A dose-ranging, placebo-controlled, pilot trial of Acotiamide in patients with functional dyspepsia

Abstract  Impaired gastric accommodation, hypersensitivity to distension and delayed gastric emptying are major pathophysiological mechanisms in functional dyspepsia (FD). Acotiamide (Z-338) was well-tolerated in healthy volunteers. To determine the effect of three doses of Acotiamide on major pathophysiological mechanisms, symptoms, quality of life (QOL) and safety in functional dyspeptics. A phase IIa, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (14, 21 and 28 days, respectively, for run-in, study drug administration and follow-up). Gastric accommodation, sensitivity to distension and gastric emptying were assessed by barostat and ¹³C breath test, symptoms by daily diary cards and QOL by SF-36. A total of 71 patients were enrolled (62 evaluable). There was no effect on gastric emptying and sensitivity to distension. 300 mg was better than placebo for meal accommodation ( P  = 0.024). 100 mg was better than placebo at week 2 for upper abdominal bloating ( P  = 0.001) and overall symptom score ( P  = 0.022), and at week 3 for bloating ( P  = 0.008) and heartburn ( P  = 0.041). 100 mg was also better than placebo for QOL (physical function) ( P  = 0.003). Acotiamide was safe and well-tolerated in patients with FD. The involved mechanism could at least in part depend on an effect on meal-induced accommodation. 100 mg Acotiamide exhibited the potential to improve FD symptoms and QOL. Further studies are indicated.     

The role of somatosensory cortical regions in the processing of painful gastric fundic distension: an update of brain imaging findings

Abstract  Painful gastric distension is processed in a network consisting of brainstem, thalamus, insula, anterior cingulate cortex, (lateral) orbitofrontal and prefrontal cortex, superior temporal cortex and cerebellum. However, the role of primary and secondary somatosensory cortical regions (SI/SII) in the processing of visceral sensation or pain in general and gastric sensation in particular remains unclear. The aim of this study was to localize activations in the SI/SII area from our previously published functional brain imaging studies on gastric distension more precisely, using newly available cytoarchitectonic probability maps of SI/SII, implemented in the SPM Anatomy toolbox. In healthy volunteers, we found two clusters to be overlapping with SII (mainly the OP4 subregion) and, to a lesser extent, SI, although this overlap was small in size. In functional dyspepsia patients, we found two clusters to be overlapping with SII (mainly OP4), of which the cluster in the right hemisphere also overlapped with SI. These findings were confirmed in a conjunction analysis of both groups. Activation in right SI/SII was significantly higher in healthy volunteers when formally compared to patients. These results provide more detailed information on the brain processing of gastric sensation, supporting the hypothesis that SI/SII are involved. This is in line with some previously published studies on visceral sensation, but at variance with some other studies. Methodological differences between the brain imaging studies on gastric distension may account for these somewhat discrepant findings.     

Cortical deactivations during gastric fundus distension in health: visceral pain‐specific response or attenuation of ‘default mode’ brain function? A H215O‐PET study

Abstract Gastric distension activates a cerebral network including brainstem, thalamus, insula, perigenual anterior cingulate, cerebellum, ventrolateral prefrontal cortex and potentially somatosensory regions. Cortical deactivations during gastric distension have hardly been reported. To describe brain areas of decreased activity during gastric fundus distension compared to baseline, using data from our previously published study (Gastroenterology, 128, 2005 and 564). H₂¹⁵O‐brain positron emission tomography was performed in 11 healthy volunteers during five conditions (random order): (C₁) no distension (baseline); isobaric distension to individual thresholds for (C₂) first, (C₃) marked, (C₄) unpleasant sensation and (C₅) sham distension. Subtraction analyses were performed (in SPM2) to determine deactivated areas during distension compared to baseline, with a threshold of P_{uncorrected_voxel_level} < 0.001 and P_{corrected_cluster_level} < 0.05. Baseline–maximal distension (C₁–C₄) yielded significant deactivations in: (i) bilateral occipital, lateral parietal and temporal cortex as well as medial parietal lobe (posterior cingulate and precuneus) and medial temporal lobe (hippocampus and amygdala), (ii) right dorsolateral and dorso‐ and ventromedial PFC, (iii) left subgenual ACC and bilateral caudate head. Intragastric pressure and epigastric sensation score correlated negatively with brain activity in similar regions. The right hippocampus/amygdala deactivation was specific to sham. Gastric fundus distension in health is associated with extensive cortical deactivations, besides the activations described before. Whether this represents task‐independent suspension of ‘default mode’ activity (as described in various cognitive tasks) or an visceral pain/interoception‐specific process remains to be elucidated.     

Influence of abuse history on gastric sensorimotor function in functional dyspepsia

Abstract  Patients with functional gastrointestinal disorders have elevated rates of sexual or physical abuse, which may be associated with altered rectal sensorimotor function in irritable bowel syndrome. The aim was to study the association between abuse history and gastric sensorimotor function in functional dyspepsia (FD). We studied gastric sensorimotor function with barostat (sensitivity, compliance and accommodation) and gastric emptying test in 233 consecutive FD patients from a tertiary care centre (162 women, mean age 41.6 ± 0.9). Patients filled out self-report questionnaires on history of sexual and physical abuse during childhood or adulthood. Eighty-four patients (out of 198, 42.4%) reported an overall history of abuse [sexual and physical in respectively 30.0% (60/200) and 20.3% (42/207)]. FD patients reporting general as well as severe childhood sexual abuse have significantly lower discomfort thresholds during gastric distension [respectively 10.5 ± 0.4 vs 7.5 ± 1.0 mmHg above minimal distending pressure (MDP), P  = 0.014 and 10.5 ± 0.4 vs 6.6 ± 1.2 mmHg above MDP, P  = 0.007]. The corresponding intra-balloon volume was also significantly lower (respectively 579 ± 21 vs 422 ± 59 mL, P  = 0.013 and 579 ± 19 vs 423 ± 79 mL, P  = 0.033). Gastric accommodation was significantly more pronounced in patients reporting rape during adulthood (91 ± 12 vs 130 ± 40 mL, P  = 0.016). Abuse history was not associated with differences in gastric emptying. A history of abuse is associated with alterations in gastric sensorimotor function in FD. Particularly sexual abuse, rather than physical abuse, may influence gastric sensitivity and motor function.