THE TREATMENT OF ACUTE AND CHRONIC VAGINAL CANDIDOSIS

Vaginal candidosis is one of the most common infections of the vagina and the first accredited record of the disease appeared in 1849. Over the years the terms ‘candidiasis’ and ‘candidosis’ have been used, but it is generally accepted now that the terms are synonymous, and the term most commonly in use today is ‘candidosis’. Mainly caused by the yeast Candida albicans, the condition is characterised by intense inflammation of the vaginal mucosa and a curdy, off-white discharge; it is often associated with severe vulval itching and possibly burning pain. The severity of symptoms seems to vary greatly from patient to patient and the reason for this is unclear. It is suggested that in some patients there may be an element of hypersensitivity. Vaginal candidosis may occur in children but is most common in adults and only sometimes affects the elderly. The majority of women will suffer at least one attack of vaginal candidosis during their lifetime, and there are several predisposing factors such as diabetes, pregnancy and antibiotics. Some authorities consider the condition more frequent in those taking oral contraceptives or other hormones.     

Identification of a Membrane Receptor for Retinol-Binding Protein Functioning in the Cellular Uptake of Retinal

Retinol-binding protein (RBP) is the transport protein that carries retinol in the circulation from the liver to its target tissues. The existence of a cell-surface receptor on the target cells, which mediates the uptake of retinol from RBP, has been known since 1975. Recently, it was identified as an integral transmem-brane protein named STRA6 that is inducible by retinoic acid in certain cancer cells. The receptor was found to be highly specific for RBP, with high affinity, and to be localized in all tissues known to require retinol for their function, particularly the pigment epithelium of the eye.     

Establishing the Cost-Effectiveness of New Pharmaceuticals under Conditions of Uncertainty—When Is There Sufficient Evidence?

Decisions about which health-care interventions represent adequate value to collectively funded health-care systems are as widespread as they are unavoidable. In the case of new pharmaceuticals, many countries now require formal cost-effectiveness analysis to inform this decision-making process. This requires evidence on parameters associated with health-related utilities, treatment effects, resource use, and costs, for which data from available regulatory trials are invariably absent or highly uncertain. This uncertainty results from a number of factors including the predominance of intermediate end points in the clinical evidence-base and the limited period of follow-up of patients in clinical studies. Despite these imperfections in the evidence base, decisions about whether new pharmaceuticals are sufficiently cost-effective for reimbursement cannot be side-stepped. Data limitations do, however, require the use of rigorous analytical methods to support decision making. Probabilistic decision models and value of information analysis offer a means of structuring decision problems, synthesizing all available data, characterizing the uncertainty in the decision, quantifying the cost of uncertainty, and establishing the expected value of perfect information. This analytical framework is important because it addresses two fundamental questions about new pharmaceuticals. First, is the product expected to be cost-effective on the basis of existing evidence? Second, is additional research concerning the product itself cost-effective? In addressing these questions, the analytical framework can establish when sufficient evidence exists to sustain a claim for a new pharmaceutical to be cost-effective.     

The information needs of women newly diagnosed with breast cancer

Nurses can play a key role in patient education, including providing patients with useful and approrate information Rather than focusing on the process of education or information giving by nurses, this study places emphasis on the content of that information by taking the patients'perspective and asking the patients themselves what particular types of information are perceived as important at a specific point in time The aim of the study was to explore what particular types of information were important to women newly diagnosed with breast cancer, to enable nurses and other health care professionals to utilize their time as effectively as possible and provide a high-quality service to individuals in their care Women with breast cancer (a mean of 2 5 weeks from diagnosis) were interviewed and asked to compare items of information The items of information were presented m pairs and the women stated a preference for one item in that pan- Thirty-six pairs were presented in total The analysis involved the use of a Thurstone scaling model, which allowed rank ordermgs, or profiles of information needs, to be developed, reflecting the perceived importance of each item Information about the likelihood of cure, the spread of the disease and treatment options were perceived as the most important items of information at the tune of diagnosis Other information needs, in order of descending priority, included information about the risk to family, side-effects     

Trial of a new method of natural family planning in Liberia

This paper describes the evaluation of a new method of natural family planning (NFP) in Liberia. The Modified Mucus Method (MMM) was developed to address the need for a simple method of charting for poor and illiterate women. The acceptance, use, and cost-effectiveness of the MMM were compared with standard NFP methods, the sympto-thermal and ovulation method (ST/OM), used in the same population.The personal discontinuation rate of MMM users was 27.3 per 100 women per year compared with 3.2 among ST/OM users. Unplanned pregnancy rates were low for both MMM and ST/OM, 6.6 and 1.5 respectively. The cost per couple year protection (CYP) for MMM was $55.80 and for ST/OM $56.10. There were differences in characteristics between MMM and ST/OM clients. The MMM clients were more likely to have attended school and to have used a family planning method previously, and were less likely to be housewives.We conclude that the MMM in Liberia was provided to an inappropriate sample of women, educated and middle-class rather than poor and illiterate. The MMM users were dissatisfied and discontinued at the rate of 44 per 100 women entering per year. This is an unfair evaluation of the MMM because of the unsuitable study population. It is our opinion that the MMM needs more study to become part of the inventory of birth spacing methods.

