaneous catheter drainage obviates the need for colostomy and multiple-stage surgery in approximately three-fourths of patients with large diverticular abscesses.     

Percutaneous drainage of complicated abscesses and fluid collections

The original concept of percutaneous, radiological abscess drainage was confined to well circumscribed, solitary abscesses, that could be reached by a short access avoiding transgression of uninvolved organs or compartments. With increasing experience criteria for percutaneous abscess drainage have been expanded to radiological treatment of pancreatic, periappendiceal, diverticular, interloop and mediastinal abscesses and fluid collections. The authors present their experience with percutaneous treatment of such "complicated" abscesses in 140 patients.     

Volume and impact of second-opinion consultations by radiologists at a tertiary care cancer center: data

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Patients with cancer who are referred to a dedicated oncology center usually have undergone previous imaging studies that the oncologists typically desire to have reviewed by radiologists. Such reinterpretations can be complex and time-consuming, yet many institutions do not systematically account for them as part of the total workload. The purpose of this study was to ascertain the numbers and types of second-opinion consultations performed by radiologists at a tertiary care cancer center, and to assess their effect on work volume. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A survey of referring clinicians was undertaken to evaluate the numbers and types of second-opinion consultations requested of radiologists at the Dana Farber Cancer Institute during a 12-month period. Consultations included review of studies from outside institutions, and cases from Dana Farber in which further comparison was needed. The number of consultations requiring additional tumor size measurements was tallied. The mean daily number of new studies interpreted by radiologists was used as a benchmark of work volume. RESULTS: Radiologists performed 4,664 consultations during 254 workdays, interpreting a mean of 18 additional studies (range, 4-42) per day as a result of referrals for second opinion. These included 3,638 (78%) cross-sectional studies (ie, computed tomographic [CT], magnetic resonance [MR], and ultrasound [US] studies), 674 (14%) mammograms, 220 (5%) plain radiographs, 132 (3%) nuclear medicine scans, and one galactogram. Of the 4,664 consultations, 1,306 (28%) were performed to obtain tumor measurements, many of these involving five to 10 bidimensional calculations per study. A mean of 101 new examinations per day was performed by radiologists during the same 12-month period, including cross-sectional studies (CT and US scans) (56%), plain radiographs (34%), and mammograms (11%). MR imaging was not performed. CONCLUSION: Second-opinion consultations increased the average daily work volume by 18%. This has implications for workforce, as well as for compensation in terms of relative value units and finances for this previously unquantified service.     

Tissue core biopsy of abdominal tumors with a 22 gauge cutting needle

Percutaneous needle sampling of malignant tumors carried out by fine-needle cytologic aspiration and large-needle cutting techniques both possess certain limitations. A fine caliber 22 gauge cutting needle and a modified sampling technique used in 78 patients with suspected abdominal neoplasms are described. Both cytologic and histologic samples were sought in each case and overall successful diagnoses were made in 88% of 50 proved cases, with specific histologic diagnoses in 56%. Cytologic specimens were more sensitive in 14 cases in the detection of malignancy, while histologic results were more specific in nine cases. No significant complications were encountered. This modified method has not replaced the former cytologic aspiration technique in this institution.     

Practice patterns of nonvascular interventional radiology procedures at academic centers in the United States?

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To determine and analyze the patterns of practice of nonvascular interventional procedures in academic centers in the United States. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A survey was administered via e-mail to the chief residents of 112 academic radiology departments in the United States. Recipients of the survey were asked to identify which sections within their respective radiology departments performed each of 43 types of nonvascular interventional procedures. An additional entry for performance of procedures by non-radiologists was provided. A total of 66 (59%) recipients responded. The statistical method used was the analysis of contingency tables. RESULTS: Percutaneous abdominal biopsies are performed mainly by abdominal and body imaging sections (43/66, 65%), followed by vascular/interventional sections (21/66, 32%). Percutaneous abdominal drainages are performed mostly by abdominal, body imaging, and computed tomography sections (40/66, 61%), followed by vascular/interventional sections. Fluoroscopically guided procedures were performed most commonly by vascular/interventional sections, including percutaneous gastrostomy (40/66, 61%), percutaneous nephrostomy (42/66, 64%), and biliary interventions such as percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (47/66, 71%). Breast and musculoskeletal procedures are performed by their respective sections most frequently. Non-radiologists perform a significant portion of certain types of procedures: paracenteses, thoracenteses, biliary interventions (particularly stone extractions), enterostomies (particularly percutaneous jejunostomies and cecostomies), and certain biopsies (kidney and prostate). CONCLUSIONS: Academic US radiology sections perform nonvascular interventional radiology procedures in a complex and nonuniform manner. The vascular/interventional sections and organ system and modality (especially CT) sections perform the bulk of the procedures included in the survey. Breast imaging sections predominate in procedures in their disciplines. A substantial number and amount of interventional radiology procedures are performed by non-radiologists.     

Biliary pressure: manometric and perfusion studies at percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography and percutaneous biliary drainage

Manometric pressure recordings were attempted during percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC) and after percutaneous biliary drainage (PBD) in 203 cases. Successful readings were achieved at PTC in 85% (104/122) of patients. Pressure measurements were also obtained through 56 biliary drainage catheters, and controlled perfusion challenges were performed in 12 patients (on 18 occasions). Documentation of the occasionally poor correlation between the caliber of ducts and the degree of obstruction (i.e., pressure) was shown, and it was suggested that very high pressures may be predictive of a bile leak after PTC. Adequacy of percutaneous drainage and stricture dilatation were further assessed with these manometric techniques. Pressure and perfusion data aided in detecting and determining the significance of the nondilated obstructed duct, the dilated nonobstructed ductal system, and subtle distal ductal strictures. The knowledge obtained from percutaneous pressure recordings may help to determine appropriate therapy.     

Imaging and Percutaneous Management of Acute Complicated Pancreatitis

Acute pancreatitis varies from a mild, self-limited disease to one with significant morbidity and mortality in its most severe forms. While clinical criteria abound, imaging has become indispensable to diagnose the extent of the disease and its complications, as well as to guide and monitor therapy. Percutaneous interventional techniques offer options that can be life-saving, surgery-sparing or important adjuncts to operation. Close cooperation and communication between the surgeon, gastroenterologist and interventional radiologist enhance the likelihood of successful patient care.     

Percutaneous drainage access: a simplified coaxial technique

We describe an access technique that we have used in 150 nephrostomy and biliary drainage procedures and for access to some abscesses and viscera. The system provides safe coaxial access with a 22-gauge removable hub needle, which then acts as a guide wire and is replaced by an 18-gauge cannula. A major advantage is that only one guide wire is used (0.038-inch) for the entire drainage procedure. No significant complications have occurred to date with this method.