Intensive Care Unit-Acquired Weakness – diagnostischer Stellenwert des neuromuskulären Ultraschalls

Die Anaesthesiologie - Die Intensive Care Unit-Acquired Weakness (ICUAW) stellt eine der häufigsten neuromuskulären Komplikationen in der Intensivmedizin dar. Besonders bei...     

Current state of biologic pharmacovigilance in the European Union: improvements are needed

Introduction: Pharmacovigilance is essential to monitoring the safety profiles of authorized medicines. Compared with small-molecule drugs, biological drugs are more complex, more susceptible to structural variability due to manufacturing processes, and have the potential to induce immune-related reactions, underscoring the importance of safety monitoring for these products. Although highly similar to reference products, biosimilars are not expected to be structurally identical. For these reasons, proper reporting of potential adverse drug reactions (ADRs) using distinguishable names and batch numbers is essential for accurate tracing of all biological drugs. To address the need for robust pharmacovigilance, the European Parliament and Council of the European Union provided legislation regarding pharmacovigilance of biologics in 2010.

Areas covered: This narrative review examines the current state of pharmacovigilance for biologics in the European Union (EU) and discusses relevant information on pharmacovigilance of biosimilars, the current EU pharmacovigilance system, and areas that could be improved.

Expert opinion: Although steps have been taken to improve pharmacovigilance of biologics in the EU, several enhancements can still be made, including additional training for healthcare professionals on ADR reporting, the use of 2D barcodes that enhance traceability, and an open discussion of potentially missed opportunities in the pharmacovigilance of biosimilars.     

Collection of Wound Exudate From Human Digit Tip Amputations Does Not Impair Regenerative Healing: A Randomized Trial

The regrowth of amputated digit tips represents a unique regenerative healing in mammals with subcutaneous volume regrowth, restoration of dactylogram, and suppression of scar formation. Although factor analysis in amphibians and even in mice is easy to obtain, safety of harvesting biomaterial from human digit tip amputations for analysis has not yet been described.The aim of this study was to evaluate if recovering wound exudate does hamper clinical outcome or influence microbiologic or inflammation status.A predefined cohort of 18 patients with fresh digit tip amputations was randomly assigned to receive standard therapy (debridement, occlusive dressing) with (n = 9) or without (n = 9) collection of the whole wound exudate in every dressing change. Primary endpoint (lengthening) and secondary endpoints (regeneration of dactylogram, nail bed and bone healing, time to complete wound closure, scar formation, 2-point discrimination, microbiologic analysis, inflammatory factors interleukin (IL)-1α, tumor necrosis factor-α, IL-4, and IL-6) were determined by an independent, blinded observer.Patients’ characteristics showed no significant differences between the groups. All patients completed the study to the end of 3 months follow-up. Exudate collection did not influence primary and secondary endpoints. Furthermore, positive microbiologic findings as well as pus- and necrosis-like appearance neither impaired tissue restoration nor influenced inflammatory factor release.Here, the authors developed an easy and safe protocol for harvesting wound exudate from human digit tip amputations. For the first time, it was shown that harvesting does not impair regenerative healing. Using this method, further studies can be conducted to analyze regeneration associated factors in the human digit tip.DRKS.de Identifier: DRKS00006882 (UTN: U1111-1166-5723).     

Gibt es Unterschiede bei natürlichen Zähnen und Implantaten?

Der Freie Zahnarzt -     

Extreme Photosensitivität seit der Kindheit

Ohne Zusammenfassung     

Carcinoembryonic antigen expression of resurgent human colon carcinoma after treatment with therapeutic doses of 90Y-alpha-carcinoembryonic antigen monoclonal antibody

We have previously shown that the colon carcinoma (LS174T) xenografts that emerged shortly after radioimmunotherapy with 90Y-labeled anti-CEA monoclonal antibody (MAb) ZCE025 lacked significant expression of CEA in comparison with the untreated tumors. The present study was designed to establish if the immunophenotype of the treated tumors was the result of CEA specific therapy and if the effect was permanent. Athymic mice bearing LS174T tumors were treated either with 120 mu Ci of 90Y-ZCE025, an equal dose of 90Y-96.5 (nonspecific MAb), or received no treatment. When the treated tumors grew to approximately 1.5 cm in diameter (6 weeks after therapy), they were resected and aliquoted to be transplanted to other mice, plated in tissue culture, fixed in formalin, and homogenized for CEA quantitation. The procedure was repeated 3 times (a total of 4 months after treatment). The CEA content was evaluated 2 and 6 weeks after therapy and when the tumors were transplanted. We confirmed a 4-fold decrease of CEA in the resurgent tumors 6 weeks after specific 90Y-ZCE025 therapy, which was twice the decrease experienced by the tumors treated with nonspecific 90Y-96.5, indicating substantial and specific killing of CEA-expressing cells. The CEA content slowly but progressively increased with each new pass of the tumor in the mice, reaching approximately one-half the value of the controls at the end of the study. The resurgent tumors were also studied by immunohistochemistry with MAbs detecting different epitopes of CEA, keratin, TAG-72, and epithelial membrane antigen to evaluate possible additional immunophenotypic changes induced by radioimmunotherapy. Only the expression of TAG-72 (recognized by MAb B72.3) increased immediately after therapy, but it returned to the original levels by the end of the study. These results suggest that: (a) specific radioimmunotherapy with 90Y-ZCE025 selectively kills cells that express higher levels of CEA; (b) the immunophenotype of the surviving fraction of the tumor appears to slowly revert to its original form; and (c) other tumor markers unrelated to CEA can also be affected. These observations have important implications for the design of radioimmunotherapy trials.