Intraoperative HDR brachytherapy for rectal cancer using a flexible intraoperative template: standard plans versus individual planning.

HDR intraoperative brachytherapy (IOBT) is applied to locally advanced rectal tumors using a 5 mm thick flexible intraoperative template (FIT). To reduce the procedure time, treatment planning is performed using standard plans that neglect the curvature of the FIT. We have calculated the individual treatment plan, based on the real geometry of the FIT, and the dose at clips placed during surgery. A mean treatment dose of 9.55+/-0.21 Gy was found for the individual plan, compared to the prescribed 10 Gy (P<0.0001) The mean central dose was 10.03+/-0.10 Gy in the standard plan and 9.20+/-0.32 Gy in the individual plan (P<0.0001) The mean dose at the corners of the FIT was 10.3 Gy in the standard plan and ranged between 10.3 and 10.5 Gy in the individual plan. In 63% of the clips, the dose was larger than 15.0 Gy, which is equivalent to a gap between the FIT and the target smaller than 5 mm. In 18% of the clips, the dose was smaller than 13.0 Gy indicating that locally the gap was larger than 5 mm. Clinical practice will have to prove if these small dose deviations influence the clinical outcome.     

Dysphagia disorders in patients with cancer of the oropharynx are significantly affected by the radiation therapy dose to the superior and middle constrictor muscle: a dose-effect relationship.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE: To assess the relationship between the radiation therapy (RT) dose received by the muscular components of the swallowing (sw) apparatus and - dysphagia related - quality of life (QoL) in oropharyngeal cancer. MATERIALS/METHODS: Between 2000 and 2005, 81 patients with SCC of the oropharynx were treated by 3DCRT or IMRT, with or without concomitant chemotherapy (CHT); 43 out of these 81 patients were boosted by brachytherapy (BT). Charts of 81 patients were reviewed with regard to late dysphagia complaints; 23% experienced severe dysphagia. Seventeen patients expired. Fifty-six out of 64 (88%) responded to quality of life (QoL) questionnaires; that is, the Performance Status Scales of List, EORTC H&N35, and the M.D. Anderson Dysphagia Inventory. The superior (scm), middle (mcm), and inferior constrictor muscle (icm), the cricopharyngeus muscle and the inlet of the esophagus, are considered of paramount importance for swallowing. The mean dose was calculated in the muscular structures. Univariate analysis and multivariate analysis were performed using the proportional odds model. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 18 months (range 2-34) for IMRT, and 46 months for 3DCRT (range 2-72). At 3-years, a LRC of 84%, DFS of 78% and OS of 77% were observed. A significant correlation was observed between the mean dose in the scm and mcm, and severe dysphagia complaints (univariate analysis). A steep dose-effect relationship, with an increase of the probability of dysphagia of 19% with every additional 10 Gy, was established. In the multivariate analysis, BT (dose) was the only significant factor. CONCLUSION: A dose-effect relationship between dose and swallowing complaints was observed. One way to improve the QoL is to constrain the dose to be received by the swallowing muscles.     

Local control in advanced cancer of the nasopharynx: Is a boost dose by endocavitary brachytherapy of prognostic significance?

PurposeTo analyze whether local tumor control in advanced nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) can be optimized by boosting the primary dose by endocavitary brachytherapy (EBT).Methods and MaterialsTo study the role of EBT, three data sets on NPC, that is, the “Vienna”, “Rotterdam,” and “Amsterdam” series, with a total number of 411 advanced NPC patients, were available. The Rotterdam series consisted of 72 patients (34 T1,2N+ and 38 T3,4N0,+) and were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by external beam radiotherapy (dose 70/2 Gy). After 70/2 Gy, a boost was applied by EBT (in case of T1,2N+) or stereotactic radiation (in case of T3,4 tumors). The Amsterdam (Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital/The Netherlands Cancer Institute) series consisted of 76 patients (40 T1,2N+ and 36 T3,4N0,+) and were irradiated to a dose of 70/2 Gy with concomitant chemotherapy. No second boost by EBT was applied.ResultsIn the case of T1,2N+ tumors, the local relapse rate (LRR) was significantly smaller if a boost was applied, that is, 0% (0/34, EBT boost) vs. 14% (14/102, no EBT boost) (p = 0.023). For the T3,4 tumors, an LRR of 10% (4/38, EBT or stereotactic radiation boost) vs. 15% (17/111, no boost) was found (p = 0.463).ConclusionsIn the case of advanced NPC (T1,2N+ vs. T3,4N+,0), for early T-stages (T1,2N+), an EBT boost seems an excellent way to deliver highly conformal high doses of radiation to the nasopharynx, with high local control rates. For advanced T-stages (T3,4N+,0), the reduction in LRR (10% vs. 15%) was not significant (p = 0.463).     

