Retrospective review of pemetrexed with or without platinum in malignant mesothelioma: The Australian 'Special Access Scheme' experience

Background: Pemetrexed and cisplatin have recently been shown to significantly improve survival compared with cisplatin alone. However, there are only limited data reflecting teaching hospital experience outside a clinical trial. Pemetrexed has only been available in Australia on a restricted basis since 2002. We reviewed our experience of patients treated on the Australian ‘Special Access Scheme’ at three major thoracic oncology units. Methods: Charts were reviewed for all patients enrolled on the scheme. Data was extracted on age, World Health Organization (WHO) performance status, histology, prior therapy, time from diagnosis to starting pemetrexed, chemotherapy (pemetrexed alone or with a platinum), cycle number, response rate, actuarial progression‐free and overall survival. Doses were cisplatin 75 mg/m² or carboplatin AUC = 5 and pemetrexed 500 mg/m² every 21 days. Results: 52 patients (32 male and 20 female) were reviewed. Median age was 58 years and 88% were WHO 0–1. Histology included 54% epithelial, 17% biphasic (epithelial and sarcomatoid) and 21% undefined. The median time from diagnosis to administration of pemetrexed was 145 days. Sixty‐five percent had minimal surgical intervention with video assisted thoracoscopy, pleurodesis and biopsy, while 19% had received prior palliative radiation. Seventy‐one percent were chemotherapy naïve, the remaining 29% having received previous platinum and/or gemcitabine regimens. Twenty‐three percent had pemetrexed alone, 35% in combination with carboplatin and 42% with cisplatin. The median number of cycles was 4 (range 1–13). The response rate was 33%. No toxicity was observed in 20% grade 3–4 toxicity in 10% (majority nausea/vomiting). The median progression‐free and overall survival times from starting pemetrexed were 184 days and 298 days, respectively. Conclusions: Pemetrexed‐based regimens are safe and effective in a community setting in malignant mesothelioma.     

Low plasma growth hormone binding protein in IDDM.

Poorly controlled insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) is associated with elevated basal plasma growth hormone (GH), disproportionally low insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) levels, and impaired somatic growth. These derangements in the GH-IGF axis imply a state of GH resistance. The mechanism of GH resistance is unknown; it may involve a defect at the level of the GH receptor, unresponsiveness due to a postreceptor defect in GH action, or both. To investigate a potential receptor involvement, we measured plasma high-affinity GH-binding protein (GHBP), which represents a truncated GH receptor and may reflect GH receptor levels in tissues, in patients with IDDM, patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes (NIDDM), and nondiabetic control subjects. Patients with IDDM had significantly lower plasma GHBP levels than either patients with NIDDM or nondiabetic control subjects (mean value 18.2 vs. 24.6 and 23.8% GH bound/ml plasma, respectively, P less than 0.001). This difference persisted when only lean patients (less than 115% ideal body wt) were included in the analysis. Basal plasma GH levels were significantly elevated in IDDM compared with either patients with NIDDM or nondiabetic control subjects (mean 6.9 vs. 2.1 and 2.0 micrograms/L, respectively, P less than 0.001), whereas IFG-I levels were not significantly different in IDDM and NIDDM. No correlations were found between levels of GHBP and HbA1, duration of diabetes, or plasma GH. GHBP and IGF-I levels were significantly correlated in NIDDM but not in IDDM. We conclude that IDDM is associated with low GHBP levels and that GH resistance found in this disorder may be mediated, at least in part, by a decrease in GH receptor levels.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)