Basilar-type migraine responsive to lamotrigine: three case reports

Neurological Sciences - Basilar-type migraine (BM) has been recognised in the revised International Classification of Headache Disorders as a distinct clinical entity (subtype of migraine with...     

Restless legs syndrome is not associated with migraine with aura: a clinical study

Based on recent data about the association between restless legs syndrome (RLS) and migraine, we performed an observational study on the occurrence of RLS in patients affected by “pure” migraine with aura (pMA). We recruited 63 patients (33 females and 30 males) affected by MA without other types of primary headache among all patients referred in five Italian headache centers in a 1-year period. The prevalence of RLS in pMA patients (9.5%) is similar to that observed in Italian headache-free subjects (8.3%). No significant differences were found between pMA patients with and without RLS about clinical features of MA attacks and systemic and psychiatric diseases were investigated. Moreover, no association appeared between RLS and familial cases of MA. Differently from migraine without aura, our data do not confirm the existence of an association between RLS and MA, not even when a genetic factor is involved.

     

ATP1A2 gene mutations are not present in two sisters with basilar-type migraine associated with menses

Basilar-type migraine (BM) and hemiplegic migraine are clinically distinct subtypes of migraine with aura, however they do share clinical features and it is possible they may share genetic bases. In recent years, ATP1A2 and other gene mutations have been discovered in familial and sporadic hemiplegic migraine. More recently, an ATP1A2 mutation has been identified in an Italian family with BM. In this study we document the absence of ATP1A2 mutations in two Italian sisters with menstrual BM, suggesting that other genes are involved in the condition.     

Primary and secondary chronic cluster headache: two separate entities?

The International Headache Society (IHS) classification divides chronic cluster headache (CH) into two subtypes: chronic CH unremitting from onset (CCHU) and chronic CH evolved from episodic (CCHE). The purpose of our study was to point out any similarities and differences between the two chronic CH subtypes and to determine whether or not they can be considered as two separate clinical entities. We reviewed data about 31 CCHE patients and 38 CCHU patients referred to the Parma Headache Centre between 1975 and 1999. Clinically, CCHE patients exhibited statistically significant differences from CCHU patients, i.e. earlier CH onset and duration of attacks varying more frequently between 120 and 180 min. From the point of view of lifestyle, heavy alcohol and coffee drinkers prevailed among CCHU patients, while CCHE patients were more frequently heavy smokers. Based on clinical features, it seems reasonable to suppose that chronic CH may occur as two distinct entities.     

Possible predictive factors in the prognosis of migraine with aura

In order to identify possible predictive factors in the prognosis of migraine with aura (MA), we conducted a review at 10 to 20 years from referral on a sample of 77 MA patients (51 F, 26 M) consecutively seen for the first time at the University of Parma Headache Center. Based on the date of the last MA attack reported by these patients, we divided them into two study groups: a group of 22 patients "with remission of the disease," i.e. attack-free for at least 2 years at the end of the follow-up study; and a group of 55 patients "without remission of the disease," i.e. still having attacks in the last 2 years of the follow-up study. A comparative analysis of the MA clinical features observed in the two groups at the time of the patients' first visit to our Center enabled us to identify a number of favorable prognostic indicators, namely: a family history of parents with MA, the absence of other associated forms of primary headache, and the absence of both natural and artificial light stimulation as trigger factors.     

High prevalence of Dopaminergic Premonitory Symptoms in migraine patients with Restless Legs Syndrome: a pathogenetic link?

In order to assess the prevalence of Dopaminergic Premonitory Symptoms (DPS) in migraine patients with Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS), we chose migraine patients from a large Italian clinical headache population previously investigated for an association between primary headaches and RLS. We evaluated a total sample of 164 patients with migraine, in particular 114 with migraine without aura (MO), 10 with migraine with aura (MA) and 40 with MO and MA in various combinations between them or with episodic tension-type headache (ETTH), defined as a “mixed group”. About 20% of all migraine patients referred at least one of the following DPS: yawning, nausea, somnolence or food craving, confirming data already indicated in the literature. Among migraine patients with RLS (25.6%), DPS were referred from about half of the patients (47.6%) compared to those without RLS (47.6% vs. 13.1%; p<0.001). Based on migraine subtype, patients with MO referred DPS (26.3%) more frequently compared to the MA group and “mixed group” (12.0%, p<0.05), particularly in the presence of RLS (63.0% vs. 20.0%, p<0.01). No statistical differences were found between clinical and demographic data of the subgroups or related to medical conditions investigated (anxiety, depression, sleep disorders, body mass index). It is interesting that the chances of having RLS in migraine patients were more than 5 times higher in the presence of DPS. These results could support a hypothetical dopaminergic imbalance in RLS and migraine, as the dopamine is involved in the pathogenesis of both disorders and it is responsible for the migraine DPS reported above.     

