How does measurement of platelet P-selectin compare with other methods of measuring platelet function as a means of determining the effectiveness of antiplatelet therapy?

Measurement of P-selectin on activated platelets as a means of measuring platelet function utilizing the technology described here has the advantage of not requiring immediate access to specialist equipment and expertise. Blood samples are activated, fixed, stored, and transported to a central laboratory for flow cytometric analysis. Here we have compared P-selectin with other more traditional approaches to measuring platelet function in blood and/or platelet-rich plasma (PRP) from patients with acute coronary syndromes on treatment for at least 1 month with either aspirin and clopidogrel or aspirin with prasugrel. The comparators were light transmission aggregometry (LTA), VerifyNow and Multiplate aggregometry (for determining the effects of aspirin) and LTA, VerifyNow and Multiplate together with the BioCytex VASP phosphorylation assay (for the P2Y₁₂ antagonists). The P-selectin Aspirin Test revealed substantial inhibition of platelet function in all but three of 96 patients receiving aspirin with clopidogrel and in none of 51 patients receiving aspirin and prasugrel. The results were very similar to those obtained using LTA. There was only one patient with high residual platelet aggregation and low P-selectin expression. The same patients identified as “non-responders” to aspirin also presented with the highest residual platelet activity as measured using the VerifyNow system, although not quite as well separated from the other values. With the Multiplate test only one of these patients clearly stood out from the others. The results obtained using the P-selectin P2Y₁₂ Test in 102 patients taking aspirin and clopidogrel were similar to the more traditional approaches in that a wide scatter of results was obtained. Generally, high values seen with the P-selectin P2Y₁₂ Test were also high with the LTA, VerifyNow, Multiplate, and BioCytex VASP P2Y₁₂ Tests. Similarly, low residual platelet function using the P2Y₁₂ test was seen irrespective of the testing procedure used. However, there were differences in some patients. Prasugrel was always more effective than clopidogrel in inhibiting platelet function with none of 56 patients (P-selectin and VerifyNow), only 2 of 56 patients (Multiplate) and only 3 of 56 patients (Biocytex VASP) demonstrating high on-treatment residual platelet reactivity (HRPR) defined using previously published cut-off values. The exception was LTA where there were 11 of 56 patients with HRPR. It remains to be seen which experimental approach provides the most useful information regarding outcomes after adjusting therapies in treated patients.     

Focal spasticity therapy with botulinum toxin: effects on function, activities of daily living and pain in 100 adult patients.

OBJECTIVE: Analysis of the effects of a comprehensive focal spasticity program in adult patients. DESIGN: Retrospective study of an out-patient cohort. PATIENTS: One hundred patients were enrolled in the study (54 men and 46 women, mean age 41 years (SD 14). Cerebral palsy and stroke were equally common (80% in total). The remaining patients had miscellaneous diagnoses, including traumatic brain injury. METHODS: On average 230 units (SD 101) of botulinum toxin A Botox was given for 227 principal therapy targets chosen by the patient or the caregiver. One patient could have several targets for therapy. Administration of botulinum toxin was combined with 260 additional therapeutic interventions, most of which were forms of physical therapy. The effects were assessed after 6 weeks and compared with baseline functional abilities 1-2 weeks prior to therapy. RESULTS: Improvement was observed for 211 (93%) therapy targets, no change in 15 (7%), and impairment in 1, corresponding to an overall improvement in 90 patients (90%), 9 unchanged (9%) and worsening in 1. Spasticity assessment (Ashworth scale 0-4; 30 patients) showed a statistically significant improvement (median at baseline was 3 vs 2 after therapy, mean difference 1.2, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Improvement was observed in >or=90% of patients and in their principal therapeutic targets in a cohort receiving their first focal spasticity treatment with botulinum toxin A and additional therapy. A strict strategy for patient selection and comprehensive management was followed.