Secretion,blood levels and cutaneous expression of TL1A in psoriasis patients

TL1A is a TNF‐like cytokine which has been shown to co‐stimulate TH1 and TH17 responses during chronic inflammation. The expression of this novel cytokine has been investigated in inflammatory disorders like rheumatoid arthritis and inflammatory bowel disease, but little is known about expression and induction in psoriasis. Indeed, the pathogenesis in psoriasis is still not fully understood and it is speculated that cytokines other than TNF‐α are important in subsets of patients. Also, for patients with severe disease that are treated with systemic anti‐TNF‐α blockade, novel candidates to be used as disease and response biomarkers are of high interest. Here, we demonstrate TL1A expression in biopsies from psoriatic lesions. Also, we investigated spontaneous and induced TL1A secretion from PBMCs and blood levels from a cohort of psoriasis patients. Here, increased spontaneous secretion from PBMCs was observed as compared to healthy controls and a small subset of patients had highly elevated TL1A in the blood. Interestingly, activation of PBMCs with various cytokines showed a decreased sensitivity for TL1A activation in psoriasis patients compared to healthy controls.TL1A levels in blood and biopsies could not be correlated with disease activity with this patient cohort. Thus, additional large‐scale studies are warranted to investigate TL1A as a biomarker.     

Femoxetine and amitriptyline in general practice: a randomized double-blind group comparison

Patients with a depressive illness with 4 major symptoms of depression and a score of at least 17 on the Hamilton Depression Scale (1-17) (HDS) were allocated to a randomized double-blind group comparative study in general practice. After retrospective analysis, all 81 patients except one were characterized as suffering from a 'Definite Major Depressive Disorder', as defined by Spitzer et al. (1978). After 6 weeks of treatment with a daily dosage of 600 mg femoxetine or 150 mg amitriptyline, no statistically significant differences between the 2 treatment groups were observed, either when using the HDS or the clinical global assessment scale. Confidence limits of 95% for differences between therapeutic effect showed a non-significant tendency in favour of amitriptyline. During treatment, there were statistically significant differences in the reduction of HDS score between the 2 treatments in week 2. These differences were the result of amitriptyline's significantly greater effect on the 3 sleep items at week 2, as indicated by the results of single item analysis. Drop out rates due to side effects were between 14-15% in both treatment groups. Of the patients treated with femoxetine, 38% experienced no side effects, compared to 14% of patients treated with amitriptyline. Nausea was the side effect most commonly reported by patients treated with femoxetine, whereas a significantly greater frequency of anticholinergic side effects was recorded during treatment with amitriptyline (P less than 0.05). Unlike amitriptyline, femoxetine did not increase body weight. Treatment with the active drug was continued after the trial period in 14 and 18 patients in the femoxetine and amitriptyline groups respectively.     

Cisplatinum Dose Dependent Response in Germ Cell Cancer Evaluated by Tumour Marker Modelling

This study presents an analysis on longitudinal tumour marker series in twenty-two patients with non-seminomatous germ cell cancers treated with cisplatinum (DDP) based combination chemotherapy. Series of alphafoetoprotein (AFP), human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) were analyzed applying a dynamic mathematical marker model. The model analysis provided quantitated values for growth rate and treatment response in the marker producing cells. The analysis showed that LDH had to be above 2 000 U/l to be a trustworthy tumour marker. HCG producing cells tended to grow faster than AFP producing cells, and were 3-5-fold more sensitive to the chemotherapy given than AFP producing cells. Treatment response versus DDP dose appeared to be bi-phasic, but with no significant change in treatment efficiency within the given range of DDP doses.     

Members of the heat-shock protein 70 family promote cancer cell growth by distinct mechanisms

Whereas the stress-inducible heat-shock protein 70 (Hsp70) has gained plenty of attention as a putative target for tumor therapy, little is known about the role of other Hsp70 proteins in cancer. Here we present the first thorough analysis of the expression and function of the cytosolic Hsp70 proteins in human cancer cells and identify Hsp70-2, a protein essential for spermatogenesis, as an important regulator of cancer cell growth. Targeted knock-down of the individual family members by RNA interference revealed that both Hsp70 and Hsp70-2 were required for cancer cell growth, whereas the survival of tumorigenic as well as nontumorigenic cells depended on Hsc70. Cancer cells depleted for Hsp70 and Hsp70-2 displayed strikingly different morphologies (detached and round vs. flat senescent-like), cell cycle distributions (G2/M vs. G1 arrest) and gene expression profiles. Only Hsp70-2 depletion induced the expression of macrophage inhibitory cytokine-1 that was identified as a target of P53 tumor-suppressor protein and a mediator of the G1 arrest and the senescent phenotype. Importantly, concomitant depletion of Hsp70 and Hsp70-2 had a synergistic antiproliferative effect on cancer cells. Thus, highly homologous Hsp70 proteins bring about nonoverlapping functions essential for cell growth and survival.