Ingestion of immune bloodmeals and infection of Aedes fowleri, Aedes mcintoshi, and Culex pipiens with Rift Valley fever virus

Rift Valley fever (RVF) virus infection, dissemination, and transmission rates were determined for Aedes fowleri, Aedes mcintoshi and Culex pipiens 7 or 10 days after sequentially feeding to repletion on RVF virus immune hamsters and RVF viremic hamsters, or after feeding on a mixture of RVF virus immune sheep serum and RVF viremic hamster blood through a pledget. No significant differences in infection or dissemination rates were detected among Ae. fowleri and Cx. pipiens feeding to repletion on immune hamsters before or after feeding to repletion on a viremic hamster. Similarly, no significant differences in infection, dissemination, or transmission rates were observed among Ae. fowleri and Cx. pipiens feeding to repletion on immune hamsters or nonimmune (control) hamsters 0 or 24 hr after inoculation with RVF virus. Infection rates were significantly higher for Ae. fowleri (56/66, 85%) and Cx. pipiens (123/148, 83%) fed only on viremic hamsters than for those interrupted to complete feeding on an immune hamster (Ae. fowleri [24/49, 59%], Cx. pipiens [66/131, 50%]) or a nonimmune hamster (Ae. fowleri [32/51, 63%], Cx. pipiens [69/127, 54%]). However, no significant differences were detected in infection, dissemination, or transmission rates among Ae. fowleri, Ae. mcintoshi or Cx. pipiens fed on a viremic hamster and interrupted to complete feeding on an immune vs. a nonimmune hamster. Results from interrupted feeding experiments were significantly different from pledget feeding experiments.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Two-tiered DNA-based diagnosis of transthyretin amyloidosis reveals two novel point mutations

We analyzed 11 consecutive unrelated cases of polyneuropathy due to transthyretin amyloidosis. Direct sequencing of the promoter region, exons, and splice junctions revealed that each patient was heterozygous for a mutation: six patients had valine 30 substituted by methionine (V30----M; Portuguese-Japanese type), one had threonine 60 substituted by alanine (T60----A; Appalachian type), and two had serine 77 substituted by tyrosine (S77----Y; Illinois type). In addition, two patients had previously undescribed mutation: phenylalanine 33 substituted by leucine (F33----L) and phenylalanine 64 substituted by leucine (F64----L). From present information, the probands of these novel mutations do not exhibit any pathology that clearly distinguishes them from individuals with the other mutations. The mutations extend the range of mutations associated with amyloidotic polyneuropathy. In our 11 patients, the different mutations did not seem to correlate with distinct clinical phenotypes. We developed PASA assays (PCR amplification of specific alleles) for each of the five mutations. PASA can be used by any diagnostic laboratory that can perform PCR to rapidly detect any of the known mutations. The minority of samples with an undescribed mutation can be sent to a specialty laboratory for delineation of the mutation by direct genomic sequencing. The presently described combination of methods may have widespread utility in the diagnosis of genetic disease.     

Successful treatment of an infected vascular graft with gentamicin beads

This short report describes the successful healing of an infected axillo-bifemoral graft by the insertion of Gentamicin beads, this technique cannot be recommended for all infected grafts the majority of which will have to be removed and replaced.     

Inter-study differences: How should they influence the interpretation and analysis of results?

In determining the role inter-study variation should play in an overview analysis, it is important to consider three factors: which question one is trying to answer; the degree of similarity or dissimilarity of design, and the degree to which heterogeneity of outcomes can be explained. Three questions one might be interested in are: whether treatment can be effective in some circumstances; whether treatment is effective on average, and whether treatment was effective on average in the trials at hand. Under the assumption of no qualitative interaction, the answers to these questions coincide. The O-E analysis most directly answers the third question. Other analyses are suggested when the first question is of interest, using the aspirin post-MI studies as an example.