Assessment of carbohydrate tolerance in pregnancy

A review is given of the various methods of assessing carbohydrate tolerance in pregnancy. Oral glucose tolerance screening and diagnostic tests have been in use for more than 25 years. They are easily administered, relatively inexpensive, and present reasonable sensitivity; therefore, they continue to be used quite extensively. However, lack of reproducibility of the results and side effects such as nausea, vomiting, and headache have led to the use of alternate methods including glucose polymer (Polycose) and standard breakfast meals. These methods have been reported to present satisfactory results in clinical practice. Glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and fructosamine assays are also alternate forms of testing carbohydrate metabolism HbA1c measurement have been proven insensitive as a screening test for gestational diabetes, while their use as an index of overall glucose control remains valuable. The role of fructosamine in the assessment of carbohydrate intolerance remains controversial with conflicting claims made by various investigators regarding its sensitivity in detecting gestational diabetes and its response to alterations in glycemic control. In this review, the relative advantages and disadvantages of each glucose tolerance test are discussed and recommendations are given regarding their utility in pregnancy.     

Challenging the world: patient safety and health care-associated infection.

Improving the safety of patient care is an issue which affects health systems in both developed and developing countries. To co-ordinate and accelerate improvements in patient safety, the World Health Organization (WHO) has supported the creation of the World Alliance for Patient Safety which was launched in October 2004. The six action areas of the Alliance are Patients for Patient Safety, Taxonomy, Research, Solutions for Patient Safety, Reporting and Learning, and a biennial Global Patient Safety Challenge. The first Challenge covering 2005-2006 was launched in October 2005 under the banner 'Clean Care is Safer Care'. The Challenge addresses health care-associated infection, a major, patient safety problem affecting hundreds of millions of people worldwide.     

Quantitative thallium-201 scintigraphy after dipyridamole infusion combined with low level exercise in healthy volunteers

To establish test specific normal limits for quantitative analysis of uptake and washout of ²⁰¹Tl after dipyridamole infusion combined with low level exercise, 20 healthy volunteers were studied with low likelihood of coronary artery disease (CAD) assessed by a stepwise probability analysis based on age, sex, symptoms, resting electrocardiogram, and exercise electrocardiography. Likelihood of CAD in these volunteers was calculated as 1%. After dipyridamole infusion combined with low level exercise, one volunteer complained of headache; no other side effects were observed. There were no chest pain complaints. Maximal hemodynamic changes were achieved during the 6th and 7th min of the test. No ST segment depression was recorded. Visual analysis of the ²⁰¹Tl scintigrams was normal in all volunteers. Mean regional washout at 4 h was 44.37%±2.11%. The regional washout in the 70° LAO view (46.65%±1.10%) was significantly higher than in the anterior and 30° LAO views (43.44%±1.50% and 43.02%±1.45%, respectively). Profiles of uptake and washout of ²⁰¹Tl were different after dipyridamole infusion combined with low level exercise as compared to maximal exercise. Thus, in quantitative analysis of ²⁰¹Tl scintigraphy after dipyridamole infusion in conjunction with low level exercise as applied in the present study, it is mandatory to use normal limits of uptake and washout of ²⁰¹Tl derived from healthy volunteers who underwent the same combined protocol.