Adult abdominal migraine: a new syndrome or sporadic feature of migraine headache? A case report

Abdominal migraine is one of the variants of migraine headache typically occurring in children and coded as 1.3.2 in the revised edition of IHS classification within the group 'Childhood periodic syndromes that are commonly precursors of migraine'. The affected children frequently develop typical migraine later in their life. We report a case of a 23 years old woman affected by attacks of recurrent abdominal pain accompanied by migraine. Abdominal pain attacks started in the adolescence and persisted without headache until the patient was 21. At this time, she experienced migraine pain accompanied by nausea, photophobia and phonophobia and associated to acute abdominal pain. Neuroimaging investigations and laboratory testing excluded any underlying organic disease. Complete remission of abdominal attacks was obtained during 4-month treatment period with pizotifen. Attacks fulfil IHS diagnostic criteria for 'abdominal migraine', although of late onset. This case report suggests that 'abdominal migraine' is a migraineous disorder to be hypothesized in adult patients after having disclosed any organic disease. As reported in the literature, 'adult abdominal migraine' is a sporadic migraine subtype in adult patients and it is not to be considered as a new migraineous syndrome.     

Prodromes and the early phase of the migraine attack: therapeutic relevance

A migraine attack is a multiphasic event. In some patients the initial phase of the attack is characterized by the presence of "prodromes" or "premonitory symptoms" which are not recognized by the patient as part of the attack. Premonitory symptoms are defined as "symptoms preceding and forewarning of a migraine attack by 2-48 hours, occurring before the aura in migraine with aura and before the onset of pain in migraine without aura". Migraine premonitory symptoms should be differentiated from aura and symptoms of premenstrual syndrome. This differentiation, which is crucial to correct diagnosis, is based on two principal aspects, namely, the timing of these premonitory symptoms prior to the headache pain and their clinical characteristics. The neurotransmitters dopamine and serotonin are possibly involved in the development of premonitory symptoms, as demonstrated by experimental models and by the efficacy of migraine aborting and preventive treatments. Accurate recording of premonitory symptoms may contribute to efforts to design the best therapeutic approach in migraine patients.     

Possible predictive factors in the evolution of episodic to chronic cluster headache

The purpose of our study was to identify general factors and distinctive clinical features differentiating patients with chronic cluster headache (CH) evolved from episodic CH and patients with episodic CH. Our study sample included 28 patients suffering from chronic CH evolved from episodic CH and 258 patients with episodic CH; all were referred to the Headache Center of Parma between December 1975 and June 1998. Patients with episodic CH were selected from all episodic CH referrals (n = 485) and selection was based on the duration of the disorder, which was to exceed the average period needed for an episodic form to turn into a chronic form (4.5 years for females and 7.0 years for males). At CH onset, the mean age for patients with chronic CH evolved from episodic CH was older than for those with episodic CH. Among patients with chronic CH, more were smokers or heavy drinkers, and had suffered a head injury. Clinically, episodic CH evolving into chronic CH was characterized by a high frequency of cluster periods, a larger proportion of patients with attacks not occurring strictly within cluster periods, and remission periods lasting less than 6 months. Possible predictive factors in the development of chronic CH appear to be CH onset from the third decade of life onward, the occurrence of more than one cluster period a year, and the short-lived duration of remission periods. The role played by head injury and cigarette smoking in the evolution of the disorder still cannot be established with certainty.     

Weekend headache: a retrospective study in migraine without aura and episodic tension-type headache

Our retrospective study was aimed at determining the existence of weekend headache and, if so, whether it has the same clinical features as migraine without aura and episodic tension-type headache, or whether it occurs as a separate form of headache which could find its own place in the International Headache Society classification.
For this study, we reviewed the clinical records of 120 patients with migraine without aura and 120 patients with episodic tension-type headache randomly selected among all those referred to the Headache Center of the University of Parma Institute of Neurology between 1985 and 1996.
A review of these records suggests that weekend headache exists for both types of headache considered. Clinically, it is interesting to note that the male-to-female ratio for the weekend form of tension-type headache was 1:1, as opposed to 1:3 for general episodic tension-type headache. As regards classification, no evidence so far seems to suggest that weekend headache should be considered as an independent entity. Apart from certain features that appear to be peculiar to this form of headache—such as increased pain intensity—it thoroughly fulfills the diagnostic criteria of the primary headaches from which it evolves. Finally, a few clinical features suggest that the weekend may simply be a triggering factor in migraine without aura attacks, while playing a major role in episodic tension-type headache. However, weekend headache is a clinical entity that clearly needs further study.