Induced pluripotent stem cells for disease modeling,cell therapy and drug discovery in genetic autonomic disorders: a review

Clinical Autonomic Research - The autonomic nervous system (ANS) regulates all organs in the body independent of consciousness, and is thus essential for maintaining homeostasis of the entire...     

The prognostic value of somatosensory and motor evoked potentials in comatose patients.

Somatosensory and motor evoked potentials (SEP and MEP) were examined in a total of 213 patients in traumatic (n = 140) and nontraumatic (n = 73) coma. It was the aim of this study to compare the prognostic value of MEP elicited by both electrical and magnetoelectric transcranial stimulation with the use of SEP alone. According to the presence or absence of responses and the duration of central conduction time, SEP and MEP obtained during Days 1 through 3 after the onset of coma were divided into four categories and correlated with the outcome of the patients, as assessed by the Glasgow Outcome Scale. Our results clearly show that in terms of prognostic value, SEP are superior to MEP, with normal findings indicating a favorable outcome and absent responses an unfavorable outcome. On the other hand, patients with normal electromyographic responses after both electrical and magnetoelectric stimulation had favorable and unfavorable outcomes about equally. Thus, unlike SEP, normal MEP do not allow any prognostic conclusions. Only the bilateral absence of MEP in response to electrical stimulation was a definitely unfavorable prognostic sign because all of these patients died. In contrast, with magnetoelectric stimulation, neither normal nor absent responses allowed any prognostic conclusions. Therefore, the prognostic value of electrically evoked motor responses is limited, and magnetoelectric stimulation cannot be recommended in this context.     

Motor evoked responses recorded epidurally in a patient with Guillain-Barré syndrome

Summary The case of a 75-year-old man with Guillain-Barré syndrome is presented. By means of transcranial electrical stimulation and epidural recording at the spinal level L2-3, distinct potentials with a latency of 21ms were obtained when the patient was tetraplegic. At the same time electromyographic responses of the thenar and anterior tibial muscles were absent following both transcranial and peripheral nerve stimulation. The patient recovered partially within 4 weeks. It is concluded that epidurally recorded motor evoked responses allow electrophysiological assessment of the descending pathways even in severe cases of Guillain-Barré syndrome and might contribute to a more accurate prediction of outcome.     

Prognostic value of somatosensory- and motor-evoked potentials in patients with a non-traumatic coma

Summary A total of 28 patients with non-traumatic coma were studied both with somatosensory- and motor-evoked potentials. While somatosensory-evoked potentials (SEP) have proved to be useful in predicting the outcome in patients with severe brain damage, the aim of this study was to find out whether the additional evaluation of motor-evoked potentials (MEP) could contribute to a better prediction of the outcome than SEP alone. Our results clearly indicate that in terms of prognostic value, SEP are superior to MEP. Nine patients with bilaterally preserved MEP died, while all of the patients with bilaterally preserved SEP and a central conduction time 6.5 ms survived, with a Glasgow outcome score of 1 to 3. Therefore, we cannot recommend the inclusion of MEP in the prognostic evaluation of patients with non-traumatic coma.     

'Breaking' position-invariant object recognition

While it is often assumed that objects can be recognized irrespective of where they fall on the retina, little is known about the mechanisms underlying this ability. By exposing human subjects to an altered world where some objects systematically changed identity during the transient blindness that accompanies eye movements, we induced predictable object confusions across retinal positions, effectively 'breaking' position invariance. Thus, position invariance is not a rigid property of vision but is constantly adapting to the statistics of the environment.