Inter-laboratory study on standardized MPS libraries: evaluation of performance,concordance, and sensitivity using mixtures and degraded DNA

International Journal of Legal Medicine - We present results from an inter-laboratory massively parallel sequencing (MPS) study in the framework of the SeqForSTRs project to evaluate forensically...     

A multiplex (m)RNA-profiling system for the forensic identification of body fluids and contact traces

In current forensic practice, information about the possible biological origin of forensic traces is mostly determined using protein-based presumptive testing. Recently, messenger RNA-profiling has emerged as an alternative strategy to examine the biological origin. Here we describe the development of a single multiplex mRNA-based system for the discrimination of the most common forensic body fluids as well as skin cells. A DNA/RNA co-isolation protocol was established that results in DNA yields equivalent to our standard in-house validated DNA extraction procedure which uses silica-based columns. An endpoint RT-PCR assay was developed that simultaneously amplifies 19 (m)RNA markers. This multiplex assay analyses three housekeeping, three blood, two saliva, two semen, two menstrual secretion, two vaginal mucosa, three general mucosa and two skin markers. The assay has good sensitivity as full RNA profiles for blood, semen and saliva were obtained when using ≥0.05 μL body fluid starting material whereas full DNA profiles were obtained with ≥0.1 μL. We investigated the specificity of the markers by analysing 15 different sets of each type of body fluid and skin with each set consisting of 8 individuals. Since skin markers have not been incorporated in multiplex endpoint PCR assays previously, we analysed these markers in more detail. Interestingly, both skin markers gave a positive result in samplings of the hands, feet, back and lips but negative in tongue samplings. Positive identification (regarding both DNA- and RNA-profiling) was obtained for specimens stored for many years, e.g. blood (28 years-old), semen (28 years-old), saliva (6 years-old), skin (10 years-old) and menstrual secretion (4 years-old). The described approach of combined DNA- and RNA-profiling of body fluids and contact traces assists in the interpretation of forensic stains by providing information about not only the donor(s) that contributed to the stain but also by indicating which cell types are present.     

A protocol for direct and rapid multiplex PCR amplification on forensically relevant samples

Forensic DNA typing involves a multi-step workflow. Steps include DNA isolation, quantification, amplification of a set of short tandem repeat (STR) markers, separation of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) products by capillary electrophoresis (CE) and DNA profile analysis and interpretation. With that, the process takes around 10–12 h. For several scenarios it may be very valuable to speed up this process and obtain an interpretable DNA profile, suited to search a DNA database, within a few hours. For instance in cases of national security, abduction with danger of life, risk of repetition by a serial perpetrator or when custody time of suspects is limited. By a direct and rapid PCR approach we reduced the total DNA profiling time to 2–3 h after which genotyping information for the 10 STR markers plus the amelogenin (AMEL) marker present in the commercially available AmpF?STR^® SGM Plus? (SGM+) profiling kit is obtained. This reduction in time is achieved by using the following elements: (1) the inhibitor tolerant, highly processive Phusion^® Flash DNA polymerase; (2) a modified, non-adenylated allelic ladder; (3) the quick PIKO^® thermal cycler system with ultra-thin walled reaction tubes; (4) profile interpretation guidelines with an increased allele calling threshold, modified stutter ratios and marked low-level artefact peaks and (5) regulation of sample input by the use of mini-tapes that lift a limited amount of cell material from swabs or fabrics. The procedure is specifically effective for high level DNA, single source samples such as samples containing saliva, blood, semen and hair roots. Success rates, defined as a complete DNA profile, depend on stain type and surface. Due to the use of tape lifting as the sampling technique, the swab or fabric remains dry and intact and can be analyzed at a later stage using regular procedures. Validation experiments were performed which showed that the protocol effectively instructs researchers unfamiliar with the procedure. We have incorporated direct and rapid PCR in a “DNA-6 h” service that can assist police investigations by rapidly deriving DNA information from trace evidence left by a perpetrator, searching the STR profile against a DNA database and reporting the outcomes to police or prosecution.     

Extended PCR conditions to reduce drop-out frequencies in low template STR typing including unequal mixtures

Forensic laboratories employ various approaches to obtain short tandem repeat (STR) profiles from minimal traces (<100 pg DNA input). Most approaches aim to sensitize DNA profiling by increasing the amplification level by a higher cycle number or enlarging the amount of PCR products analyzed during capillary electrophoresis. These methods have limitations when unequal mixtures are genotyped, since the major component will be over-amplified or over-loaded. This study explores an alternative strategy for improved detection of the minor components in low template (LT) DNA typing that may be better suited for the detection of the minor component in mixtures. The strategy increases the PCR amplification efficiency by extending the primer annealing time several folds. When the AmpF?STR(?) Identifiler(?) amplification parameters are changed to an annealing time of 20 min during all 28 cycles, the drop-out frequency is reduced for both pristine DNA and single or multiple donor mock case work samples. In addition, increased peak heights and slightly more drop-ins are observed while the heterozygous peak balance remains similar as with the conventional Identifiler protocol. By this extended protocol, full DNA profiles were obtained from only 12 sperm heads (which corresponds to 36 pg of DNA) that were collected by laser micro dissection. Notwithstanding the improved detection, allele drop-outs do persist, albeit in lower frequencies. Thus a LT interpretation strategy such as deducing consensus profiles from multiple independent amplifications is appropriate. The use of extended PCR conditions represents a general approach to improve detection of unequal mixtures as shown using four commercially available kits (AmpF?STR(?) Identifiler, SEfiler Plus, NGM and Yfiler). The extended PCR protocol seems to amplify more of the molecules in LT samples during PCR, which results in a lower drop-out frequency.     

