Application of the adverse outcome pathway framework to genotoxic modes of action

In May 2017, the Health and Environmental Sciences Institute's Genetic Toxicology Technical Committee hosted a workshop to discuss whether mode of action (MOA) investigation is enhanced through the application of the adverse outcome pathway (AOP) framework. As AOPs are a relatively new approach in genetic toxicology, this report describes how AOPs could be harnessed to advance MOA analysis of genotoxicity pathways using five example case studies. Each of these genetic toxicology AOPs proposed for further development includes the relevant molecular initiating events, key events, and adverse outcomes (AOs), identification and/or further development of the appropriate assays to link an agent to these events, and discussion regarding the biological plausibility of the proposed AOP. A key difference between these proposed genetic toxicology AOPs versus traditional AOPs is that the AO is a genetic toxicology endpoint of potential significance in risk characterization, in contrast to an adverse state of an organism or a population. The first two detailed case studies describe provisional AOPs for aurora kinase inhibition and tubulin binding, leading to the common AO of aneuploidy. The remaining three case studies highlight provisional AOPs that lead to chromosome breakage or mutation via indirect DNA interaction (inhibition of topoisomerase II, production of cellular reactive oxygen species, and inhibition of DNA synthesis). These case studies serve as starting points for genotoxicity AOPs that could ultimately be published and utilized by the broader toxicology community and illustrate the practical considerations and evidence required to formalize such AOPs so that they may be applied to genetic toxicity evaluation schemes. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 61:114–134, 2020. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Psoriasis confined strictly to vitiligo areas – a Koebner‐like phenomenon?

Vitiligo and psoriasis are both common skin disorders. However, psoriasis strictly confined to pre-existing vitiligo areas is rare and suggests a causal relationship. We report here on two patients with a strict anatomical colocalization of vitiligo and psoriasis. The histopathological examinations showed typical changes for both diseases together with a dense infiltrate of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. By immunohistochemistry, intracytoplasmatic granzyme B and tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) were detected within the T-cell population, suggesting the functional activity of these cells and the creation of a local T helper 1 (Th1)-cytokine milieu. Additionally, in one patient we could identify anti-melanocytic T cells by tetramer staining and enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT) analysis. These skin-infiltrating lymphocytes might trigger, by the local production of Th-1 cytokines such as TNF-alpha and interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma), the eruption of psoriatic plaques in patients with a genetic predisposition for psoriasis.     

Understanding the minimum clinically important difference: a review of concepts and methods.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: The effectiveness of spinal surgery as a treatment option is currently evaluated through the assessment of patient-reported outcomes (PROs). The minimum clinically important difference (MCID) represents the smallest improvement considered worthwhile by a patient. The concept of an MCID is offered as the new standard for determining effectiveness of a given treatment and describing patient satisfaction in reference to that treatment. PURPOSE: Our goal is to review the various definitions of MCID and the methods available to determine MCID. STUDY DESIGN: The primary means of determining the MCID for a specific treatment are divided into anchor-based and distribution-based methods. Each method is further subdivided and examined in detail. METHODS: The overall limitations of the MCID concept are first identified. The basic assumptions, statistical biases, and shortcomings of each method are examined in detail. RESULTS: Each method of determining the MCID has specific shortcomings. Three general limitations in the accurate determination of an MCID have been identified: the multiplicity of MCID determinations, the loss of the patient's perspective, and the relationship between pretreatment baseline and posttreatment change scores. CONCLUSIONS: An ideal means of determining the MCID for a given intervention is yet to be determined. It is possible to develop a useful method provided that the assumptions and methodology are initially declared. Our efforts toward the establishment of a MCID will rely on the establishment of specific external criteria based on the symptoms of the patient and treatment intervention being evaluated.     

Advanced surgical techniques to enhance implant success in the maxilla.

While less emphasis has traditionally been placed on aesthetics in order to focus on successful osseointegration, increased success rates provided by contemporary endosseous root-form dental implants have improved postoperative peri-implant hard and soft tissue structures. The criteria for the evaluation of implant success should, therefore, include lack of pain, mobility, radiolucency, bone loss, infection, or paresthesia, as well as acceptability and stable aesthetics. This article discusses surgical means to preserve or restore hard and soft tissues around dental implants to achieve ideal and predictable outcomes.     