High-dose-rate intraoperative radiotherapy for close or positive margins in patients with locally advanced or recurrent rectal cancer

PURPOSE: A high-dose-rate intraoperative radiotherapy (HDR-IORT) technique for rectum cancer was developed and the technique, local failure, and survival were analyzed. METHODS AND MATERIALS: After the exclusion of metastatic patients, 37 patients were treated with external beam RT, surgery, and HDR-IORT between 1997 and 2000. Primary locally advanced rectum cancer was found in 18 patients and recurrent disease in 19. HDR-IORT was only administered if the resection margins were < or =2 mm. The flexible intraoperative template is a 5-mm-thick pad with 1-cm-spaced parallel catheters. Clips were placed during surgery to define the target area. A dose of 10 Gy was prescribed at a 1 cm depth from the template surface and calculated using standard plans. After treatment, the dose at the clips was calculated using the reconstructed template geometry and the actual treatment dwell times. The median follow-up of surviving patients was 3 years. No patients were lost to follow-up. RESULTS: Overall, 12 patients (32%) had local recurrence, 5 (14%) of which were in the HDR-IORT field. The 3-year local failure rate for primary tumors and recurrent tumors was 19% and 52%, respectively (p = 0.0042). The 3-year local failure rate was 37% for negative margins and 26% for positive margins (p = 0.51). A high mean dose at the clip (17.3 Gy) was found. The overall survival was significantly different for primary vs. recurrent tumors, stage, and grade. CONCLUSION: Because of the HDR technique, a high dose at the clips was found, with good local control. More out-of-field than in-field failures were seen. The local failure rate was significantly different for primary vs. recurrent disease.     

Determination of the accuracy of implant reconstruction and dose delivery in brachytherapy in The Netherlands and Belgium.

PURPOSE: To gain insight into the accuracy of brachytherapy treatments, the accuracy of implant reconstruction and dose delivery was investigated in 33 radiotherapy institutions in The Netherlands and Belgium. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The accuracy of the implant reconstruction method was determined using a cubic phantom containing 25 spheres at well-known positions. Reconstruction measurements were obtained on 41 brachytherapy localizers, 33 of which were simulators. The reconstructed distances between the spheres were compared with the true distances. The accuracy of the dose delivery was determined for high dose rate (HDR), pulsed dose rate (PDR) and low dose rate (LDR) afterloading systems using a polymethyl methacrylate cylindrical phantom containing a NE 2571 ionization chamber in its centre. The institutions were asked to deliver a prescribed dose at the centre of the phantom. The measured dose was compared with the prescribed dose. RESULTS: The average reconstruction accuracy was -0.07 mm (+/-0.4 mm, 1 SD) for 41 localizers. The average deviation of the measured dose from the prescribed dose was +0.9% (+/-1.3%, 1 SD) for 21 HDR afterloading systems, +1.0% (+/-2.3%, 1 SD) for 12 PDR afterloaders, and +1.8% (+/-2.5%, 1 SD) for 15 LDR afterloaders. CONCLUSIONS: This comparison showed a good accuracy of brachytherapy implant reconstruction and dose delivery in The Netherlands and Belgium.     

Subcutaneous spacer injection to reduce skin toxicity in breast brachytherapy: A pilot study on mastectomy specimens

Purpose

Accelerated partial breast irradiation is a treatment option for selected patients with early-stage breast cancer. Some accelerated partial breast irradiation techniques lead to skin toxicity with the skin dose as a main risk factor. Biodegradable spacers are effective and safe in prostate brachytherapy to protect the rectum. We hypothesize that a subcutaneous spacer injection reduces the skin dose in breast brachytherapy.

Determination of the reference air kerma rate for 192Ir brachytherapy sources and the related uncertainty

Different methods exist to determine the air kerma calibration factor of an ionization chamber for the spectrum of a 192Ir high-dose-rate (HDR) or pulsed-dose-rate (PDR) source. An analysis of two methods to obtain such a calibration factor was performed: (i) the method recommended by [Goetsch et al., Med. Phys. 18, 462-467 (1991)] and (ii) the method employed by the Dutch national standards institute NMi [Petersen et al., Report S-EI-94.01 (NMi, Delft, The Netherlands, 1994)]. This analysis showed a systematic difference on the order of 1% in the determination of the strength of 192Ir HDR and PDR sources depending on the method used for determining the air kerma calibration factor. The definitive significance of the difference between these methods can only be addressed after performing an accurate analysis of the associated uncertainties. For an NE 2561 (or equivalent) ionization chamber and an in-air jig, a typical uncertainty budget of 0.94% was found with the NMi method. The largest contribution in the type-B uncertainty is the uncertainty in the air kerma calibration factor for isotope i, N(i)k, as determined by the primary or secondary standards laboratories. This uncertainty is dominated by the uncertainties in the physical constants for the average mass-energy absorption coefficient ratio and the stopping power ratios. This means that it is not foreseeable that the standards laboratories can decrease the uncertainty in the air kerma calibration factors for ionization chambers in the short term. When the results of the determination of the 192Ir reference air kerma rates in, e.g., different institutes are compared, the uncertainties in the physical constants are the same. To compare the applied techniques, the ratio of the results can be judged by leaving out the uncertainties due to these physical constants. In that case an uncertainty budget of 0.40% (coverage factor=2) should be taken into account. Due to the differences in approach between the method used by NMi and the method recommended by Goetsch et al., an extra type-B uncertainty of 0.9% (k= 1) has to be taken into account when the method of Goetsch et al. is applied. Compared to the uncertainty of 1% (k= 2) found for the air calibration of 192Ir, the difference of 0.9% found is significant.