Assessment of mock cases involving complex low template DNA mixtures: A descriptive study

Complex DNA mixtures with low template (LT) components provide the most challenging cases to interpret and report. In this study, we designed such mixtures and we describe how reporting officers (ROs) at the Netherlands Forensic Institute (NFI) assess these when embedded in a mock case setting. DNA mixtures containing LT DNA from two to four contributors, sporadic contamination (mimicked by adding 6 pg of DNA, which represents once cell equivalent) and/or DNA of relatives (brothers), were amplified four-fold using the AmpFlSTR^® NGM? PCR Amplification Kit. Consensus profiles were then generated which included the alleles detected in at least half of the replicates. Four mock cases were created by including reference profiles of a hypothetical victim and suspect. The mock cases were assessed by eight ROs following the stepwise interpretation approach currently in use at the NFI. With this approach, the results of the comparisons between the DNA profiles of the evidentiary trace and the reference profiles are classified into four categories of evidential value [1]. The interpretations by the ROs were compared to the likelihood ratios (LRs) obtained from a probabilistic model that allows a calculation of LRs to assist the interpretation of LT DNA evidence and both were compared to the true composition of the designed mixtures.     

RNA/DNA co-analysis from blood stains--results of a second collaborative EDNAP exercise

A second collaborative exercise on RNA/DNA co-analysis for body fluid identification and STR profiling was organized by the European DNA Profiling Group (EDNAP). Six human blood stains, two blood dilution series (5-0.001 μl blood) and, optionally, bona fide or mock casework samples of human or non-human origin were analyzed by the participating laboratories using a RNA/DNA co-extraction or solely RNA extraction method. Two novel mRNA multiplexes were used for the identification of blood: a highly sensitive duplex (HBA, HBB) and a moderately sensitive pentaplex (ALAS2, CD3G, ANK1, SPTB and PBGD). The laboratories used different chemistries and instrumentation. All of the 18 participating laboratories were able to successfully isolate and detect mRNA in dried blood stains. Thirteen laboratories simultaneously extracted RNA and DNA from individual stains and were able to utilize mRNA profiling to confirm the presence of blood and to obtain autosomal STR profiles from the blood stain donors. The positive identification of blood and good quality DNA profiles were also obtained from old and compromised casework samples. The method proved to be reproducible and sensitive using different analysis strategies. The results of this collaborative exercise involving a RNA/DNA co-extraction strategy support the potential use of an mRNA based system for the identification of blood in forensic casework that is compatible with current DNA analysis methodology.     

Comparison of genotyping and weight of evidence results when applying different genotyping strategies on samples from a DNA transfer experiment

International Journal of Legal Medicine - In this study, we assessed to what extent data on the subject of TPPR (transfer, persistence, prevalence, recovery) that are obtained through an older STR...     

Assessment of the stochastic threshold,back- and forward stutter filters and low template techniques for NGM

The AmpFlSTR^® NGM? kit shows an increased sensitivity compared to previous AmpFlSTR^® kits, and the addition of a 29th PCR cycle was found to be the major cause for this. During in-house validation, we evaluated whether the increased sensitivity requires elevation of the stochastic threshold (below which alleles are prone to drop out due to low template amplification effects). To determine the stochastic threshold, over 500 false homozygotes were examined and the threshold was set at the rfu value where 99% of the alleles had a peak height below this value. Using 2085 Dutch reference samples, locus-specific stutter ratios were empirically determined and compared with the ones provided by Applied Biosystems. Application of sharp stutter filters is especially important for the analysis of unequal mixtures. To prevent allele calling of 99% of the ?1 repeat unit stutters, thirteen stutter ratio filters could be lowered by up to 1.79% and for two loci the stutter ratio filters had to be elevated slightly with a maximum of 0.06%. At all loci +1 repeat stutters were visible for the higher DNA inputs and for lower inputs at the tri-nucleotide repeat locus D22S1045 as well. The overall +1 stutter ratio filter was set to 2.50% and for D22S1045 it was determined to be 7.27%. To find the optimal strategy to sensitise genotyping for low template DNA samples, a comparison was made between enhancing the capillary electrophoresis settings (9 kV for 10 s) and increasing the number of PCR cycles (29 + 5 cycles).     

Comparison of stubbing and the double swab method for collecting offender epithelial material from a victim's skin

After manual strangulation, epithelial cells originating from the offender can often be found on the skin of the victim. In order to obtain a conclusive DNA profile, it is important to secure as many epithelial cells from the offender and as few epithelial cells from the victim as possible. In this study, two methods for securing offender DNA were compared: the double swab method and an adapted tape-lifting method, so-called stubbing. 50 male volunteers were asked to simulate manual strangulation on the forearm of a female volunteer. After securing the epithelial material, DNA profiles were generated. The contribution of both donors to the samples was determined from the number of detected alleles, specific for each donor, and the average peak height of the donor-specific alleles. For the offender, in all cases except one, partial or full profiles were obtained and no difference between the double swab and the stubbing method was observed. For the victim, fewer alleles were detected by means of double swab than by means of stubbing. In conclusion, the double swab method performs slightly better than the stubbing method. However, from a practical point of view, the stubbing method may be preferred over the double swab technique.