Quantitative measurement of lead in paint by XRF analysis without manual substrate correction

X-ray fluorescence analysis has been used for measurement of lead in paint for more than a decade. The early systems provided a nondestructive alternative technology to laboratory-based technologies, but were somewhat time consuming and often led to inconclusive results. The procedure required manual substrate correction, multiple measurements, operator's discretion in validating a measurement due to interfering elements and laboratory analysis of inconclusive samples. A new instrument, the RMD LPA-1 system, has been developed based on X-ray fluorescence technology that addresses all of the drawbacks to the older systems. This new system uses a carefully designed and controlled geometry and modern microprocessor technology to automatically provide a rapid quantitative measurement of lead in paint with a 95% confidence level. The improved precision and accuracy achieved with this system are due to geometric enhancements and a mathematical approach which incorporates corrections for both random and systematic errors such as matrix effects and Compton scatter. This technology has been incorporated in a hand-held X-ray fluorescence lead paint analyzer system. A key design philosophy for this system was to maintain a very narrow, task-specific focus, the system was not designed to be an all purpose XRF analyzer, rather it is optimized to meet regulatory requirements of lead paint testing in the most efficient manner. The development of the LPA-1 system is an example of what can be accomplished by listening to the needs and desires of the users, rethinking the design of an existing technique and incorporating modern microprocessor technology.     

The bipartite tarsal navicular bone: Radiographic and computed tomography findings

Two cases of bipartite tarsal navicular bone are presented. The radiographic and computed tomography (CT) findings of this anatomical variant are described. Correct recognition of this entity is important, both because it may be the cause of symptoms perse, and because it may be misdiagnosed as a fracture. When plain films are not diagnostic, CT scanning is helpful in distinguishing between a fracture and this variant.     

Rupture of the posterior tibial tendon: CT and surgical findings

Computed tomography (CT) was performed in 42 patients with 49 clinically suspected tears of the posterior tibial tendon. Twenty-eight of the 49 suspected tears were subsequently surgically explored and repaired. Three patterns of tendon abnormalities were recognized on CT scans: type I-intact, hypertrophied, heterogeneous tendon; type II-attenuated tendon; and type III-absence of a portion of a tendon. Types I and II correlated with partial rupture seen during surgery, and type III correlated with complete rupture of the tendon. CT findings were accurate in 96% of the patients who underwent surgery. In four cases (14%), tendon rupture was seen on CT scans, but the extent of the injury was underestimated and the rupture was misclassified. Reactive periostitis of the distal tibia was seen in 71% of diseased tendons and may represent an important factor in the diagnosis of tendon rupture.