Does magnetic stimulation of sacral nerve roots modify colonic motility? Results of a randomized double‐blind sham‐controlled study

Abstract  Although sacral nerve root stimulation (SNS) can result in a symptomatic improvement of faecal incontinence, the mechanism of action remains unknown. The aim of this study was to assess whether short-term magnetic SNS can inhibit pharmacologically induced propulsive colonic contractions. Twelve healthy volunteers (median age: 43.5 years old) were studied on two separate occasions and randomized into either active (15 Hz, 100% output intensity for 5 s min⁻¹ for 30 min) or sham rapid rate lumbosacral magnetic stimulation (rLSMS). Colorectal motility was recorded with a manometric catheter located at the most proximal transducer in the left colon and the most distal, in the rectum. Colonic contractions were provoked by instilling Bisacodyl. The effects of rLSMS on colonic, sigmoid and rectal contractions were monitored and recorded after Bisacodyl instillation. The appearance of high-amplitude contractions propagated or not (HAC/HAPC) provoked by Bisacodyl instillation was significantly delayed during active compared to sham stimulation ( P  = 0.03). There was no difference in the characteristics of HAC/HAPC (i.e. frequency, amplitude, duration, velocity of propagation) or the motility index with active or sham stimulation. The perception of urgency tended to be decreased with rLSMS following Bisacodyl instillation. The catheter was expulsed within a median of 16.5 min (range 8–39) after Bisacodyl administration during active stimulation compared to 14 min (range 5–40) during sham stimulation ( P  = 0.03). This study suggests that rLSMS could delay the appearance of the first Bisacodyl-induced colonic contractions.     

Colonosphincteric electromyographic responses to sacral root stimulation: evidence for a somatosympathetic reflex

Abstract  The aim of the present study was to determine the effects of selectively stimulating the afferent fibres running in the dorsal sacral roots (S1, S2, S3) and the somatic (radial and sciatic) nerves on colonic and internal anal sphincter (IAS) electromyographic (EMG) activity in anaesthetized cats to try to understand how sacral nerve stimulation can improve fecal continence in human. Electrically stimulating the afferent fibres present in the sacral dorsal roots and somatic nerves inhibited the colonic spike potential frequency ( n  = 97) and increased the slow variations in the sphincteric membrane potential ( n  = 76). These effects were found to have disappeared after administering an α-noradrenergic receptor blocker ( n  = 64) or sectioning the sympathetic efferent fibres innervating these organs ( n  = 69) suggesting the involvement of the sympathetic system in the effects observed. Moreover, no significant differences were observed between the effects of sacral dorsal root vs somatic nerve stimulation on colonic and sphincteric EMG activity. In conclusion, the data obtained here show that neurostimulation applied to the sacral spinal roots may improve fecal continence by inhibiting colonic activity and enhancing IAS activity via a somatosympathetic reflex.