Aim
To determine the effect of aminoglycoside cycling in six tertiary intensive care units (ICU) on the rates of sepsis, aminoglycoside resistance patterns, antibiotic consumption, and costs.
Methods
This was a prospective longitudinal interventional study that measured the effect of change from first-line gentamicin usage (February 2002-February 2003) to amikacin usage (February 2003-February 2004) on the aminoglycoside resistance patterns, number of patients with gram-negative bacteremia, consumption of antibiotics, and the cost of antimicrobial drugs in 6 tertiary care ICUs in Zagreb, Croatia.
Results
The change from first-line gentamicin to amikacin usage led to a decrease in the overall gentamicin resistance of gram-negative bacteria (GNB) from 42% to 26% (
P<0.001; z-test of proportions) and netilmicin resistance from 33% to 20% (
P<0.001), but amikacin resistance did not change significantly (
P = 0.462), except for
Acinetobacter baumanni (
P = 0.014). Sepsis rate in ICUs was reduced from 3.6% to 2.2% (
P<0.001; χ
2 test), with a decline in the number of nosocomial bloodstream infections from 55/100 patient-days to 26/100 patient-days (
P = 0.001, χ
2 test). Furthermore, amikacin use led to a 16% decrease in the overall antibiotic consumption and € 0.1/patient/d cost reduction.
Conclusion
Exclusive usage of amikacin significantly reduced the resistance of GNB isolates to gentamicin and netilmicin, the number of GNB nosocomial bacteremias, and the cost of total antibiotic usage in ICUs.Despite the introduction of newer, less toxic antimicrobial agents, aminoglycosides continue to have a role in the treatment of serious gram-negative bacillary infections. Gentamicin, because of its low cost, remains the aminoglycoside of choice in hospitals, with low levels of resistance among
Enterobacteriaceae and
Pseudomonas aeruginosa (
1). Most gram-negative bacteria (GNB) isolated from patients in intensive care units (ICU) have become more resistant to gentamicin (
2) and ICU patients are more likely to have antimicrobial-resistant organisms than other patients or outpatients (
3).Aminoglycoside resistance is mediated through three key mechanisms: a ribosomal mutation, reduced transport into the cell, and activity of plasmid-mediated aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes (
4,
5). These enzymes include three acetyltransferases, four adenyltransferases, and five phosphotransferases (
5). Aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes are substrate-specific. Gentamicin and tobramycin are susceptible to at least five enzymes and the result is considerable cross-resistance between these two agents. Netilmicin is susceptible to four modifying enzymes, while amikacin is susceptible to aminoglycoside 6’-N-acetyltransferase, and is therefore useful against gentamicin-resistant GNB (
6). No significant increase in the resistance to amikacin has been noticed during the past ten years, even with extensive and exclusive use (
7-
9). However, frequent use of amikacin usually results in a decreased resistance to other aminoglycosides (
10).Several discrete strategies have been suggested to prevent or reduce microbial resistance to antimicrobials, including optimal use of agents, control, removal or restriction of antimicrobials, use of antimicrobials in combination, and rotation or cyclic use of antimicrobials (
11). The latter strategy is attractive because it periodically removes certain classes or specific agents that could induce or select resistance from the institutional environment (
12). The cyclic exposure prevents the development of resistance by a growth disadvantage of microorganisms when the selective antibiotic pressure is withdrawn and by eliminating the resistant microorganisms by different antibiotics (
13). Studies showed that resistance to gentamicin was significantly reduced when amikacin was used (
14), but it reappeared in the first gentamicin recycle. The second introduction of amikacin led to a decreased resistance to gentamicin, but the second introduction of gentamicin did not lead to reappearance of resistance (
11). Trials that monitor the resistance are required to design optimal protocols and provide clinically meaningful results (
15). However, the effect of empirical amikacin therapy on ICU patients with GNB in blood cultures has not been so far shown. Decreasing the number of GNB infections has both clinical and economical significance.The aim of this study was to evaluate prospectively the effect of intensive amikacin usage on the aminoglycoside resistance patterns, number of gram-negative isolates and gram-negative bacteremias, consumption of antibiotics, and the cost of antimicrobial treatment in ICUs.
相似文献