Postoperative analgesia: pain by choice? The influence of patient attitudes and patient education

Postoperative pain control can be unsatisfactory for a variety of reasons, including patients' attitudes towards pain treatment itself. To assess patients' expectations and their influence on postoperative analgesia, as well as the prevalence of pain following common gynaecological surgery, a prospective study was performed in 166 patients with either adbominal hysterectomy, mastectomy, laparoscopy or uterine curettage. After a first postoperative period with routine on-demand analgesia, a nurse specialised in pain treatment discussed the purposes and risks of pain treatment with the patients and cared for these patients in the second, subsequent study period. Following this discussion, 30 of 40 patients refusing analgesics in the first study period agreed to be given pain medication. In the groups with hysterectomy or mastectomy, pain control improved in the second postoperative period, even though the doses of analgesics administered were generally lower. Education of patients regarding the aims and risks of pain therapy is an essential part of pain control and can lead to an improvement of postoperative analgesia.     

CD15 (LeuM1) immunoreactivity: Prognostic factor for sporadic and hereditary medullary thyroid cancer?

Patients treated for sporadic and hereditary medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) have varying rates of persistent disease, recurrence, and survival. The aim of this study was to correlate the immunoreactivity of the monoclonal antibody CD15 (LeuM1) to initial clinical findings and the outcome of treatment. The primary tumors of 75 patients with sporadic MTC, 7 with hereditary disease, and 3 members of MEN 2A families were studied. Of these subjects 74 (87%) showed no or little immunoreactivity (<15% positive cells; score 0) in most tumors. The remaining 13% had surgery for tumors with more than 15% cells with positive staining (score I). There was no correlation between LeuM1 immunoreactivity and sex, age, and type of MTC. There was, however, a significant correlation with the pTNM classification and UICC staging. The prognosis for patients with score 0 was significantly better than score 1 patients. CD15 immunoreactivity appears to be a predictive factor in sporadic and hereditary MTC. Lymph node dissection seems to be more successful in patients with score 0 tumors than in those with score 1 tumors. The question of reoperation in patients with recurrence of disease (especially with biochemical recurrence or persistence) should be discussed on the basis of CD15 immunoreactivity.

---

Resumen Los pacientes tratados para carcinoma medular, esporádico y hereditario, de la glándula tiroides (CMT) exhiben grandes variaciones en las tasas de enfermedad persistente, recidiva y sobrevida. El propósito del presente estudio fue establecer la correlación entre la inmunorreactividad del anticuerpo CD15 (LeuM1) y los hallazgos clínicos iniciales, así como con el resultado final del tratamiento.Se estudiaron los tumores primarios de 75 pacientes con CMT esporádico, de siete con enfermedad hereditaria y de 3 miembros de familias con síndrome NEM2A.Setenta y cuatro pacientes (87%) exhibieron ninguna o muy baja inmunorreactividad (menos de 15% de células positivas; puntaje 0) en la mayoría de los tumores. El 13% restante fue sometido a cirugía por tumores con más de 15% de las células con coloración positiva (puntaje 1). No se evidenció correlación entre la inmunorreactividad LeuM1 y el sexo, edad o tipo del CMT. Sin embargo, sí apareció una correlación significativa con la clasificiación pTNM y la estadificación de la UICC. El pronóstico de los pacientes con puntaje 0 resultó significativamento mejor que el de los pacientes con puntaje 1.La inmunorreactividad CD15 parece ser un factor de predicción de pronóstico en el CMT esporádico y familiar. La disección ganglionar parece ser más exitosa en pacientes con tumores de puntaje 0 que en los que portan tumores con puntaje 1.El interrogante en cuanto a reoperación en pacientes con recidiva de la enfermedad (especialmente cuando hay recidiva o persistencia bioquímica) debe ser considerada con base en la inmunorreactividad CD15.

---

Résumé Les taux de maladie persistante, de récidive et de survie chez des patients traités pour cancer médullaire sporadique et héréditaire de la thyroïde (CMT) sont très variables. Le but de cette étude a été de corréler l'immunoréactivité des anticorps monoclonaux CD15 (LeuM1) à des données cliniques initiales et l'évolution finale du traitement des CMT. On a étudié 75 patients ayant un CMT primitif, sept ayant une maladie héréditaire, et trois membres d'une famille MEN 2A. Soixante quatre patients (87%) avaient peu ou pas d'immunoréactivité (moins de 15% de cellules positive: score = 0). Les 13% restants ont eu une chirurgie pour les tumeurs ayant un pourcentage > 15 (score = 1). Il n'y avait aucune corrélation entre l'immunoréactivité LeuM1 et le sexe, l'âge et le type de CMT. Il y avait, en revanche, une corrélation significative entre la classification pTMN et le stage UICC. Le pronostic des patients ayant un score = 0 était significativement meilleur que celui des patients ayant un score = 1. L'immunoréactivité CD15 apparaît comme étant un facteur pronostique des CMT. Le curage lymphatique

---

---

Members and institutions are listed in Table 1.