---

Resumen Este trabajo describe la evaluación de un nuevo método de planificación familiar natural (PFN) in Liberia. El Método del Moco Modificado (MMM) se desarrolló a fin de atender a la necesidad de un método sencillo de registro para mujeres pobres y analfabetas. La aceptación, el uso y la eficacia en función de los costos del MMM se comparó con los métodos estándares de PFN, el Método Sintotérmico y de Ovulación (ST/OM), utilizado en la misma población.La tasa de abandono personal de las usuarias del MMM fue 27,3 por cada 100 mujeres por año en comparación con 3,2 entre las usuarios del ST/OM. El costo por protección-año de la pareja en le caso del MMM fue $55,80 y el del ST/OM $56,10. Hubo características diferentes entre las usuarias del MMM y del ST/OM. Había más probabilidades de que las usuarias del MMM hubieran asistido a la escuela y utilizado métodos de planificación familiar anteriormente, y menos probabilidades de que fueran amas de casa. Llegamos a la conclusión de que el MMM en Liberia era proporcionado a una muestra inadecuada de mujeres, más bien educadas y de clase media que pobres y analfabetas. Las usuarias del MMM estaban insatisfechas y lo abandonaron a razón de 44 por cada 100 mujeres que lo adoptaban por año. Esta es una evaluación injusta del MMM debido a lo inadecuado de la población del estudio. Opinamos que el MMM requiere mayores estudios para poder llegar a integrar el inventario de métodos de espaciamiento de nacimientos.

---

Resumé Le présent exposé décrit l'évaluation d'une nouvelle méthode de planning familial naturel au Libéria. La méthode de modification des glaires (MMM) a été mise au point pour satisfaire au besoin de disposer d'une méthode simple pouvant être appliquées par les femmes pauvres et analphabètes. L'acceptation, l'utilisation et l'efficacité de cette méthode par rapport à son coût ont été comparées à celles d'autres méthodes de planning familial naturel, à la méthode sympto-thermique et de l'ovulation (ST/O), appliquées dans cette même population.Le taux d'abandon de la MMM pour des raisons personnelles s'est élevé à 27,3 par an, alors qu'il était de 3,2 chez les femmes utilisant la méthode ST/O. Le nombre des grossesses non planifiées était faible pour l'une et l'autre des méthodes, soit 6,6 pour la MMM et 1,5 pour la méthode ST/O. Le coût annuel de la protection par couple se situait à $55,80 pour la première méthode et à $56,10 pour la seconde. Les femmes présentaient des caractéristiques différentes d'un groupe à l'autre. Celles qui utilisaient la MMM étaient plus souvent susceptibles d'avoir été scolarisées et d'avoir auparavant utilisé une méthode de planning familial, et moins susceptibles d'être des ménagères.Nous en avons conclu que la MMM avait été mise à la disposition d'un groupe de femmes éduquées, de classe moyenne, à qui elle ne convenait pas, plutôt qu'à des femmes pauvres et analphabètes. Les utilisatrices n'en étant pas satisfaites, elles avaient abandonné la méthode à un pourcentage de 44 pour cent femmes l'essayant chaque année. Cette évaluation de la MMM n'est pas valable car cette méthode n'était pas adaptée à la population étudiée. Nous estimons qu'il est nécessaire d'étudier plus en profondeur la MMM si l'on veut qu'elle fasse partie de l'ensemble des méthodes visant à espacer les naissances.

     

Nosocomial colonisation and infection in a paediatric respiratory intensive care unit.

A study of the prevalence of nosocomial colonisation and nosocomial infection (NI) was conducted in the paediatric respiratory intensive care unit of a large teaching hospital serving a developing community. Surveillance specimens were collected regularly from 63 consecutive patients admitted over 4 months, and also from professional staff, boarder mothers, cleaners and the unit environment. The incidence among patients of colonisation (40%) and of NI (43%) was high. The risk of dying in children with NI was appreciably increased (relative risk 2,241, confidence interval 0,591-8,503). This did not reach statistical significance, probably because so few children escaped acquiring hospital organisms. The significant risk factor for acquiring colonisation (P = 0.008) and NI (P < 0.0001) was a ward stay of more than 10 days. In addition, for acquiring NI an age of under 6 months was also predictive (P = 0.0298). The nature of the primary illness dictated the time spent in the ward; an important proportion of patients had preventable diseases, such as measles, pneumonia and tetanus, which required prolonged treatment. All children with endotracheal intubation had hospital-acquired organisms in tracheal aspirates. Eighty-two per cent of children developed positive gastric aspirates, 17% a positive urine culture and 11% a positive blood culture. Colonisation occurred rapidly; organisms initially appeared in gastric aspirates (mean 2 days), then in tracheal aspirates (mean 5 days) and urine cultures (mean 10 days). The acquired organisms, many of which were antibiotic-resistant, were almost exclusively enteric Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) and Staphylococcus aureus.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)